Friel James, Bombarely Aureliano, Fornell Carmen Dorca, Luque Francisco, Fernández-Ocaña Ana Maria
Dipartimento di Bioscienze, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Instituto de Biologıa Molecular y Celular de Plantas (IBMCP), CSIC, Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, 46011 Valencia, Spain.
Plants (Basel). 2021 Nov 19;10(11):2514. doi: 10.3390/plants10112514.
Olive, L., is a tree of great economic and cultural importance in the Mediterranean basin. Thousands of cultivars have been described, of which around 1200 are conserved in the different olive germplasm banks. The genetic characterisation of these cultivars can be performed in different ways. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) provides more information than the reduced representation methods such as genotype by sequencing (GBS), but at a much higher cost. This may change as the cost of sequencing continues to drop, but, currently, genotyping hundreds of cultivars using WGS is not a realistic goal for most research groups. Our aim is to systematically compare both methodologies applied to olive genotyping and summarise any possible recommendations for the geneticists and molecular breeders of the olive scientific community. In this work, we used a selection of 24 cultivars from an olive core collection from the World Olive Germplasm Collection of the Andalusian Institute of Agricultural and Fisheries Research and Training (WOGBC), which represent the most of the cultivars present in cultivated fields over the world. Our results show that both methodologies deliver similar results in the context of phylogenetic analysis and popular population genetic analysis methods such as clustering. Furthermore, WGS and GBS datasets from different experiments can be merged in a single dataset to perform these analytical methodologies with proper filtering. We also tested the influence of the different olive reference genomes in this type of analysis, finding that they have almost no effect when estimating genetic relationships. This work represents the first comparative study between both sequencing techniques in olive. Our results demonstrate that the use of GBS is a perfectly viable option for replacing WGS and reducing research costs when the goal of the experiment is to characterise the genetic relationship between different accessions. Besides this, we show that it is possible to combine variants from GBS and WGS datasets, allowing the reuse of publicly available data.
橄榄(Olive, L.)是地中海盆地具有重要经济和文化意义的树种。已描述了数千个品种,其中约1200个保存在不同的橄榄种质库中。这些品种的遗传特征可以通过不同方式进行鉴定。全基因组测序(WGS)比基因型测序(GBS)等简化代表性方法提供更多信息,但成本要高得多。随着测序成本持续下降,这种情况可能会改变,但目前,对于大多数研究小组来说,使用WGS对数百个品种进行基因分型并非现实目标。我们的目的是系统比较应用于橄榄基因分型的这两种方法,并为橄榄科学界的遗传学家和分子育种家总结任何可能的建议。在这项工作中,我们从安达卢西亚农业和渔业研究与培训研究所世界橄榄种质库(WOGBC)的橄榄核心种质中选取了24个品种,这些品种代表了世界耕地上存在的大多数品种。我们的结果表明,在系统发育分析和聚类等常见群体遗传分析方法的背景下,这两种方法都能得出相似的结果。此外,来自不同实验的WGS和GBS数据集可以合并到一个数据集中,通过适当过滤来执行这些分析方法。我们还测试了不同橄榄参考基因组在这类分析中的影响,发现它们在估计遗传关系时几乎没有影响。这项工作是橄榄领域这两种测序技术之间的首次比较研究。我们的结果表明,当实验目的是表征不同种质之间的遗传关系时,使用GBS是替代WGS并降低研究成本的完全可行选择。除此之外,我们表明可以将GBS和WGS数据集的变异组合起来,从而实现对公开可用数据的再利用。