Ke Li, Barnett Anna L, Wang Yun, Duan Wen, Hua Jing, Du Wenchong
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.
Centre for Psychological Research, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford OX3 0BP, UK.
Children (Basel). 2021 Nov 9;8(11):1028. doi: 10.3390/children8111028.
Parents and teachers have knowledge of children's daily motor performance yet may make different judgments about the levels of competence observed at home and school. The current study aimed to examine the discrepancies between parent and teacher reports using the Movement ABC-2 Checklist and the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (DCDQ) on children with and without suspected Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD). The Movement ABC-2 Test was administered to 1276 children aged 5-10 years in China. The Movement ABC-2 Checklist and DCDQ were completed by both parents and teachers of all children. A total of 172 children achieving a score below the 15th percentile on the Movement ABC-2 Test were identified as children with suspected DCD. Both parents and teachers showed suitable agreement in judging children's motor competence but low sensitivity in identifying children with DCD. Parent scores of children's motor competence were more closely associated with test performance scores compared to teacher scores. Teachers tended to over-rate children's motor competence. The motor difficulties identified by parents were associated with low Movement ABC-2 Test scores on Manual Dexterity and Balance components, while motor difficulties identified by teachers were associated with the Balance component only. The results demonstrated discrepancies between parent and teacher reports, suggesting the importance of using a range of measures to identify and describe motor difficulties in children.
家长和教师了解儿童的日常运动表现,但对于在家中和学校观察到的能力水平可能会做出不同的判断。本研究旨在使用《运动ABC-2检查表》和《发育性协调障碍问卷》(DCDQ),调查有或没有疑似发育性协调障碍(DCD)的儿童的家长报告与教师报告之间的差异。对中国1276名5至10岁的儿童进行了《运动ABC-2测试》。所有儿童的家长和教师都完成了《运动ABC-2检查表》和DCDQ。共有172名儿童在《运动ABC-2测试》中得分低于第15百分位,被确定为疑似DCD儿童。家长和教师在判断儿童运动能力方面显示出适度的一致性,但在识别DCD儿童方面敏感性较低。与教师评分相比,家长对儿童运动能力的评分与测试表现分数的相关性更强。教师往往高估儿童的运动能力。家长识别出的运动困难与《运动ABC-2测试》中手动灵巧性和平衡分量表的低分相关,而教师识别出的运动困难仅与平衡分量表相关。结果表明家长报告与教师报告之间存在差异,这表明使用一系列测量方法来识别和描述儿童运动困难的重要性。