Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Department of Cardiology and Internal Medicine, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, 85-094 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Nutrients. 2021 Oct 29;13(11):3883. doi: 10.3390/nu13113883.
Structured lifestyle interventions through cardiac rehabilitation (CR) are critical to improving the outcome of patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cardiometabolic risk factors. CR programs' variability in real-world practice may impact CR effects. This study evaluates intensive CR (ICR) and standard CR (SCR) programs for improving cardiometabolic, psychosocial, and clinical outcomes in high-risk CVD patients undergoing guideline-based therapies. Both programs provided lifestyle counseling and the same supervised exercise component. ICR additionally included a specialized plant-based diet, stress management, and social support. Changes in body weight (BW), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and exercise capacity (EC) were primary outcomes. A total of 314 patients (101 ICR and 213 SCR, aged 66 ± 13 years, 75% overweight/obese, 90% coronary artery disease, 29% heart failure, 54% non-optimal LDL-C, 43% depressive symptoms) were included. Adherence to ICR was 96% vs. 68% for SCR. Only ICR resulted in a decrease in BW (3.4%), LDL-C (11.3%), other atherogenic lipids, glycated hemoglobin, and systolic blood pressure. Both ICR and SCR increased EC (52.2% and 48.7%, respectively) and improved adiposity indices, diastolic blood pressure, cholesterol intake, depression, and quality of life, but more for ICR. Within 12.6 ± 4.8 months post-CR, major adverse cardiac events were less likely in the ICR than SCR group (11% vs. 17%), especially heart failure hospitalizations (2% vs. 8%). A comprehensive ICR enhanced by a plant-based diet and psychosocial management is feasible and effective for improving the outcomes in high-risk CVD patients in real-world practice.
通过心脏康复(CR)进行结构化的生活方式干预对于改善心血管疾病(CVD)和心血管代谢危险因素患者的预后至关重要。CR 计划在实际实践中的变异性可能会影响 CR 的效果。本研究评估了强化 CR(ICR)和标准 CR(SCR)计划,以改善接受基于指南的治疗的高危 CVD 患者的心血管代谢、心理社会和临床结局。这两种方案都提供了生活方式咨询和相同的监督锻炼部分。ICR 还包括专门的植物性饮食、压力管理和社会支持。体重(BW)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)和运动能力(EC)的变化是主要结局。共纳入 314 例患者(ICR 组 101 例,SCR 组 213 例,年龄 66±13 岁,75%超重/肥胖,90%冠心病,29%心力衰竭,54%非最佳 LDL-C,43%抑郁症状)。ICR 的依从性为 96%,而 SCR 的依从性为 68%。只有 ICR 导致 BW(3.4%)、LDL-C(11.3%)、其他致动脉粥样硬化脂质、糖化血红蛋白和收缩压降低。ICR 和 SCR 均增加了 EC(分别为 52.2%和 48.7%),并改善了肥胖指数、舒张压、胆固醇摄入量、抑郁和生活质量,但 ICR 改善更多。在 CR 后 12.6±4.8 个月,ICR 组发生主要不良心脏事件的可能性低于 SCR 组(11% vs. 17%),特别是心力衰竭住院(2% vs. 8%)。通过植物性饮食和心理社会管理增强的综合 ICR 对于改善真实世界实践中高危 CVD 患者的结局是可行且有效的。