• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Decade of Lessons Learned from Integration Strategies in the Netherlands.荷兰一体化战略十年经验教训
Int J Integr Care. 2021 Nov 8;21(4):15. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5703. eCollection 2021 Oct-Dec.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Transforming maternity care: obstetric partnerships as a policy instrument for integration.转型中的孕产护理:产科伙伴关系作为整合的政策工具。
Health Policy. 2020 Nov;124(11):1245-1253. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.05.019. Epub 2020 May 25.
4
The Netherlands: health system review.荷兰:卫生系统综述。
Health Syst Transit. 2010;12(1):v-xxvii, 1-228.
5
Inter-agency services in England and The Netherlands. A comparative study of integrated care development and delivery.英格兰和荷兰的跨部门服务。综合护理发展与提供的比较研究。
Health Policy. 1999 Aug;48(2):87-105. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(99)00037-8.
6
Intersectoral Policy Priorities for Health卫生领域的跨部门政策优先事项
7
Tuberculosis结核病
8
[Good governance in the Burundi health sector financial reform].[布隆迪卫生部门金融改革中的善治]
Sante Publique. 2014 Mar-Apr;26(2):229-40.
9
The impact of legislative versus non-legislative quality policy in health care: a comparison between two countries.立法性与非立法性医疗质量政策的影响:两个国家之间的比较。
Health Policy. 2001 Nov;58(2):99-119. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(01)00144-0.
10
Integrated Care for Older Adults: A Struggle for Sustained Implementation in Northern Netherlands.老年人综合护理:荷兰北部持续实施面临的挑战
Int J Integr Care. 2020 Jul 13;20(3):1. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5434.

引用本文的文献

1
Charting the Course Together: Municipal Top-Level Managers' Perspectives on Fostering Safe and Integrated Care for Older Adults Living at Home.共同规划路线:市政高层管理人员对促进居家老年人安全与综合护理的看法
Int J Integr Care. 2025 Aug 19;25(3):20. doi: 10.5334/ijic.8916. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
2
Integrated maternity care: A concept analysis.综合孕产妇保健:概念分析
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 1;19(8):e0306979. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306979. eCollection 2024.
3
A roadmap for sustainable implementation of vocational rehabilitation for people with mental disorders and its outcomes: a qualitative evaluation.精神障碍患者职业康复可持续实施路线图及其成果:一项定性评估
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2024 Feb 10;18(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13033-023-00620-8.
4
From Integrated Care to Integrating Care: A Conceptual Framework of Behavioural Processes Underlying Effective Collaboration in Care.从整合照护到整合式照护:有效协作照护背后行为过程的概念框架
Int J Integr Care. 2023 Oct 18;23(4):4. doi: 10.5334/ijic.7446. eCollection 2023 Oct-Dec.
5
The Time is Now, but Mind the Gaps: Communities - Governance - Implementation.时机已至,但需留意差距:社区 - 治理 - 实施。
Int J Integr Care. 2023 Jul 5;23(2):32. doi: 10.5334/ijic.7687. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.
6
Nursing Care Coordination in Primary Healthcare for Patients with Complex Needs: A Comparative Case Study.针对有复杂需求患者的初级医疗保健中的护理协调:一项比较案例研究。
Int J Integr Care. 2023 Feb 2;23(1):5. doi: 10.5334/ijic.6729. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Suitable Scales; Rethinking Scale for Innovative Integrated Care Governance.适用的规模;重新思考创新型综合医疗治理的规模
Int J Integr Care. 2020 Jan 8;20(1):1. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5468.
2
Enablers and Barriers in Implementing Integrated Care.实施综合护理的促进因素和障碍
Health Syst Reform. 2015 May 19;1(4):250-256. doi: 10.1080/23288604.2015.1077301.
3
The 2015 long-term care reform in the Netherlands: Getting the financial incentives right?荷兰 2015 年长期护理改革:财政激励措施得当吗?
Health Policy. 2019 Mar;123(3):312-316. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.10.010. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
4
Understanding Integrated Care.理解综合医疗服务
Int J Integr Care. 2016 Oct 28;16(4):6. doi: 10.5334/ijic.2530.
5
Netherlands: Health System Review.荷兰:卫生系统综述。
Health Syst Transit. 2016 Mar;18(2):1-240.
6
The policy and politics of the 2015 long-term care reform in the Netherlands.荷兰2015年长期护理改革的政策与政治情况
Health Policy. 2016 Mar;120(3):241-5. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.01.014. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
7
Integrating care through bundled payments--lessons from The Netherlands.通过捆绑支付整合医疗服务——来自荷兰的经验教训。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 17;364(11):990-1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1011849.
8
The politics of health-care reform in the Netherlands since 2006.2006 年以来荷兰的医疗改革政治。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2011 Jan;6(1):125-34. doi: 10.1017/S174413311000037X.
9
Effects of purchaser competition in the Dutch health system: is the glass half full or half empty?荷兰卫生系统中购买者竞争的影响:是半满还是半空?
Health Econ Policy Law. 2011 Jan;6(1):109-23. doi: 10.1017/S1744133110000381.
10
Perinatal mortality and morbidity in a nationwide cohort of 529,688 low-risk planned home and hospital births.在一个包含529,688例低风险计划在家分娩和医院分娩的全国性队列中的围产期死亡率和发病率。
BJOG. 2009 Aug;116(9):1177-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02175.x.

荷兰一体化战略十年经验教训

A Decade of Lessons Learned from Integration Strategies in the Netherlands.

作者信息

Nies Henk, Stekelenburg Diny, Minkman Mirella, Huijsman Robbert

机构信息

Director of Strategy & Development, Vilans, Centre of Expertise for Long-term Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Professor of Organization, Policy Development in Long-term Care, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Integr Care. 2021 Nov 8;21(4):15. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5703. eCollection 2021 Oct-Dec.

DOI:10.5334/ijic.5703
PMID:34824564
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8588908/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In the Netherlands multiple single, cross sector and cross governance level policy reforms were introduced to improve health and social care and decrease fragmentation. In addition to legislative and funding measures, the governmental strategy was to set up long-lasting improvement programs and supported by applied research.

DESCRIPTION

Five national improvement programs on chronic disease management, maternity care, youth care, care for older people and dementia care were analysed. The Laws of integration of Leutz were used as an analytical framework. The programs demonstrated a mixture of employing policy, quality and financial measures to stimulate coherence and integration.

DISCUSSION

The Laws that Leutz formulated are to a large extent applicable in the Dutch context. However, the characteristics of the system of governance being corporatist in its structure and its culture imply that it is hard to distinguish single actors being in the lead. Integration is a more complex process and requires more dynamics, than the law 'keep it simple, stupid' suggests.

CONCLUSIONS

In the Dutch context integration implies a permanent pursuit of aligning mechanisms for integration. Sustainable integration requires long-standing efforts of all relevant stakeholders and cannot be achieved quickly. It may take a decade of consistently applying a mix of policy instruments.

摘要

引言

在荷兰,多项单一、跨部门和跨治理层面的政策改革被引入,以改善卫生和社会护理并减少碎片化。除了立法和资金措施外,政府战略是设立长期改进计划并辅以应用研究。

描述

分析了五项关于慢性病管理、孕产妇护理、青少年护理、老年人护理和痴呆症护理的国家改进计划。吕茨整合法被用作分析框架。这些计划展示了采用政策、质量和财务措施来促进连贯性和整合的混合方式。

讨论

吕茨制定的法律在很大程度上适用于荷兰的情况。然而,治理体系在结构和文化上具有社团主义特征,这意味着很难区分处于主导地位的单一行为体。整合是一个比“保持简单,傻瓜”法则所暗示的更为复杂的过程,需要更多的活力。

结论

在荷兰的情况下,整合意味着对整合机制的持续追求。可持续的整合需要所有相关利益攸关方长期努力,无法迅速实现。可能需要十年持续应用一系列政策工具。