Suppr超能文献

综述:欧洲有机动物产品的质量和认证。

Review: Quality and authentication of organic animal products in Europe.

机构信息

Université d'Auvergne, INRAE, Vetagro Sup, UMR Herbivores, 63122 St-Genès-Champanelle, France.

PEGASE, INRAE, Institut Agro, 35590 St-Gilles, France.

出版信息

Animal. 2022 Feb;16 Suppl 1:100405. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100405. Epub 2021 Nov 27.

Abstract

The 'organic' label guarantees a production process that avoids the use of synthetic fertilisers, pesticides and hormones and minimises the use of veterinary drugs; however, consumers are demanding guarantees regarding food quality. This article reviews the current state of knowledge on the quality of organic animal products, including the authentication of their organic origin. Quality has been considered as an integrative combination of six core attributes: commercial value, and nutritional, sensory, technological, convenience and safety attributes. The comparison of these attributes between organic and conventional animal products shows high heterogeneity due to variability in farming pratices in both organic and conventional systems. To overcome this, we pinpoint the farming practices underlying the differences observed. This enables light to be shed on the consequences of possible trajectories of organic farming, if specifications are relaxed or tightened up on commitments concerning farming practices that impact product quality. Two recent meta-analyses showed better nutritional attributes in organic milk and meat linked to their higher poly-unsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) content, particularly n-3 PUFAs. Regarding safety, we point to a lack of integrated studies quantifying the balance between positive and negative effects. Organic farming reduces the risk of drug residues and antibiotic resistance, but both outdoor rearing and a frequently longer rearing period increase the animals' exposition to environmental contaminants and the risk of their bioaccumulation in milk, eggs, meat and fish flesh. We highlight antagonisms between quality attributes for certain animal products (lamb, pork). In general, attributes are more variable for organic products, which can be explained by lower genetic selection (poultry), lower inputs and/or greater variability in farming conditions. However, the literature does not address the implications of this greater variability for the consumers' acceptability and the necessary adaptation of manufacturing processes. Further research is needed to document the impacts on human nutritional biomarkers and health. Methods used to authenticate organic origin are based on differences in animal diet composition between organic and conventional systems, but their reliability is hampered by the variability in farming practices.

摘要

“有机”标签保证了生产过程中避免使用合成肥料、农药和激素,并尽量减少兽药的使用;然而,消费者要求保证食品质量。本文综述了有机动物产品质量的现有知识状况,包括其有机来源的认证。质量被认为是六个核心属性的综合组合:商业价值以及营养、感官、技术、方便和安全属性。有机和常规动物产品这些属性的比较由于有机和常规系统中养殖实践的可变性而显示出高度的异质性。为了解决这个问题,我们指出了导致观察到的差异的养殖实践。这使得我们能够了解如果放宽或收紧对影响产品质量的养殖实践的承诺,有机农业的可能轨迹的后果。最近的两项荟萃分析表明,有机牛奶和肉类的营养属性更好,与其更高的多不饱和脂肪酸(PUFA)含量有关,特别是 n-3 PUFAs。关于安全性,我们指出缺乏量化积极和消极影响之间平衡的综合研究。有机农业降低了药物残留和抗生素耐药性的风险,但户外饲养和经常更长的饲养期增加了动物暴露于环境污染物的风险及其在牛奶、鸡蛋、肉类和鱼肉中的生物蓄积。我们强调了某些动物产品(羊肉、猪肉)的质量属性之间的对立。一般来说,有机产品的属性更为多变,这可以解释为遗传选择较低(家禽)、投入较低和/或养殖条件的变异性更大。然而,文献并没有涉及这种更大的可变性对消费者可接受性和制造过程的必要适应性的影响。需要进一步研究来记录对人类营养生物标志物和健康的影响。用于认证有机起源的方法基于有机和常规系统中动物饮食组成的差异,但由于养殖实践的可变性,其可靠性受到阻碍。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验