• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

难治性癫痫持续状态下系列间歇性脑电图的定量爆发抑制

Quantitative burst suppression on serial intermittent EEG in refractory status epilepticus.

作者信息

Peedicail Joseph, Mehdiratta Neil, Zhu Shenghua, Nedjadrasul Paulina, Ng Marcus C

机构信息

Section of Neurology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2021 Nov 1;6:275-280. doi: 10.1016/j.cnp.2021.10.003. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1016/j.cnp.2021.10.003
PMID:34825115
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8604990/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In refractory status epilepticus (RSE), the optimal degree of suppression (EEG burst suppression or merely suppressing seizures) remains unknown. Many centers lacking continuous EEG must default to serial intermittent recordings where uncertainty from lack of data may prompt more aggressive suppression. In this study, we sought to determine whether the quantitative burst suppression ratio (QBSR) from serial intermittent EEG recording is associated with RSE patient outcome.

METHODS

We screened the EEG database to identify non-anoxic adult RSE patients for EEG and chart review. QBSR was calculated per 10-second EEG epoch as the percentage of time during which EEG amplitude was <3 µV. Patients who survived 1-3 months after discharge from ICU and hospital comprised the favorable group. Further to initial unadjusted univariate analysis of all pooled QBSR, we conducted multivariate analyses to account for individual patient confounders ("per-capita analysis"), uneven number of EEG recordings ("per-session analysis"), and uneven number of epochs ("per-epoch analysis"). We analyzed gender, anesthetic number, and adjusted status epilepticus severity score (aSTESS) as confounders.

RESULTS

In 135,765 QBSR values over 160 EEG recordings (median 2.17 h every ≥24 h) from 17 patients on Propofol, Midazolam, and/or Ketamine, QBSR was deeper in the favorable group ( < 0.001) on initial unadjusted analysis. However, on adjusted multivariate analysis, there was consistently no association between QBSR and outcome. Higher aSTESS consistently associated with unfavorable outcome on per-capita (p = 0.033), per-session (p = 0.048) and per-epoch (p < 0.001) analyses. Greater maximal number of non-barbiturate anesthetic associated with favorable outcome on per-epoch analysis (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no association between depth of EEG suppression using non-barbiturate anesthetic and RSE patient outcome based on QBSR from serial intermittent EEG. A per-epoch association between non-barbiturate anesthetic and favorable outcome suggests an effect from non-suppressive time-varying EEG content.

SIGNIFICANCE

Targeting and following deeper burst suppression through non-barbiturate anesthetics on serial intermittent EEG monitoring of RSE is of limited utility.

摘要

目的

在难治性癫痫持续状态(RSE)中,最佳抑制程度(脑电图爆发抑制或仅仅是抑制癫痫发作)仍不明确。许多缺乏连续脑电图监测的中心不得不采用系列间歇性记录,而数据缺失带来的不确定性可能促使采取更积极的抑制措施。在本研究中,我们试图确定系列间歇性脑电图记录中的定量爆发抑制率(QBSR)是否与RSE患者的预后相关。

方法

我们筛查脑电图数据库,以识别非缺氧性成年RSE患者,进行脑电图和病历审查。每10秒脑电图时段计算QBSR,即脑电图振幅<3µV的时间百分比。从重症监护病房(ICU)和医院出院后存活1 - 3个月的患者组成预后良好组。除了对所有汇总的QBSR进行初始未调整单因素分析外,我们还进行多因素分析,以考虑个体患者混杂因素(“人均分析”)、脑电图记录数量不均(“每次记录分析”)以及时段数量不均(“每个时段分析”)。我们分析性别、麻醉次数和调整后的癫痫持续状态严重程度评分(aSTESS)作为混杂因素。

结果

在17例使用丙泊酚、咪达唑仑和/或氯胺酮的患者的160次脑电图记录(每≥24小时中位数为2.17小时)中得到的135,765个QBSR值,初始未调整分析显示预后良好组的QBSR更深(<0.001)。然而,在调整后的多因素分析中,QBSR与预后始终无关联。在人均分析(p = 0.033)、每次记录分析(p = 0.048)和每个时段分析(p < 0.001)中,较高的aSTESS始终与不良预后相关。在每个时段分析中,非巴比妥类麻醉剂的最大数量较多与良好预后相关(p < 0.001)。

结论

基于系列间歇性脑电图的QBSR,使用非巴比妥类麻醉剂进行脑电图抑制的深度与RSE患者的预后之间无关联。非巴比妥类麻醉剂与良好预后之间的每个时段关联表明非抑制性随时间变化的脑电图内容产生了影响。

意义

在RSE的系列间歇性脑电图监测中,通过非巴比妥类麻醉剂靶向并追求更深程度的爆发抑制效用有限。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7752/8604990/a00ae5c680a6/fx3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7752/8604990/e71b46d51daf/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7752/8604990/93c694bd7582/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7752/8604990/664bcadddba7/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7752/8604990/ff669d701484/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7752/8604990/da9c60bddde3/fx2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7752/8604990/a00ae5c680a6/fx3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7752/8604990/e71b46d51daf/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7752/8604990/93c694bd7582/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7752/8604990/664bcadddba7/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7752/8604990/ff669d701484/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7752/8604990/da9c60bddde3/fx2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7752/8604990/a00ae5c680a6/fx3.jpg

相似文献

1
Quantitative burst suppression on serial intermittent EEG in refractory status epilepticus.难治性癫痫持续状态下系列间歇性脑电图的定量爆发抑制
Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2021 Nov 1;6:275-280. doi: 10.1016/j.cnp.2021.10.003. eCollection 2021.
2
EEG Characteristics of Successful Burst Suppression for Refractory Status Epilepticus.难治性癫痫持续状态成功爆发抑制的脑电图特征
Neurocrit Care. 2016 Dec;25(3):407-414. doi: 10.1007/s12028-016-0294-2.
3
Treatment of Refractory Status Epilepticus With Continuous Intravenous Anesthetic Drugs: A Systematic Review.难治性癫痫持续状态的连续静脉内麻醉药物治疗:系统评价。
JAMA Neurol. 2024 May 1;81(5):534-548. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.0108.
4
Management of Refractory Status Epilepticus: An International Cohort Study (MORSE CODe) Analysis of Patients Managed in the ICU.难治性癫痫持续状态的管理:重症监护病房中患者的国际队列研究(MORSE CODe)分析。
Neurology. 2022 Sep 13;99(11):e1191-e1201. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000200818. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
5
Depth of EEG suppression and outcome in barbiturate anesthetic treatment for refractory status epilepticus.
Epilepsia. 1999 Jun;40(6):759-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1999.tb00775.x.
6
Induction of burst suppression or coma using intravenous anesthetics in refractory status epilepticus.在难治性癫痫持续状态中使用静脉麻醉剂诱导爆发抑制或昏迷。
J Clin Neurosci. 2015 May;22(5):854-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.11.007. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
7
Treatment of refractory status epilepticus with pentobarbital, propofol, or midazolam: a systematic review.使用戊巴比妥、丙泊酚或咪达唑仑治疗难治性癫痫持续状态:一项系统评价
Epilepsia. 2002 Feb;43(2):146-53. doi: 10.1046/j.1528-1157.2002.28501.x.
8
Impact of timing of continuous intravenous anesthetic drug treatment on outcome in refractory status epilepticus.持续静脉麻醉药物治疗时机对难治性癫痫持续状态结局的影响。
Crit Care. 2018 Nov 21;22(1):317. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2235-2.
9
Refractory status epilepticus: effect of treatment aggressiveness on prognosis.难治性癫痫持续状态:治疗积极性对预后的影响。
Arch Neurol. 2005 Nov;62(11):1698-702. doi: 10.1001/archneur.62.11.1698.
10
Association Between Induced Burst Suppression and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Refractory Status Epilepticus: A 9-Year Cohort Study.诱导爆发抑制与难治性癫痫持续状态患者临床结局的关系:一项 9 年队列研究。
Neurology. 2023 May 9;100(19):e1955-e1966. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207129. Epub 2023 Mar 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Using artificial intelligence to optimize anti-seizure treatment and EEG-guided decisions in severe brain injury.利用人工智能优化重型脑损伤的抗癫痫治疗及脑电图引导决策。
Neurotherapeutics. 2025 Jan;22(1):e00524. doi: 10.1016/j.neurot.2025.e00524. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
2
The Origin of the Burst-Suppression Paradigm in Treatment of Status Epilepticus.癫痫持续状态治疗中爆发-抑制范式的起源。
Neurocrit Care. 2024 Jun;40(3):849-854. doi: 10.1007/s12028-023-01877-0. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
3
Association Between Induced Burst Suppression and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Refractory Status Epilepticus: A 9-Year Cohort Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Under-sampling in epilepsy: Limitations of conventional EEG.癫痫中的欠采样:传统脑电图的局限性
Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2020 Dec 30;6:41-49. doi: 10.1016/j.cnp.2020.12.002. eCollection 2021.
2
Electroencephalographic Seizures in Emergency Department Patients After Treatment for Convulsive Status Epilepticus.急诊科接受癫痫持续状态治疗后的患者的脑电图发作。
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2022 Sep 1;39(6):441-445. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000800. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
3
Electrographic predictors of successful weaning from anaesthetics in refractory status epilepticus.
诱导爆发抑制与难治性癫痫持续状态患者临床结局的关系:一项 9 年队列研究。
Neurology. 2023 May 9;100(19):e1955-e1966. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207129. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
4
Recent applications of quantitative electroencephalography in adult intensive care units: a comprehensive review.定量脑电图在成人重症监护病房中的最新应用:全面综述。
J Neurol. 2022 Dec;269(12):6290-6309. doi: 10.1007/s00415-022-11337-y. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
电描记图预测难治性癫痫持续状态中麻醉剂成功撤药的指标。
Brain. 2020 Apr 1;143(4):1143-1157. doi: 10.1093/brain/awaa069.
4
Burst Suppression: Causes and Effects on Mortality in Critical Illness.爆发抑制:危重病患者死亡率的原因和影响。
Neurocrit Care. 2020 Oct;33(2):565-574. doi: 10.1007/s12028-020-00932-4.
5
Assessment of the Validity of the 2HELPS2B Score for Inpatient Seizure Risk Prediction.评估 2HELPS2B 评分对内住院癫痫发作风险预测的有效性。
JAMA Neurol. 2020 Apr 1;77(4):500-507. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.4656.
6
The diagnostic value of continuous EEG for the detection of non-convulsive status epilepticus in neurosurgical patients - A prospective cohort study.持续脑电图对神经外科患者非惊厥性癫痫持续状态检测的诊断价值——一项前瞻性队列研究。
Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2019 Apr 12;4:81-84. doi: 10.1016/j.cnp.2019.04.001. eCollection 2019.
7
Variability in pharmacologically-induced coma for treatment of refractory status epilepticus.药物诱导昏迷治疗难治性癫痫持续状态的变异性。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 31;13(10):e0205789. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205789. eCollection 2018.
8
Does burst-suppression achieve seizure control in refractory status epilepticus?爆发抑制能否控制难治性癫痫持续状态?
BMC Neurol. 2018 Apr 21;18(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12883-018-1050-3.
9
Refractory status epilepticus: Impact of baseline comorbidity and usefulness of STESS and EMSE scoring systems in predicting mortality and functional outcome.难治性癫痫持续状态:基线合并症的影响以及 STESS 和 EMSE 评分系统在预测死亡率和功能结局方面的作用。
Seizure. 2018 Mar;56:98-103. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2018.02.007. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
10
Status epilepticus-related etiology, incidence and mortality: A meta-analysis.癫痫持续状态相关的病因、发病率和死亡率:一项荟萃分析。
Epilepsy Res. 2017 Oct;136:12-17. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Jul 15.