INRAE, Université Clermont Auvergne Vetagro Sup, UMRH, 63122 St-Genès-Champanelle, France.
MoISA, Université Montpellier, IRD, CIRAD, CIHEAM-IAMM, INRAE, Institut Agro, Montpellier, France.
Animal. 2022 Feb;16 Suppl 1:100376. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100376. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
This article critically reviews the current state of knowledge on the quality of animal-source foods according to animal production and food processing conditions, including consumer expectations-behaviours and the effects of consumption of animal-source foods on human health. Quality has been defined through seven core attributes: safety, commercial, sensory, nutritional, technological, convenience, and image. Image covers ethical, cultural and environmental dimensions associated with the origin of the food and the way it is produced and processed. This framework enabled to highlight the priorities given to the different quality attributes. It also helped to identify potential antagonisms and synergies among quality attributes, between production and processing stages, and among stakeholders. Primacy is essentially given to commercial quality attributes, especially for standard commodity animal-source foods. This primacy has strongly influenced genetic selection and farming practices in all livestock commodity chains and enabled substantial quantitative gains, although at the expense of other quality traits. Focal issues are the destructuration of chicken muscle that compromises sensory, nutritional and image quality attributes, and the fate of males in the egg and dairy sectors, which have heavily specialised their animals. Quality can be gained but can also be lost throughout the farm-to-fork continuum. Our review highlights critical factors and periods throughout animal production and food processing routes, such as on-farm practices, notably animal feeding, preslaughter and slaughter phases, food processing techniques, and food formulation. It also reveals on-farm and processing factors that create antagonisms among quality attributes, such as the castration of male pigs, the substitution of marine-source feed by plant-based feed in fish, and the use of sodium nitrite in meat processing. These antagonisms require scientific data to identify trade-offs among quality attributes and/or solutions to help overcome these tensions. However, there are also food products that value synergies between quality attributes and between production and processing phases, particularly Geographical Indications, such as for cheese and dry-cured ham. Human epidemiological studies have found associations between consumption of animal-source foods and increased or decreased risk for chronic non-communicable diseases. These associations have informed public health recommendations. However, they have not yet considered animal production and food processing conditions. A concerted and collaborative effort is needed from scientists working in animal science, food process engineering, consumer science, human nutrition and epidemiology in order to address this research gap. Avenues for research and main options for policy action are discussed.
本文批判性地回顾了根据动物生产和食品加工条件(包括消费者期望-行为)以及动物源食品消费对人类健康的影响,对动物源食品质量的现有认识。质量已通过七个核心属性来定义:安全性、商业性、感官性、营养性、技术性、便利性和形象性。形象涵盖了与食品来源及其生产和加工方式相关的伦理、文化和环境方面。该框架使我们能够突出对不同质量属性的重视程度。它还有助于确定生产和加工阶段之间以及利益相关者之间质量属性之间的潜在对抗和协同作用。商业质量属性占据主导地位,特别是对于标准商品动物源食品而言。这种主导地位强烈影响了所有家畜商品链中的遗传选择和养殖实践,实现了大量的数量增长,尽管是以牺牲其他质量特征为代价的。关键问题是鸡肉肌肉的结构破坏,这影响了感官、营养和形象质量属性,以及蛋品和奶制品部门雄性动物的命运,这些部门使它们的动物高度专业化。质量可以在农场到餐桌的整个过程中获得,也可以失去。我们的综述强调了动物生产和食品加工过程中的关键因素和关键时期,例如农场实践,特别是动物饲养、宰前和屠宰阶段、食品加工技术和食品配方。它还揭示了在农场和加工过程中产生质量属性对抗的因素,例如公猪去势、鱼类中用植物性饲料替代海洋源饲料,以及在肉类加工中使用亚硝酸钠。这些对抗需要科学数据来确定质量属性之间的权衡,或者找到解决这些问题的方法。然而,也有一些食品产品重视质量属性之间以及生产和加工阶段之间的协同作用,特别是地理标志产品,例如奶酪和干式火腿。人类流行病学研究发现,动物源食品的消费与慢性非传染性疾病风险的增加或降低之间存在关联。这些关联为公共卫生建议提供了信息。然而,它们尚未考虑动物生产和食品加工条件。需要从事动物科学、食品加工工程、消费者科学、人类营养和流行病学工作的科学家们共同努力,以解决这一研究空白。本文讨论了研究的途径和政策行动的主要选择。