Suppr超能文献

欧洲经济评价指南中的成本测算方法:共性与差异。

Costing methodologies in European economic evaluation guidelines: commonalities and divergences.

机构信息

Andalusian School of Public Health/Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública (EASP), Granada, Spain.

Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs, Granada, Spain.

出版信息

Eur J Health Econ. 2022 Aug;23(6):979-991. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01414-w. Epub 2021 Nov 26.

Abstract

From both the methodological point of view and standardization of methodology, little attention has been paid to the estimation of direct costs in evaluation of healthcare technologies. The objective is to revise the recommendations on direct costs provided in European economic evaluation guidelines and to identify the commonalities and divergences among them. To achieve this, a comprehensive search through several online databases was performed resulting in 41 documents from 26 European countries, be they economic evaluation guidelines or costing guidelines. The results show a large disparity in methodologies used in estimation of direct costs to be included in economic evaluations of health technologies recommended by European countries. A lack of standardization of cost estimation methodologies influences arbitrariness in selecting costs of resources included in economic evaluations of medicinal products or any other technologies and, therefore, in decision making process necessary to introduce new technology. In addition, this heterogeneity poses a major challenge for identifying factors that could affect the variability of unit costs across countries.

摘要

从方法论的角度和方法标准化的角度来看,在医疗技术评估中,直接成本的估计几乎没有得到关注。目的是修订欧洲经济评估指南中关于直接成本的建议,并确定它们之间的共同点和差异。为此,通过几个在线数据库进行了全面搜索,结果来自 26 个欧洲国家的 41 份文件,其中包括经济评估指南或成本指南。结果表明,欧洲国家推荐的卫生技术经济评估中包含的直接成本估计方法存在很大差异。成本估算方法缺乏标准化会影响到在药物或任何其他技术的经济评估中选择包括的资源成本的任意性,因此也会影响到引入新技术所需的决策过程。此外,这种异质性给确定可能影响国家间单位成本可变性的因素带来了重大挑战。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验