• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小麦生殖阶段的耐旱性:气孔导度和植物生长调节剂的重要性。

Reproductive Stage Drought Tolerance in Wheat: Importance of Stomatal Conductance and Plant Growth Regulators.

机构信息

CSIRO Agriculture and Food, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.

CSIRO Centre for Environment and Life Sciences, 147 Underwood Avenue, Floreat, WA 6014, Australia.

出版信息

Genes (Basel). 2021 Oct 29;12(11):1742. doi: 10.3390/genes12111742.

DOI:10.3390/genes12111742
PMID:34828346
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8623834/
Abstract

Drought stress requires plants to adjust their water balance to maintain tissue water levels. Isohydric plants ('water-savers') typically achieve this through stomatal closure, while anisohydric plants ('water-wasters') use osmotic adjustment and maintain stomatal conductance. Isohydry or anisohydry allows plant species to adapt to different environments. In this paper we show that both mechanisms occur in bread wheat ( L.). Wheat lines with reproductive drought-tolerance delay stomatal closure and are temporarily anisohydric, before closing stomata and become isohydric at higher threshold levels of drought stress. Drought-sensitive wheat is isohydric from the start of the drought treatment. The capacity of the drought-tolerant line to maintain stomatal conductance correlates with repression of ABA synthesis in spikes and flag leaves. Gene expression profiling revealed major differences in the drought response in spikes and flag leaves of both wheat lines. While the isohydric drought-sensitive line enters a passive growth mode (arrest of photosynthesis, protein translation), the tolerant line mounts a stronger stress defence response (ROS protection, LEA proteins, cuticle synthesis). The drought response of the tolerant line is characterised by a strong response in the spike, displaying enrichment of genes involved in auxin, cytokinin and ethylene metabolism/signalling. While isohydry may offer advantages for longer term drought stress, anisohydry may be more beneficial when drought stress occurs during the critical stages of wheat spike development, ultimately improving grain yield.

摘要

干旱胁迫要求植物调整其水平衡以维持组织内的水分含量。等水植物(“节水型”植物)通常通过关闭气孔来实现这一点,而异水植物(“耗水型”植物)则利用渗透调节并维持气孔导度。等水特性或异水特性使植物物种能够适应不同的环境。在本文中,我们表明这两种机制都存在于小麦( L.)中。具有生殖耐旱性的小麦品系延迟气孔关闭,并在更高的干旱胁迫阈值水平下暂时异水,然后关闭气孔并成为等水。从干旱处理开始,敏感小麦就是等水的。耐旱品系维持气孔导度的能力与穗和旗叶中 ABA 合成的抑制有关。基因表达谱分析揭示了两种小麦品系穗和旗叶在干旱响应方面的主要差异。等水敏感的品系进入被动生长模式(光合作用、蛋白质翻译停止),而耐旱的品系则会产生更强的应激防御反应(ROS 保护、LEA 蛋白、角质层合成)。耐旱品系的干旱反应以穗部的强烈反应为特征,表现为参与生长素、细胞分裂素和乙烯代谢/信号转导的基因富集。虽然等水特性可能对长期干旱胁迫有优势,但在小麦穗发育的关键阶段发生干旱胁迫时,异水特性可能更有利,最终提高籽粒产量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef88/8623834/8fed1e2f82cf/genes-12-01742-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef88/8623834/cf618a952f8e/genes-12-01742-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef88/8623834/e3f4f072501f/genes-12-01742-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef88/8623834/ba0501d00945/genes-12-01742-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef88/8623834/4f9f7a9eaed6/genes-12-01742-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef88/8623834/f2c73e654248/genes-12-01742-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef88/8623834/3f3641a5ab97/genes-12-01742-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef88/8623834/3a1a8184e6a8/genes-12-01742-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef88/8623834/6175d76cb299/genes-12-01742-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef88/8623834/8fed1e2f82cf/genes-12-01742-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef88/8623834/cf618a952f8e/genes-12-01742-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef88/8623834/e3f4f072501f/genes-12-01742-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef88/8623834/ba0501d00945/genes-12-01742-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef88/8623834/4f9f7a9eaed6/genes-12-01742-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef88/8623834/f2c73e654248/genes-12-01742-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef88/8623834/3f3641a5ab97/genes-12-01742-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef88/8623834/3a1a8184e6a8/genes-12-01742-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef88/8623834/6175d76cb299/genes-12-01742-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef88/8623834/8fed1e2f82cf/genes-12-01742-g009.jpg

相似文献

1
Reproductive Stage Drought Tolerance in Wheat: Importance of Stomatal Conductance and Plant Growth Regulators.小麦生殖阶段的耐旱性:气孔导度和植物生长调节剂的重要性。
Genes (Basel). 2021 Oct 29;12(11):1742. doi: 10.3390/genes12111742.
2
Isohydric and anisohydric strategies of wheat genotypes under osmotic stress: biosynthesis and function of ABA in stress responses.渗透胁迫下小麦基因型的等水合和非等水合策略:ABA 在胁迫响应中的生物合成和功能。
J Plant Physiol. 2013 Nov 1;170(16):1389-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2013.04.010. Epub 2013 May 20.
3
Differences in osmotic adjustment, foliar abscisic acid dynamics, and stomatal regulation between an isohydric and anisohydric woody angiosperm during drought.干旱期间,等水和非等水木本被子植物在渗透调节、叶片脱落酸动态和气孔调节方面的差异。
Plant Cell Environ. 2017 Dec;40(12):3122-3134. doi: 10.1111/pce.13077. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
4
TaCDPK1-5A positively regulates drought response through modulating osmotic stress responsive-associated processes in wheat (Triticum aestivum).TaCDPK1-5A 通过调节小麦(Triticum aestivum)中与渗透胁迫反应相关的过程正向调控抗旱反应。
Plant Cell Rep. 2024 Oct 7;43(11):256. doi: 10.1007/s00299-024-03344-2.
5
The evolution of the role of ABA in the regulation of water-use efficiency: From biochemical mechanisms to stomatal conductance.脱落酸(ABA)在调节水分利用效率中作用的演变:从生化机制到气孔导度
Plant Sci. 2016 Oct;251:82-89. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2016.05.007. Epub 2016 May 13.
6
Improved tolerance to drought stress after anthesis due to priming before anthesis in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) var. Vinjett.小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)品种Vinjett在花期前进行引发处理后,对花后干旱胁迫的耐受性增强。
J Exp Bot. 2014 Dec;65(22):6441-56. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru362. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
7
The sucrose non-fermenting 1-related kinase 2 gene SAPK9 improves drought tolerance and grain yield in rice by modulating cellular osmotic potential, stomatal closure and stress-responsive gene expression.蔗糖非发酵1相关激酶2基因SAPK9通过调节细胞渗透势、气孔关闭和胁迫响应基因表达来提高水稻的耐旱性和籽粒产量。
BMC Plant Biol. 2016 Jul 13;16(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12870-016-0845-x.
8
A wheat histone variant gene TaH2A.7 enhances drought tolerance and promotes stomatal closure in Arabidopsis.一个小麦组蛋白变体基因TaH2A.7增强了拟南芥的耐旱性并促进气孔关闭。
Plant Cell Rep. 2016 Sep;35(9):1853-62. doi: 10.1007/s00299-016-1999-6. Epub 2016 May 23.
9
Wheat BREVIS RADIX (BRX) regulates organ size, stomatal density and enhances drought tolerance in Arabidopsis.小麦须根(BRX)调控器官大小、气孔密度,并增强拟南芥的耐旱性。
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2024 Mar;208:108500. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2024.108500. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
10
Does the turgor loss point characterize drought response in dryland plants?膨压损失点是否能表征旱地植物的干旱响应?
Plant Cell Environ. 2017 Aug;40(8):1500-1511. doi: 10.1111/pce.12948. Epub 2017 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Diversity changes of rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in L. under drought stress and rewatering.干旱胁迫及复水条件下枸杞根际和内生细菌的多样性变化
Front Plant Sci. 2025 May 7;16:1571736. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1571736. eCollection 2025.
2
Mechanistic insights and future perspectives of drought stress management in staple crops.主要作物干旱胁迫管理的机制见解与未来展望
Front Plant Sci. 2025 Mar 27;16:1547452. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1547452. eCollection 2025.
3
Abscisic acid improves drought resilience, growth, physio-biochemical and quality attributes in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) at critical growth stages.

本文引用的文献

1
Tolerance of Combined Drought and Heat Stress Is Associated With Transpiration Maintenance and Water Soluble Carbohydrates in Wheat Grains.小麦对干旱和热胁迫复合胁迫的耐受性与蒸腾维持及籽粒中的水溶性碳水化合物有关。
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Oct 15;11:568693. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.568693. eCollection 2020.
2
A Permeable Cuticle, Not Open Stomata, Is the Primary Source of Water Loss From Expanding Leaves.可渗透的角质层而非开放的气孔是正在伸展叶片水分流失的主要来源。
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Jun 23;11:774. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00774. eCollection 2020.
3
Abscisic Acid-Enemy or Savior in the Response of Cereals to Abiotic and Biotic Stresses?
脱落酸可提高小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)关键生长阶段的抗旱性、生长、生理生化和品质特性。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 2;14(1):20411. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71404-4.
4
Seed priming with potassium nitrate alleviates the high temperature stress by modulating growth and antioxidant potential in carrot seeds and seedlings.硝酸钾浸种通过调节胡萝卜种子和幼苗的生长和抗氧化能力来缓解高温胁迫。
BMC Plant Biol. 2024 Jun 26;24(1):606. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05292-1.
5
Does pollination interact with the abiotic environment to affect plant reproduction?授粉作用是否会与非生物环境相互作用以影响植物繁殖?
Ann Bot. 2025 Feb 8;135(1-2):141-152. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcae095.
6
Mitigating drought stress in wheat plants (Triticum Aestivum L.) through grain priming in aqueous extract of spirulina platensis.通过螺旋藻水提物对小麦种子进行引发处理来缓解小麦植株的干旱胁迫。
BMC Plant Biol. 2024 Apr 2;24(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-04905-z.
7
Editorial on Genetic Diversity of Plant Tolerance to Environmental Restraints.论植物对环境胁迫的遗传多样性
Genes (Basel). 2023 Oct 25;14(11):1992. doi: 10.3390/genes14111992.
8
Photobiotechnology for abiotic stress resilient crops: Recent advances and prospects.用于抗非生物胁迫作物的光生物技术:最新进展与前景
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 15;9(9):e20158. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20158. eCollection 2023 Sep.
9
Drought responsiveness in six wheat genotypes: identification of stress resistance indicators.六种小麦基因型的干旱响应:抗逆指标的鉴定
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Sep 13;14:1232583. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1232583. eCollection 2023.
10
A comprehensive meta-QTL analysis for yield-related traits of durum wheat ( L. var. ) grown under different water regimes.对不同水分条件下种植的硬粒小麦(L. var.)产量相关性状进行的全面元QTL分析。
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Sep 6;13:984269. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.984269. eCollection 2022.
脱落酸在谷物应对非生物和生物胁迫中的作用:敌人还是救星?
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Jun 29;21(13):4607. doi: 10.3390/ijms21134607.
4
A Physio-Morphological Trait-Based Approach for Breeding Drought Tolerant Wheat.一种基于生理形态性状的耐旱小麦育种方法。
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Jun 3;11:715. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00715. eCollection 2020.
5
The evolution of desiccation tolerance in angiosperm plants: a rare yet common phenomenon.被子植物耐旱性的进化:一种罕见却又常见的现象。
Funct Plant Biol. 2013 May;40(4):315-328. doi: 10.1071/FP12321.
6
Phenotyping for drought tolerance in grain crops: when is it useful to breeders?谷类作物耐旱性的表型分析:对育种者何时有用?
Funct Plant Biol. 2012 Nov;39(11):851-859. doi: 10.1071/FP12079.
7
Towards a conceptual ABA ideotype in plant breeding for water limited environments.面向水分受限环境下植物育种的概念性ABA理想型。
Funct Plant Biol. 2015 Jun;42(6):502-513. doi: 10.1071/FP14334.
8
Stomatal behaviour under terminal drought affects post-anthesis water use in wheat.拔节期干旱条件下的气孔行为影响小麦花后的水分利用。
Funct Plant Biol. 2017 Feb;44(3):279-289. doi: 10.1071/FP16078.
9
Root-to-shoot signalling: integration of diverse molecules, pathways and functions.根到地上部的信号转导:多种分子、途径及功能的整合
Funct Plant Biol. 2016 Mar;43(2):87-104. doi: 10.1071/FP15252.
10
Role and Regulation of Cytokinins in Plant Response to Drought Stress.细胞分裂素在植物应对干旱胁迫中的作用与调控
Plants (Basel). 2020 Mar 31;9(4):422. doi: 10.3390/plants9040422.