• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

去甲肾上腺素联合多巴胺输注对感染性休克患者呼气末二氧化碳(ETco2)压力的影响

Norepinephrine with dopamine infusion on the end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETco2) pressure in patients with septic shock.

作者信息

Sazgar Mohammad, Golikhatir Iraj, Pashaee Seyedeh Masoomeh, Tirandaz Fatemeh, Firouzian Abolfazl, Miniahidashti Hamed

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.

Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Intensive Care Unit, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.

出版信息

Caspian J Intern Med. 2021 Fall;12(4):580-585. doi: 10.22088/cjim.12.4.580.

DOI:10.22088/cjim.12.4.580
PMID:34820066
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8590414/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Septic shock is a critical medical condition and immediate intervention is required as well as hemodynamic stability using fluid and vasopressor. Direct relationship between changes in ETco2 and changes in the cardiac output. We evaluated the study by comparing the effect of using norepinephrine or dopamine on ETco2 of patients with septic shock.

METHODS

A clinical trial study was performed on 138 patients with primary diagnosis of septic shock. 70 patients received norepinephrine and 68 patients received dopamine. Patients' end tidal carbon dioxide (ETco2), mean arterial pressure (MAP), pulse rate (PR), arterial blood gas (ABG) levels in two groups were measured and compared at baseline and after 30 and 120 minutes after inotrope infusion. Variables were compared by means of an unpaired student t-test, an unadjusted chi-square test.

RESULTS

138 patients, 70 treated with norepinephrine infusion and 68 with dopamine infusion were included in the study. ETco2 level significantly increased within 120 minutes of treatment in the norepinephrine group (31.10±9.65) compared to the dopamine group (23.71±9.66) (P=0.001). MAP significantly decreased in the group of norepinephrine 30 minutes after treatment (71.71±20.460) (P=0.014) and pulse rate also significantly decreased in the norepinephrine group compared to the dopamine group in 30 minutes (98.07±10.63 vs 106.43±13.54) and 120 minutes (91.15±6.18 vs 103.51±2057) after treatment (P=0.001).

CONCLUSION

Tissue perfusion and fluid responsiveness of the shock in the norepinephrine group showed improvement. Using ETco2 as a measure for determining volume assessment in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation by septic shock is applicable.

摘要

背景

感染性休克是一种危急的医疗状况,需要立即进行干预,并使用液体和血管升压药维持血流动力学稳定。呼气末二氧化碳(ETco2)变化与心输出量变化之间存在直接关系。我们通过比较去甲肾上腺素或多巴胺对感染性休克患者ETco2的影响来评估该研究。

方法

对138例初步诊断为感染性休克的患者进行了一项临床试验研究。70例患者接受去甲肾上腺素治疗,68例患者接受多巴胺治疗。在基线以及输注血管活性药物后30分钟和120分钟时,测量并比较两组患者的呼气末二氧化碳(ETco2)、平均动脉压(MAP)、脉搏率(PR)、动脉血气(ABG)水平。变量通过不成对学生t检验、未校正卡方检验进行比较。

结果

138例患者纳入研究,其中70例接受去甲肾上腺素输注治疗,68例接受多巴胺输注治疗。与多巴胺组(23.71±9.66)相比,去甲肾上腺素组在治疗120分钟内ETco2水平显著升高(31.10±9.65)(P = 0.001)。去甲肾上腺素组在治疗30分钟后平均动脉压显著降低(71.71±20.460)(P = 0.014),且在治疗30分钟(98.07±10.63对106.43±13.54)和120分钟(91.15±6.18对103.51±20.57)后,去甲肾上腺素组的脉搏率也比多巴胺组显著降低(P = 0.001)。

结论

去甲肾上腺素组休克患者的组织灌注和液体反应性有所改善。将ETco2用作评估感染性休克机械通气患者容量评估的指标是可行的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4be6/8590414/e24951c61487/cjim-12-580-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4be6/8590414/e24951c61487/cjim-12-580-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4be6/8590414/e24951c61487/cjim-12-580-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Norepinephrine with dopamine infusion on the end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETco2) pressure in patients with septic shock.去甲肾上腺素联合多巴胺输注对感染性休克患者呼气末二氧化碳(ETco2)压力的影响
Caspian J Intern Med. 2021 Fall;12(4):580-585. doi: 10.22088/cjim.12.4.580.
2
[Comparison of effect of norepinephrine and terlipressin on patients with ARDS combined with septic shock: a prospective single-blind randomized controlled trial].去甲肾上腺素与特利加压素对急性呼吸窘迫综合征合并感染性休克患者疗效的比较:一项前瞻性单盲随机对照试验
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2017 Feb;29(2):111-116. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2017.02.004.
3
Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012.拯救脓毒症运动:严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理国际指南:2012 年。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb;41(2):580-637. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827e83af.
4
[Effect of esmolol on fluid responsiveness and hemodynamic parameters in patients with septic shock].艾司洛尔对感染性休克患者液体反应性及血流动力学参数的影响
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2015 Nov;27(11):885-9.
5
Assessing the Utility of End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide as a Marker for Fluid Responsiveness in Cardiogenic Shock.评估呼气末二氧化碳作为心源性休克液体反应性标志物的效用。
Cureus. 2021 Feb 5;13(2):e13164. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13164.
6
Beneficial effects of short-term vasopressin infusion during severe septic shock.严重脓毒症休克期间短期输注血管加压素的有益作用。
Anesthesiology. 2002 Mar;96(3):576-82. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200203000-00011.
7
Fixed-dose vasopressin compared with titrated dopamine and norepinephrine as initial vasopressor therapy for septic shock.与滴定剂量的多巴胺和去甲肾上腺素相比,固定剂量血管加压素作为脓毒性休克初始血管升压药治疗的疗效比较
Pharmacotherapy. 2004 Aug;24(8):1002-12. doi: 10.1592/phco.24.11.1002.36139.
8
Comparison of norepinephrine and dobutamine to epinephrine for hemodynamics, lactate metabolism, and gastric tonometric variables in septic shock: a prospective, randomized study.去甲肾上腺素和多巴酚丁胺与肾上腺素用于感染性休克血流动力学、乳酸代谢及胃张力测定变量的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Intensive Care Med. 1997 Mar;23(3):282-7. doi: 10.1007/s001340050329.
9
[Value of pulse indicator continuous cardiac output monitoring of cardiac function in septic shock patients: a prospective study].[脉搏指示连续心输出量监测在脓毒症休克患者心功能评估中的价值:一项前瞻性研究]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2015 Jan;27(1):22-7. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2015.01.006.
10
Changes in end-tidal CO2 could predict fluid responsiveness in the passive leg raising test but not in the mini-fluid challenge test: A prospective and observational study.呼气末二氧化碳的变化可预测被动抬腿试验中的液体反应性,但不能预测迷你液体冲击试验中的液体反应性:一项前瞻性观察研究。
J Crit Care. 2015 Oct;30(5):1061-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.05.019. Epub 2015 Jun 1.

引用本文的文献

1
The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2024.《2024年日本脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理临床实践指南》
J Intensive Care. 2025 Mar 14;13(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s40560-025-00776-0.
2
The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2024.《2024年日本脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理临床实践指南》
Acute Med Surg. 2025 Feb 24;12(1):e70037. doi: 10.1002/ams2.70037. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
Early management of adult sepsis and septic shock: Korean clinical practice guidelines.

本文引用的文献

1
Sepsis alerts in EMS and the results of pre-hospital ETCO2.急诊医疗服务中的脓毒症警报和院前 ETCO2 的结果。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Aug;37(8):1505-1509. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.11.009. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
2
Applications of End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide (ETCO2) Monitoring in Emergency Department; a Narrative Review.呼气末二氧化碳(ETCO₂)监测在急诊科的应用;一项叙述性综述
Emerg (Tehran). 2018;6(1):e5. Epub 2018 Jan 15.
3
Dopamine versus norepinephrine in the treatment of cardiogenic shock: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis.多巴胺与去甲肾上腺素治疗心源性休克:一项遵循PRISMA标准的荟萃分析。
成人脓毒症和脓毒性休克的早期管理:韩国临床实践指南
Acute Crit Care. 2024 Nov;39(4):445-472. doi: 10.4266/acc.2024.00920. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
4
Sepsis Management, Controversies, and Advancement in Nanotechnology: A Systematic Review.脓毒症管理、争议与纳米技术进展:一项系统综述
Cureus. 2022 Feb 11;14(2):e22112. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22112. eCollection 2022 Feb.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Oct;96(43):e8402. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008402.
4
Septic shock and the use of norepinephrine in an intermediate care unit: Mortality and adverse events.脓毒性休克及去甲肾上腺素在中级护理病房的应用:死亡率及不良事件
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 24;12(8):e0183073. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183073. eCollection 2017.
5
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016.拯救脓毒症运动:脓毒症与脓毒性休克管理国际指南:2016版
Crit Care Med. 2017 Mar;45(3):486-552. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002255.
6
End-tidal carbon dioxide variation after a 100- and a 500-ml fluid challenge to assess fluid responsiveness.100毫升和500毫升液体负荷试验后呼气末二氧化碳的变化以评估液体反应性。
Ann Intensive Care. 2016 Dec;6(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s13613-016-0141-9. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
7
Developing a New Definition and Assessing New Clinical Criteria for Septic Shock: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).制定脓毒性休克的新定义并评估新的临床标准:用于第三次脓毒症和脓毒性休克国际共识定义(Sepsis-3)。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):775-87. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0289.
8
Changes in end-tidal CO2 could predict fluid responsiveness in the passive leg raising test but not in the mini-fluid challenge test: A prospective and observational study.呼气末二氧化碳的变化可预测被动抬腿试验中的液体反应性,但不能预测迷你液体冲击试验中的液体反应性:一项前瞻性观察研究。
J Crit Care. 2015 Oct;30(5):1061-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.05.019. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
9
End-tidal carbon dioxide as a goal of early sepsis therapy.呼气末二氧化碳作为早期脓毒症治疗的目标。
Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Nov;32(11):1351-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.08.036. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
10
Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012.拯救脓毒症运动:严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理国际指南:2012 年。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb;41(2):580-637. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827e83af.