Suppr超能文献

[新冠疫情期间人工耳蜗植入后的远程治疗]

[Teletherapy after cochlear implantation during the COVID-19 pandemic].

作者信息

Völter Christiane, Stöckmann Carolin, Klein Hannah, Dazert Stefan, Thomas Jan Peter

机构信息

Klinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, St. Elisabeth-Hospital, Bleichstraße 15, 44787, Bochum, Deutschland.

Klinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Kath. St. Paulus Gesellschaft, St. Johannes Hospital Dortmund, Johannesstr. 9-17, 44137, Dortmund, Deutschland.

出版信息

HNO. 2022 Mar;70(3):214-223. doi: 10.1007/s00106-021-01124-y. Epub 2021 Nov 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, digitalization in healthcare grew rapidly. Auditory training after cochlear implantation usually takes place face-to-face but social distancing interferes with this therapeutic approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In follow-up treatment, 42 adult cochlear implant (CI) users aged 53.8 (±15.6) years received video therapy 1 x/week for 5 weeks on a certified platform. After each therapy session, the technical process and therapeutic content were assessed. At the end of the study, usability and the relationship between therapist and patient were evaluated by patients and therapists using the System Usability Scale (SUS), a final questionnaire and by the Skala Therapeutische Allianz - Revised (STA-R). Furthermore, a cost-benefit analysis was done.

RESULTS

Usability for both users was high (87.97 versus 93.0). Despite the lack of personal contact, therapeutic alliance was highly appreciated by patients and therapists (87.8% versus 84.8%). The main advantages for the patients were reductions in time and costs. In contrast, the rehabilitation center faced higher costs initially due to the longer time therapists needed to prepare the lessons. Technical problems had to be solved in > 75% of the first sessions but did not bother training thereafter. In total, 47.6% of the patients believe that teletherapy can completely fulfill their therapeutic needs.

CONCLUSION

Video therapy has been judged as a useful tool by all users and the majority wants to continue. However, it remains questionable whether the therapist-patient relationship can be sufficiently maintained over a longer period and whether online therapy is as effective as face-to-face therapy.

摘要

背景

由于新冠疫情,医疗保健领域的数字化发展迅速。人工耳蜗植入后的听觉训练通常是面对面进行的,但社交距离干扰了这种治疗方式。

材料与方法

在后续治疗中,42名年龄为53.8(±15.6)岁的成年人工耳蜗(CI)使用者在一个认证平台上接受了为期5周、每周1次的视频治疗。每次治疗后,对技术流程和治疗内容进行评估。在研究结束时,患者和治疗师使用系统可用性量表(SUS)、一份最终问卷以及修订后的治疗联盟量表(STA-R)对可用性以及治疗师与患者之间的关系进行了评估。此外,还进行了成本效益分析。

结果

用户对两者的可用性评价都很高(分别为87.97和93.0)。尽管缺乏面对面接触,但患者和治疗师对治疗联盟的评价都很高(分别为87.8%和84.8%)。对患者来说,主要优点是节省了时间和成本。相比之下,康复中心最初面临更高的成本,因为治疗师备课需要更长时间。在超过75%的首次治疗中都出现了技术问题,但之后并未影响训练。总体而言,47.6%的患者认为远程治疗能够完全满足他们的治疗需求。

结论

视频治疗被所有用户判定为一种有用的工具,并且大多数人希望继续使用。然而,治疗师与患者的关系能否在较长时间内得到充分维持,以及在线治疗是否与面对面治疗一样有效,仍存在疑问。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/550e/8866262/7a9435ca1e54/106_2021_1124_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验