Institut Pasteur, Université de Paris, Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases Unit, CNRS UMR 2000, Paris, France.
Collège Doctoral, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Nat Commun. 2021 Nov 25;12(1):6895. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27163-1.
The shielding of older individuals has been proposed to limit COVID-19 hospitalizations while relaxing general social distancing in the absence of vaccines. Evaluating such approaches requires a deep understanding of transmission dynamics across ages. Here, we use detailed age-specific case and hospitalization data to model the rebound in the French epidemic in summer 2020, characterize age-specific transmission dynamics and critically evaluate different age-targeted intervention measures in the absence of vaccines. We find that while the rebound started in young adults, it reached individuals aged ≥80 y.o. after 4 weeks, despite substantial contact reductions, indicating substantial transmission flows across ages. We derive the contribution of each age group to transmission. While shielding older individuals reduces mortality, it is insufficient to allow major relaxations of social distancing. When the epidemic remains manageable (R close to 1), targeting those most contributing to transmission is better than shielding at-risk individuals. Pandemic control requires an effort from all age groups.
提出对老年人进行隔离以限制 COVID-19 住院人数,同时在没有疫苗的情况下放宽一般社交距离限制。评估此类方法需要深入了解各年龄段的传播动态。在这里,我们使用详细的年龄特异性病例和住院数据来模拟 2020 年法国夏季的疫情反弹,描述年龄特异性传播动态,并在没有疫苗的情况下对不同的针对年龄的干预措施进行严格评估。我们发现,尽管反弹始于年轻人,但尽管接触量大幅减少,4 周后≥80 岁的人群也受到影响,这表明各年龄段之间存在大量的传播流。我们得出了每个年龄组对传播的贡献。虽然隔离老年人可以降低死亡率,但这不足以允许对社交距离进行重大放松。当疫情仍在可控范围内(R 接近 1)时,针对那些对传播贡献最大的人群比隔离高危人群更好。大流行控制需要所有年龄段的共同努力。