Suit-B Yong, Hassan Latiffah, Krauss Steven Eric, Ooi Peck Toung, Ramanoon Siti Zubaidah, Yasmin Abd Rahaman, Epstein Jonathan H
Department of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnostics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia.
Institute for Social Science Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia.
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Nov 8;8:695702. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.695702. eCollection 2021.
The 1998 Nipah virus outbreak in Malaysia resulted in major financial losses to the multi-million-dollar swine industry. While productivity and biosecurity of pig farms have improved since, biosecurity in some farms remains substandard with farmers struggling to adapt to current national pig farming policies. Farm viability and animal health depends on farmers' role as decision-makers in managing disease threats and other aspects of farm management. This study aimed to describe the mental model of farmers in making decisions about disease prevention and control measures during the 1998 Nipah virus outbreak, and in 2019, 20 years after the last reported Nipah case. Using a qualitative approach, in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 12 pig farmers (mostly small-scale or medium-scale farms) were conducted in three states in Malaysia. Data were analyzed via inductive content analysis. Thirty-six unique dimensions in the mental model were identified, representing six interrelated themes corresponding to participants' decision making related to disease prevention and control: drivers of action to prevent and control disease; perception of practice options; individual determinants of familiar practices; external social factors; external economic factors; and additional external factors. Key drivers of disease control and prevention responses during the Nipah outbreak included heightened perception of risk, emotions, perceived economic loss, and subjective norms whereas key drivers in 2019 included perception of risk, perceived effectiveness, perceived benefits, and other dimensions such as perception of the future, perceived economic cost, barriers, and loss. An unfavorable future outlook, perceived economic factors, and socio-political and personal factors currently hinders farm improvement and adoption of Pig Farming Areas (PFAs) and Modern Pig Farming (MPF) systems. Private sector service providers and veterinarians are highly influential in advocating for good biosecurity, herd health, and animal health intervention practices. Insights gained can inform the development of strategic policies and interventions.
1998年马来西亚爆发的尼帕病毒疫情给价值数百万美元的养猪业造成了重大经济损失。自那以后,养猪场的生产力和生物安全措施有所改善,但一些农场的生物安全水平仍未达标,农民们难以适应当前的国家养猪政策。农场的生存能力和动物健康状况取决于农民在管理疾病威胁及农场管理其他方面所扮演的决策者角色。本研究旨在描述农民在1998年尼帕病毒疫情期间以及在最后一例尼帕病例报告20年后的2019年,在制定疾病预防和控制措施决策时的思维模式。采用定性研究方法,对马来西亚三个州的12名养猪户(大多为小规模或中等规模农场)进行了深入的半结构化访谈。通过归纳式内容分析法对数据进行了分析。确定了思维模式中的36个独特维度,代表了与参与者疾病预防和控制决策相关的六个相互关联的主题:疾病预防和控制行动的驱动因素;对实践选项的认知;熟悉实践的个体决定因素;外部社会因素;外部经济因素;以及其他外部因素。尼帕疫情期间疾病控制和预防应对的关键驱动因素包括对风险的高度认知、情绪、感知到的经济损失和主观规范,而2019年的关键驱动因素包括对风险的认知、感知到的有效性、感知到的益处以及其他维度,如对未来的认知、感知到的经济成本、障碍和损失。当前,不利的未来前景、感知到的经济因素以及社会政治和个人因素阻碍了农场的改进以及养猪区(PFA)和现代养猪(MPF)系统的采用。私营部门服务提供商和兽医在倡导良好的生物安全、畜群健康和动物健康干预措施方面具有很大影响力。所获得的见解可为战略政策和干预措施的制定提供参考。