King's College London, Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, UK.
King's College London, Social, Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, UK.
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2022 May;29(3):857-873. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2696. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
Therapeutic engagement is a key component of psychological interventions. Robot-assisted psychological interventions appear to have therapeutic benefits for service users that are challenging to engage. However, engagement with robots in robot-assisted psychological interventions is not well understood. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the quality of therapeutic engagement in robot-assisted psychological interventions (PROSPERO: 122437).
Scopus, Web of Science, PsycInfo and Medline were searched until 15 January 2021 for studies which quantitatively evaluated therapeutic engagement in robot-assisted psychological interventions. The Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) quality assessment tool was used to assess methodological dimensions of studies.
3647 studies were identified through database searching. Thirty studies (N = 1462), published between 2004 and 2020, and from 14 countries, were included. Robots were typically toy animals or humanoids and were used to provide support and improve wellbeing through social interaction. Studies primarily tested robots on older adults with dementia and children with autism and indicated positive therapeutic engagement. Twelve studies included a control group. EPHPP ratings were 'strong' (N = 1), 'moderate' (N = 10) and 'weak' (N = 19).
Therapeutic engagement between service users and robots is generally positive. Methodological limitations of studies, such as small sample sizes, and lack of control groups and longitudinal data, mean that the field is in early stages of its development and conclusions should be drawn with caution. There are important practical and ethical implications for policymakers to consider, such as responsible clinical practice and how service users may understand the therapeutic relationship with robots.
治疗性参与是心理干预的一个关键组成部分。机器人辅助心理干预似乎对那些难以参与的服务使用者有治疗益处。然而,在机器人辅助心理干预中与机器人的互动还没有得到很好的理解。本系统评价的目的是评估机器人辅助心理干预中治疗性参与的质量(PROSPERO:122437)。
截至 2021 年 1 月 15 日,通过 Scopus、Web of Science、PsycInfo 和 Medline 数据库搜索评估机器人辅助心理干预中治疗性参与的研究。使用有效的公共卫生实践项目(EPHPP)质量评估工具评估研究的方法学维度。
通过数据库搜索共确定了 3647 项研究。最终纳入了 30 项研究(N=1462),这些研究发表于 2004 年至 2020 年期间,来自 14 个国家。机器人通常是玩具动物或人形机器人,用于通过社交互动提供支持和改善幸福感。这些研究主要针对老年痴呆症患者和自闭症儿童进行了机器人测试,并表明治疗性参与是积极的。有 12 项研究包括对照组。EPHPP 评价结果为“强”(N=1)、“中”(N=10)和“弱”(N=19)。
服务使用者与机器人之间的治疗性互动总体上是积极的。研究的方法学局限性,如样本量小、缺乏对照组和纵向数据,意味着该领域仍处于早期发展阶段,应谨慎得出结论。政策制定者需要考虑到一些重要的实际和伦理问题,例如负责任的临床实践以及服务使用者如何理解与机器人的治疗关系。