• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

镇静剂和神经肌肉阻滞剂在患有新型冠状病毒肺炎急性呼吸窘迫综合征的机械通气患者中的应用

Use of Sedatives and Neuromuscular-Blocking Agents in Mechanically Ventilated Patients with COVID-19 ARDS.

作者信息

Ego Amédée, Peluso Lorenzo, Gorham Julie, Diosdado Alberto, Restuccia Giovanni, Creteur Jacques, Taccone Fabio Silvio

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1070 Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Microorganisms. 2021 Nov 20;9(11):2393. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9112393.

DOI:10.3390/microorganisms9112393
PMID:34835518
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8624865/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess differences in the use of analgesics, sedatives and neuromuscular-blocking agents (NMBA) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID-19 or other conditions.

METHODS

Retrospective observational cohort study, single-center tertiary Intensive Care Unit. COVID-19 patients with ARDS (March-May 2020) and non-COVID ARDS patients (2017-2020) on mechanical ventilation and receiving sedation for at least 48 h.

RESULTS

A total of 39 patients met the inclusion criteria in each group, with similar demographics at baseline. COVID-19 patients had a longer duration of MV (median 22 (IQRs 16-29) vs. 9 (6-18) days; < 0.01), of sedatives administration (18 (11-22) vs. 5 (4-9) days; < 0.01) and NMBA therapy (12 (9-16) vs. 3 (2-7) days; < 0.01). During the first 7 days of sedation, compared to non-COVID patients, COVID patients received more frequently a combination of multiple sedative drugs (76.9% vs. 28.2%; < 0.01) and a higher NMBA regimen (cisatracurium: 3.0 (2.1-3.7) vs. 1.3 (0.9-1.9) mg/kg/day; < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The duration and consumption of sedatives and NMBA was significantly increased in patients with COVID-19 related ARDS than in non-COVID ARDS. Different sedation strategies and protocols might be needed in COVID-19 patients with ARDS, with potential implications on long-term complications and drugs availability.

摘要

目的

评估因新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)或其他病症导致的急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者在使用镇痛药、镇静剂和神经肌肉阻滞剂(NMBA)方面的差异。

方法

回顾性观察队列研究,单中心三级重症监护病房。对2020年3月至5月患有ARDS的COVID-19患者以及2017年至2020年接受机械通气并接受至少48小时镇静的非COVID-19 ARDS患者进行研究。

结果

每组共有39例患者符合纳入标准,基线时人口统计学特征相似。COVID-19患者机械通气时间更长(中位数22(四分位间距16 - 29)天对9(6 - 18)天;<0.01),镇静剂使用时间更长(18(11 - 22)天对5(4 - 9)天;<0.01),NMBA治疗时间更长(12(9 - 16)天对3(2 - 7)天;<0.01)。在镇静的前7天,与非COVID-19患者相比,COVID-19患者更频繁地接受多种镇静药物联合使用(76.9%对28.2%;<0.01),且NMBA使用方案剂量更高(顺式阿曲库铵:3.0(2.1 - 3.7)毫克/千克/天对1.3(0.9 - 1.9)毫克/千克/天;<0.01)。

结论

与非COVID-19 ARDS患者相比,COVID-19相关ARDS患者的镇静剂和NMBA使用时间及消耗量显著增加。对于患有ARDS的COVID-19患者可能需要不同 的镇静策略和方案,这对长期并发症和药物供应可能有潜在影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7746/8624865/c6be7ca391f1/microorganisms-09-02393-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7746/8624865/c10deec8c3a5/microorganisms-09-02393-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7746/8624865/793578cccd58/microorganisms-09-02393-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7746/8624865/c6be7ca391f1/microorganisms-09-02393-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7746/8624865/c10deec8c3a5/microorganisms-09-02393-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7746/8624865/793578cccd58/microorganisms-09-02393-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7746/8624865/c6be7ca391f1/microorganisms-09-02393-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Use of Sedatives and Neuromuscular-Blocking Agents in Mechanically Ventilated Patients with COVID-19 ARDS.镇静剂和神经肌肉阻滞剂在患有新型冠状病毒肺炎急性呼吸窘迫综合征的机械通气患者中的应用
Microorganisms. 2021 Nov 20;9(11):2393. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9112393.
2
Best evidence in critical care medicine: The role of neuromuscular blocking drugs in early severe acute respiratory distress syndrome.重症监护医学中的最佳证据:神经肌肉阻滞剂在早期严重急性呼吸窘迫综合征中的作用。
Can J Anaesth. 2012 Jan;59(1):105-8. doi: 10.1007/s12630-011-9615-2. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
3
A Comparison of Midazolam and Propofol for Deep Sedation in Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Requiring Neuromuscular Blocking Agents.咪达唑仑和丙泊酚用于需要神经肌肉阻滞剂的急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者深度镇静的比较。
J Pharm Pract. 2024 Apr;37(2):271-278. doi: 10.1177/08971900221131420. Epub 2022 Oct 2.
4
Effect of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents on Sedation Requirements in Trauma Patients with an Open Abdomen.神经肌肉阻滞剂对合并开放性腹部创伤患者镇静需求的影响。
Pharmacotherapy. 2019 Mar;39(3):271-279. doi: 10.1002/phar.2225. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
5
How to Manage Withdrawal of Sedation and Analgesia in Mechanically Ventilated COVID-19 Patients?如何管理机械通气的新冠病毒肺炎患者的镇静和镇痛撤药?
J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 24;10(21):4917. doi: 10.3390/jcm10214917.
6
Acute withdrawal syndrome related to the administration of analgesic and sedative medications in adult intensive care unit patients.成人重症监护病房患者使用镇痛和镇静药物相关的急性戒断综合征。
Crit Care Med. 1998 Apr;26(4):676-84. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199804000-00015.
7
Neuromuscular blocking agents in acute respiratory distress syndrome: updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.急性呼吸窘迫综合征中神经肌肉阻滞剂的应用:随机试验的最新系统评价与荟萃分析
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2020 Oct 23;8(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s40635-020-00348-6.
8
Association between tidal volume size, duration of ventilation, and sedation needs in patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: an individual patient data meta-analysis.无急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的潮气量大小、通气时间与镇静需求之间的关系:一项个体患者数据荟萃分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2014 Jul;40(7):950-7. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3318-4. Epub 2014 May 9.
9
Early short course of neuromuscular blocking agents in patients with COVID-19 ARDS: a propensity score analysis.COVID-19 相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者早期使用神经肌肉阻滞剂:一项倾向评分分析。
Crit Care. 2022 May 17;26(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-03983-5.
10
Sedation and neuromuscular blocking agents in acute respiratory distress syndrome.急性呼吸窘迫综合征中的镇静和神经肌肉阻滞剂
Ann Transl Med. 2017 Jul;5(14):291. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.07.19.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between (ΔPaO2/FiO2)/PEEP and in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: A secondary analysis.新冠肺炎患者(ΔPaO2/FiO2)/PEEP 与院内死亡率的关系:一项二次分析。
PLoS One. 2024 May 31;19(5):e0304518. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304518. eCollection 2024.
2
Editorial of Special Issue "The COVID-19 Pandemic and Bacterial Infections: Microbiological and Clinical Aspects".《“新冠疫情与细菌感染:微生物学和临床方面”特刊社论》
Microorganisms. 2023 Apr 12;11(4):1009. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11041009.
3
Trends in the Use of Sedative-Hypnotics, Opioids, and Neuromuscular Blockers in Hospitalized Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Observational Retrospective Study.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of organizational characteristics on the outcome of COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU in Belgium.组织特征对比利时入住重症监护病房的COVID-19患者治疗结果的影响。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2020 Dec 23;2:100019. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2020.100019. eCollection 2021 Mar.
2
High sedation needs of critically ill COVID-19 ARDS patients-A monocentric observational study.危重症 COVID-19 急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的高镇静需求:一项单中心观察性研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 27;16(7):e0253778. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253778. eCollection 2021.
3
Evaluation of Rocuronium Continuous Infusion in Critically Ill Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Drug Shortages.
COVID-19大流行期间住院患者使用镇静催眠药、阿片类药物和神经肌肉阻滞剂的趋势:观察性回顾性研究
Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2022 Dec;9(4):629-638. doi: 10.1007/s40801-022-00337-z. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
4
Neuromuscular Blockade in the Pre- and COVID-19 ARDS Patients.新冠疫情前及新冠病毒感染相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征(COVID-19 ARDS)患者的神经肌肉阻滞
J Pers Med. 2022 Sep 19;12(9):1538. doi: 10.3390/jpm12091538.
5
Administration of enteral nutrition and gastrointestinal complications in Covid-19 critical patients in prone position.新冠疫情危重症患者俯卧位时肠内营养的给予及胃肠道并发症
Clin Nutr Open Sci. 2022 Oct;45:80-90. doi: 10.1016/j.nutos.2022.08.003. Epub 2022 Aug 28.
6
Early spontaneous breathing for acute respiratory distress syndrome in individuals with COVID-19.COVID-19 相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的早期自主呼吸。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 29;6(6):CD015077. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015077.
评价 COVID-19 大流行和药物短缺期间危重症患者罗库溴铵持续输注。
J Pharm Pract. 2023 Apr;36(2):249-255. doi: 10.1177/08971900211033138. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
4
Sedation Usage in COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Multicenter Study.COVID-19 急性呼吸窘迫综合征中的镇静使用:一项多中心研究。
Ann Pharmacother. 2022 Feb;56(2):117-123. doi: 10.1177/10600280211021925. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
5
An examination of sedation requirements and practices for mechanically ventilated critically ill patients with COVID-19.COVID-19 机械通气危重症患者镇静需求与实践的研究。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2021 Oct 25;78(21):1952-1961. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxab202.
6
Critical illness polyneuropathy, myopathy and neuronal biomarkers in COVID-19 patients: A prospective study.新冠病毒感染患者的危重症多神经病、肌病及神经元生物标志物:一项前瞻性研究。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2021 Jul;132(7):1733-1740. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2021.03.016. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
7
Sedation in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19.新型冠状病毒肺炎机械通气患者的镇静
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Mar;9(3):218-219. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30570-1. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
8
Prevalence and risk factors for delirium in critically ill patients with COVID-19 (COVID-D): a multicentre cohort study.新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)危重症患者谵妄的患病率及危险因素(COVID-D):一项多中心队列研究
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Mar;9(3):239-250. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30552-X. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
9
Analgesia and sedation in patients with ARDS.急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的镇痛与镇静。
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Dec;46(12):2342-2356. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06307-9. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
10
Common cardiovascular risk factors and in-hospital mortality in 3,894 patients with COVID-19: survival analysis and machine learning-based findings from the multicentre Italian CORIST Study.COVID-19 患者 3894 例的常见心血管危险因素与住院死亡率:来自意大利多中心 CORIST 研究的生存分析和基于机器学习的发现。
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2020 Oct 30;30(11):1899-1913. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2020.07.031. Epub 2020 Jul 31.