Suppr超能文献

英国女性对个性化乳腺癌风险评估及风险分层乳房筛查概念的看法:一项定性访谈研究

UK Women's Views of the Concepts of Personalised Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Risk-Stratified Breast Screening: A Qualitative Interview Study.

作者信息

Kelley-Jones Charlotte, Scott Suzanne, Waller Jo

机构信息

Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, UK.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2021 Nov 19;13(22):5813. doi: 10.3390/cancers13225813.

Abstract

Any introduction of risk-stratification within the NHS Breast Screening Programme needs to be considered acceptable by women. We conducted interviews to explore women's attitudes to personalised risk assessment and risk-stratified breast screening. Twenty-five UK women were purposively sampled by screening experience and socioeconomic background. Interview transcripts were qualitatively analysed using Framework Analysis. Women expressed positive intentions for personal risk assessment and willingness to receive risk feedback to provide reassurance and certainty. Women responded to risk-stratified screening scenarios in three ways: 'Overall acceptors' considered both high- and low-risk options acceptable as a reasonable allocation of resources to clinical need, yet acceptability was subject to specified conditions including accuracy of risk estimates and availability of support throughout the screening pathway. Others who thought 'more is better' only supported high-risk scenarios where increased screening was proposed. 'Screening sceptics' found low-risk scenarios more aligned to their screening values than high-risk screening options. Consideration of screening recommendations for other risk groups had more influence on women's responses than screening-related harms. These findings demonstrate high, but not universal, acceptability. Support and guidance, tailored to screening values and preferences, may be required by women at all levels of risk.

摘要

在英国国家医疗服务体系乳腺筛查项目中引入任何风险分层方法都需考虑女性是否能够接受。我们开展了访谈,以探究女性对个性化风险评估和风险分层乳腺筛查的态度。通过筛查经历和社会经济背景,我们有目的地抽取了25名英国女性作为样本。使用框架分析法对访谈记录进行了定性分析。女性对个人风险评估表达了积极意向,并愿意接受风险反馈以获得安心和确定感。女性对风险分层筛查方案有三种反应:“总体接受者”认为高风险和低风险方案都是可以接受的,这是对临床需求的合理资源分配,但接受程度取决于特定条件,包括风险估计的准确性以及整个筛查过程中支持措施的可用性。其他认为“越多越好”的人只支持提出增加筛查的高风险方案。“筛查怀疑者”发现低风险方案比高风险筛查方案更符合她们的筛查价值观。对其他风险群体筛查建议的考虑对女性反应的影响大于筛查相关危害。这些发现表明接受程度较高,但并非普遍接受。针对所有风险水平的女性,可能都需要根据其筛查价值观和偏好提供支持与指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8792/8616436/a4cf102b25fc/cancers-13-05813-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验