Munn Allison C, Lay Beth, Phillips Tiffany A, George Tracy P
Department of Nursing, Francis Marion University, Florence, SC 29506, USA.
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Nov 19;9(11):1584. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9111584.
Simulation helps to prepare prelicensure nursing students for practice by providing opportunities to perform clinical skills and make decisions in a safe environment. The integration of nursing knowledge, skills, and decision-making abilities during simulated unfolding case-study scenarios may enhance student self-confidence and foster clinical judgement skills. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of simulation using unfolding case-study scenarios on undergraduate nursing students' self-confidence in pediatric nursing knowledge, skills, and clinical judgment/decision-making abilities. This mixed methods study included a pre- and post-survey design to evaluate undergraduate nursing students' confidence in pediatric nursing knowledge, skills, and decision-making abilities after participation in both an instructor-led (guided) and a student-led (decision-making) simulation involving unfolding case-study scenarios. Friedman's ANOVA analyses revealed that all 16-items demonstrated statistically significant differences between the three measured responses (pre-simulation and both post-simulation surveys). Post-hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank tests revealed statistically significant differences in student ratings pre-simulation and post-instructor-led (guided) experience for all 16-scored items. The qualitative themes identified were perception of experience, pediatric nursing care, assimilation of knowledge, and critical thinking. Unfolding case-study simulation experiences positively impact the learning, self-confidence, and clinical judgement of undergraduate nursing students.
模拟通过提供在安全环境中执行临床技能和做出决策的机会,帮助护生在获得执照前做好实践准备。在模拟的逐步展开的案例研究场景中整合护理知识、技能和决策能力,可能会增强学生的自信心,并培养临床判断技能。本研究的目的是评估使用逐步展开的案例研究场景进行模拟对本科护生在儿科护理知识、技能以及临床判断/决策能力方面自信心的影响。这项混合方法研究包括一项前后调查设计,以评估本科护生在参与了由教师主导(指导)和学生主导(决策)的涉及逐步展开案例研究场景的模拟后,对儿科护理知识、技能和决策能力的信心。弗里德曼方差分析显示,所有16个项目在三次测量反应(模拟前以及两次模拟后调查)之间均表现出统计学上的显著差异。事后威尔科克森符号秩检验显示,在所有16个计分项目上,学生在模拟前和教师主导(指导)经验后的评分存在统计学上的显著差异。确定的定性主题包括对经验的认知、儿科护理、知识的吸收和批判性思维。逐步展开的案例研究模拟经验对本科护生的学习、自信心和临床判断产生积极影响。