• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国女性对个性化乳腺癌风险评估及风险分层乳房筛查概念的看法:一项定性访谈研究

UK Women's Views of the Concepts of Personalised Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Risk-Stratified Breast Screening: A Qualitative Interview Study.

作者信息

Kelley-Jones Charlotte, Scott Suzanne, Waller Jo

机构信息

Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, UK.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2021 Nov 19;13(22):5813. doi: 10.3390/cancers13225813.

DOI:10.3390/cancers13225813
PMID:34830965
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8616436/
Abstract

Any introduction of risk-stratification within the NHS Breast Screening Programme needs to be considered acceptable by women. We conducted interviews to explore women's attitudes to personalised risk assessment and risk-stratified breast screening. Twenty-five UK women were purposively sampled by screening experience and socioeconomic background. Interview transcripts were qualitatively analysed using Framework Analysis. Women expressed positive intentions for personal risk assessment and willingness to receive risk feedback to provide reassurance and certainty. Women responded to risk-stratified screening scenarios in three ways: 'Overall acceptors' considered both high- and low-risk options acceptable as a reasonable allocation of resources to clinical need, yet acceptability was subject to specified conditions including accuracy of risk estimates and availability of support throughout the screening pathway. Others who thought 'more is better' only supported high-risk scenarios where increased screening was proposed. 'Screening sceptics' found low-risk scenarios more aligned to their screening values than high-risk screening options. Consideration of screening recommendations for other risk groups had more influence on women's responses than screening-related harms. These findings demonstrate high, but not universal, acceptability. Support and guidance, tailored to screening values and preferences, may be required by women at all levels of risk.

摘要

在英国国家医疗服务体系乳腺筛查项目中引入任何风险分层方法都需考虑女性是否能够接受。我们开展了访谈,以探究女性对个性化风险评估和风险分层乳腺筛查的态度。通过筛查经历和社会经济背景,我们有目的地抽取了25名英国女性作为样本。使用框架分析法对访谈记录进行了定性分析。女性对个人风险评估表达了积极意向,并愿意接受风险反馈以获得安心和确定感。女性对风险分层筛查方案有三种反应:“总体接受者”认为高风险和低风险方案都是可以接受的,这是对临床需求的合理资源分配,但接受程度取决于特定条件,包括风险估计的准确性以及整个筛查过程中支持措施的可用性。其他认为“越多越好”的人只支持提出增加筛查的高风险方案。“筛查怀疑者”发现低风险方案比高风险筛查方案更符合她们的筛查价值观。对其他风险群体筛查建议的考虑对女性反应的影响大于筛查相关危害。这些发现表明接受程度较高,但并非普遍接受。针对所有风险水平的女性,可能都需要根据其筛查价值观和偏好提供支持与指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8792/8616436/a4cf102b25fc/cancers-13-05813-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8792/8616436/a4cf102b25fc/cancers-13-05813-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8792/8616436/a4cf102b25fc/cancers-13-05813-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
UK Women's Views of the Concepts of Personalised Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Risk-Stratified Breast Screening: A Qualitative Interview Study.英国女性对个性化乳腺癌风险评估及风险分层乳房筛查概念的看法:一项定性访谈研究
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Nov 19;13(22):5813. doi: 10.3390/cancers13225813.
2
Dutch women's intended participation in a risk-based breast cancer screening and prevention programme: a survey study identifying preferences, facilitators and barriers.荷兰女性参与基于风险的乳腺癌筛查和预防计划的意愿:一项调查研究,确定偏好、促进因素和障碍。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Oct 6;20(1):965. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07464-2.
3
The introduction of risk stratified screening into the NHS breast screening Programme: views from British-Pakistani women.将风险分层筛查引入国民保健制度乳房筛查计划:英国-巴基斯坦裔妇女的观点。
BMC Cancer. 2020 May 20;20(1):452. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06959-2.
4
A qualitative study on Singaporean women's views towards breast cancer screening and Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) gene testing to guide personalised screening strategies.一项关于新加坡女性对乳腺癌筛查和单核苷酸多态性(SNP)基因检测以指导个体化筛查策略的看法的定性研究。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Nov 21;17(1):776. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3781-8.
5
Women's experiences of risk-stratified breast cancer screening in the MyPeBS trial: a qualitative comparative study across two European countries.MyPeBS试验中女性对风险分层乳腺癌筛查的体验:一项跨两个欧洲国家的定性比较研究。
Psychol Health. 2024 Sep 2:1-23. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2024.2395856.
6
Optimising the delivery of breast cancer risk assessment for women aged 30-39 years: A qualitative study of women's views.优化 30-39 岁女性乳腺癌风险评估的实施:一项针对女性观点的定性研究。
Womens Health (Lond). 2023 Jan-Dec;19:17455057231160348. doi: 10.1177/17455057231160348.
7
Women's decision-making regarding risk-stratified breast cancer screening and prevention from the perspective of international healthcare professionals.从国际医疗保健专业人员的角度来看,女性在风险分层乳腺癌筛查和预防方面的决策。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 1;13(6):e0197772. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197772. eCollection 2018.
8
Women's views on overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening: a qualitative study.女性对乳腺癌筛查过度诊断的看法:一项定性研究。
BMJ. 2013 Jan 23;346:f158. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f158.
9
Women's Views on Multifactorial Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Risk-Stratified Screening: A Population-Based Survey from Four Provinces in Canada.女性对多因素乳腺癌风险评估和风险分层筛查的看法:来自加拿大四个省份的一项基于人群的调查。
J Pers Med. 2021 Feb 2;11(2):95. doi: 10.3390/jpm11020095.
10
Preconceptions influence women's perceptions of information on breast cancer screening: a qualitative study.先入之见影响女性对乳腺癌筛查信息的认知:一项定性研究。
BMC Res Notes. 2015 Sep 3;8:404. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1327-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Genetic discrimination in insurance and employment based on personalized risk stratification for breast cancer screening.基于乳腺癌筛查个性化风险分层的保险和就业中的基因歧视。
Front Genet. 2025 Mar 5;16:1481863. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2025.1481863. eCollection 2025.
2
Acceptability and perceptions of personalised risk-based cancer screening among health-care professionals and the general public: a systematic review and meta-analysis.医疗保健专业人员和公众对基于个性化风险的癌症筛查的可接受性和认知:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2025 Feb;10(2):e85-e96. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(24)00278-0.
3
A Scoping Review of Primary Breast Cancer Risk Reduction Strategies in East and Southeast Asia.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost effectiveness of breast cancer screening and prevention: a systematic review with a focus on risk-adapted strategies.乳腺癌筛查和预防的成本效益:一项侧重于风险适应策略的系统评价。
Eur J Health Econ. 2021 Nov;22(8):1311-1344. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01338-5. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
2
Toward a Population-Based Breast Cancer Risk Stratification Approach? The Needs and Concerns of Healthcare Providers.迈向基于人群的乳腺癌风险分层方法?医疗服务提供者的需求与担忧。
J Pers Med. 2021 Jun 10;11(6):540. doi: 10.3390/jpm11060540.
3
Personalized Risk Assessment for Prevention and Early Detection of Breast Cancer: Integration and Implementation (PERSPECTIVE I&I).
东亚和东南亚原发性乳腺癌风险降低策略的范围综述
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jan 7;17(2):168. doi: 10.3390/cancers17020168.
4
Public acceptability and anticipated uptake of risk-stratified bowel cancer screening in the UK: An online survey.英国风险分层型肠癌筛查的公众可接受性及预期参与情况:一项在线调查
Prev Med Rep. 2024 Nov 10;48:102927. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102927. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
A Comprehensive Model for Understanding Breast Cancer Screening Hesitancy: Integrating the Health Belief Model and the Confidence, Convenience, Complacency, Constraints, and Risk and Responsibility Calculations (5C) Model.一个理解乳腺癌筛查犹豫的综合模型:整合健康信念模型与信心、便利性、自满、限制以及风险和责任计算(5C)模型。
Cureus. 2024 Oct 16;16(10):e71583. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71583. eCollection 2024 Oct.
6
"Because That is the Right Thing to do": A Focus Group Study of Australian Expert Perspectives on Offering Smoking Cessation Support in Lung Cancer Screening.“因为那是正确的做法”:一项关于澳大利亚专家对在肺癌筛查中提供戒烟支持的观点的焦点小组研究
Nicotine Tob Res. 2025 Feb 24;27(3):387-397. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntae215.
7
Acceptability of de-intensified screening for women at low risk of breast cancer: a randomised online experimental survey.接受度降低的乳腺癌低危女性筛查:一项随机在线实验调查。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Sep 6;24(1):1111. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12847-w.
8
Risk-Adapted Breast Screening for Women at Low Predicted Risk of Breast Cancer: An Online Discrete Choice Experiment.基于风险的乳腺癌低预测风险女性乳房筛查:一项在线离散选择实验。
Med Decis Making. 2024 Jul;44(5):586-600. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241254828. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
9
"For and against" factors influencing participation in personalized breast cancer screening programs: a qualitative systematic review until March 2022.影响参与个性化乳腺癌筛查项目的“支持与反对”因素:截至2022年3月的定性系统评价
Arch Public Health. 2024 Feb 22;82(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01248-x.
10
Implementation considerations for risk-tailored cancer screening in the population: A scoping review.风险定制癌症筛查在人群中的实施考虑因素:范围综述。
Prev Med. 2024 Apr;181:107897. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.107897. Epub 2024 Feb 18.
乳腺癌预防与早期检测的个性化风险评估:整合与实施(PERSPECTIVE I&I)
J Pers Med. 2021 Jun 4;11(6):511. doi: 10.3390/jpm11060511.
4
Extending screening intervals for women at low risk of breast cancer: do they find it acceptable?延长低危乳腺癌女性的筛查间隔:她们能接受吗?
BMC Cancer. 2021 May 29;21(1):637. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08347-w.
5
Women's Views on Multifactorial Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Risk-Stratified Screening: A Population-Based Survey from Four Provinces in Canada.女性对多因素乳腺癌风险评估和风险分层筛查的看法:来自加拿大四个省份的一项基于人群的调查。
J Pers Med. 2021 Feb 2;11(2):95. doi: 10.3390/jpm11020095.
6
Dutch women's intended participation in a risk-based breast cancer screening and prevention programme: a survey study identifying preferences, facilitators and barriers.荷兰女性参与基于风险的乳腺癌筛查和预防计划的意愿:一项调查研究,确定偏好、促进因素和障碍。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Oct 6;20(1):965. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07464-2.
7
Risk stratified breast cancer screening: UK healthcare policy decision-making stakeholders' views on a low-risk breast screening pathway.风险分层乳腺癌筛查:英国医疗保健政策决策利益相关者对低风险乳腺癌筛查途径的看法。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Jul 22;20(1):680. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07158-9.
8
Personalized early detection and prevention of breast cancer: ENVISION consensus statement.乳腺癌个体化早期检测和预防:ENVISION 共识声明。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020 Nov;17(11):687-705. doi: 10.1038/s41571-020-0388-9. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
9
What are the benefits and harms of risk stratified screening as part of the NHS breast screening Programme? Study protocol for a multi-site non-randomised comparison of BC-predict versus usual screening (NCT04359420).风险分层筛查作为国民保健制度乳房筛查计划的一部分有哪些益处和危害?BC-predict 与常规筛查的多中心非随机比较研究方案(NCT04359420)。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Jun 18;20(1):570. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07054-2.
10
Risk stratification in breast cancer screening: Cost-effectiveness and harm-benefit ratios for low-risk and high-risk women.乳腺癌筛查中的风险分层:低危和高危女性的成本效益和危害-获益比。
Int J Cancer. 2020 Dec 1;147(11):3059-3067. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33126. Epub 2020 Jun 30.