Patel Yash B, Kumar Agara, Huebner Marianne, El Nayir Mohammed, Suneja Anupam, Smith Frank
Internal Medicine, Trinity Health Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Department of Statistics and Probability, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2025 Jul 3;15(4):8-13. doi: 10.55729/2000-9666.1514. eCollection 2025.
Cardiac rehabilitation programs are offered in two major formats: Conventional Cardiac Rehab (CCR), which is primarily based on exercise interventions, and Intensive Cardiac Rehabilitation (ICR), which is a holistic approach including dietary modifications with a plant-based diet and wellness counseling. We performed a retrospective cohort study to compare the CCR and ICR groups for the primary composite outcome of Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) at two years. The MACE outcome was 2-year mortality, unstable angina requiring hospitalization, Myocardial Infarction (MI), Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG), Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI), and stroke. Secondary outcomes were overall mortality, and number of readmissions. There were 2104 patients included in the statistical analysis with 963 in the CCR group and 1141 in the ICR group. We found that there were no significant differences in MACE events between ICR and CCR (OR = 1.10; 95 % CI = 0.81-1.49; p = 0.55). Readmissions were higher in the ICR group than the CCR group, with 34.1 % vs 28.6 % (p = 0.006), respectively. Additionally, older age was associated with more MACE events (OR = 1.16; 95 % CI = 1.07-1.25; p < 0.001). Overall, our study did not demonstrate a difference in the composite MACE outcome between ICR and CCR.
传统心脏康复(CCR),主要基于运动干预;强化心脏康复(ICR),是一种整体方法,包括采用植物性饮食的饮食调整和健康咨询。我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,比较CCR组和ICR组在两年时主要不良心脏事件(MACE)的主要复合结局。MACE结局包括2年死亡率、需住院治疗的不稳定型心绞痛、心肌梗死(MI)、冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)和中风。次要结局为总体死亡率和再入院次数。共有2104例患者纳入统计分析,其中CCR组963例,ICR组1141例。我们发现ICR组和CCR组之间的MACE事件无显著差异(OR = 1.10;95%CI = 0.81 - 1.49;p = 0.55)。ICR组的再入院率高于CCR组,分别为34.1%和28.6%(p = 0.006)。此外,年龄较大与更多的MACE事件相关(OR = 1.16;95%CI = 1.07 - 1.25;p < 0.001)。总体而言,我们的研究未显示ICR组和CCR组在复合MACE结局上存在差异。