Suppr超能文献

强化心脏康复在真实世界实践中对心血管疾病高危患者的疗效。

Effectiveness of Intensive Cardiac Rehabilitation in High-Risk Patients with Cardiovascular Disease in Real-World Practice.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.

Department of Cardiology and Internal Medicine, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, 85-094 Bydgoszcz, Poland.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2021 Oct 29;13(11):3883. doi: 10.3390/nu13113883.

Abstract

Structured lifestyle interventions through cardiac rehabilitation (CR) are critical to improving the outcome of patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cardiometabolic risk factors. CR programs' variability in real-world practice may impact CR effects. This study evaluates intensive CR (ICR) and standard CR (SCR) programs for improving cardiometabolic, psychosocial, and clinical outcomes in high-risk CVD patients undergoing guideline-based therapies. Both programs provided lifestyle counseling and the same supervised exercise component. ICR additionally included a specialized plant-based diet, stress management, and social support. Changes in body weight (BW), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and exercise capacity (EC) were primary outcomes. A total of 314 patients (101 ICR and 213 SCR, aged 66 ± 13 years, 75% overweight/obese, 90% coronary artery disease, 29% heart failure, 54% non-optimal LDL-C, 43% depressive symptoms) were included. Adherence to ICR was 96% vs. 68% for SCR. Only ICR resulted in a decrease in BW (3.4%), LDL-C (11.3%), other atherogenic lipids, glycated hemoglobin, and systolic blood pressure. Both ICR and SCR increased EC (52.2% and 48.7%, respectively) and improved adiposity indices, diastolic blood pressure, cholesterol intake, depression, and quality of life, but more for ICR. Within 12.6 ± 4.8 months post-CR, major adverse cardiac events were less likely in the ICR than SCR group (11% vs. 17%), especially heart failure hospitalizations (2% vs. 8%). A comprehensive ICR enhanced by a plant-based diet and psychosocial management is feasible and effective for improving the outcomes in high-risk CVD patients in real-world practice.

摘要

通过心脏康复(CR)进行结构化的生活方式干预对于改善心血管疾病(CVD)和心血管代谢危险因素患者的预后至关重要。CR 计划在实际实践中的变异性可能会影响 CR 的效果。本研究评估了强化 CR(ICR)和标准 CR(SCR)计划,以改善接受基于指南的治疗的高危 CVD 患者的心血管代谢、心理社会和临床结局。这两种方案都提供了生活方式咨询和相同的监督锻炼部分。ICR 还包括专门的植物性饮食、压力管理和社会支持。体重(BW)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)和运动能力(EC)的变化是主要结局。共纳入 314 例患者(ICR 组 101 例,SCR 组 213 例,年龄 66±13 岁,75%超重/肥胖,90%冠心病,29%心力衰竭,54%非最佳 LDL-C,43%抑郁症状)。ICR 的依从性为 96%,而 SCR 的依从性为 68%。只有 ICR 导致 BW(3.4%)、LDL-C(11.3%)、其他致动脉粥样硬化脂质、糖化血红蛋白和收缩压降低。ICR 和 SCR 均增加了 EC(分别为 52.2%和 48.7%),并改善了肥胖指数、舒张压、胆固醇摄入量、抑郁和生活质量,但 ICR 改善更多。在 CR 后 12.6±4.8 个月,ICR 组发生主要不良心脏事件的可能性低于 SCR 组(11% vs. 17%),特别是心力衰竭住院(2% vs. 8%)。通过植物性饮食和心理社会管理增强的综合 ICR 对于改善真实世界实践中高危 CVD 患者的结局是可行且有效的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9a9/8620098/3a483190a135/nutrients-13-03883-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验