Czajka Karolina, Mehes-Smith Melanie, Nkongolo Kabwe
Biomolecular Sciences Program, Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON, P3E 2C6, Canada.
Department of Biology, Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON, P3E 2C6, Canada.
Genes Genomics. 2022 Mar;44(3):279-297. doi: 10.1007/s13258-021-01191-z. Epub 2021 Nov 27.
A review of research shows that methylation in plants is more complex and sophisticated than in microorganisms and animals. Overall, studies on the effects of abiotic stress on epigenetic modifications in plants are still scarce and limited to few species. Epigenetic regulation of plant responses to environmental stresses has not been elucidated. This study summarizes key effects of abiotic stressors on DNA methylation and histone modifications in plants.
Plant DNA methylation and histone modifications in responses to abiotic stressors varied and depended on the type and level of stress, plant tissues, age, and species. A critical analysis of the literature available revealed that 44% of the epigenetic modifications induced by abiotic stressors in plants involved DNA hypomethylation, 40% DNA hypermethylation, and 16% histone modification. The epigenetic changes in plants might be underestimated since most authors used methods such as methylation-sensitive amplification polymorphism (MSAP), High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and immunolabeling that are less sensitive compared to bisulfite sequencing and single-base resolution methylome analyses. More over, mechanisms underlying epigenetic changes in plants have not yet been determined since most reports showed only the level or/and distribution of DNA methylation and histone modifications.
Various epigenetic mechanisms are involved in response to abiotic stressors, and several of them are still unknown. Integrated analysis of the changes in the genome by omic approaches should help to identify novel components underlying mechanisms involved in DNA methylation and histone modifications associated with plant response to environmental stressors.
一项研究综述表明,植物中的甲基化比微生物和动物中的更为复杂和精细。总体而言,关于非生物胁迫对植物表观遗传修饰影响的研究仍然很少,并且仅限于少数物种。植物对环境胁迫反应的表观遗传调控尚未阐明。本研究总结了非生物胁迫因素对植物DNA甲基化和组蛋白修饰的关键影响。
植物对非生物胁迫因素的DNA甲基化和组蛋白修饰各不相同,并取决于胁迫的类型和程度、植物组织、年龄和物种。对现有文献的批判性分析表明,植物中非生物胁迫因素诱导的表观遗传修饰中,44%涉及DNA低甲基化,40%涉及DNA高甲基化,16%涉及组蛋白修饰。植物中的表观遗传变化可能被低估了,因为大多数作者使用的方法,如甲基化敏感扩增多态性(MSAP)、高效液相色谱(HPLC)和免疫标记,与亚硫酸氢盐测序和单碱基分辨率甲基化组分析相比,敏感性较低。此外,植物表观遗传变化的潜在机制尚未确定,因为大多数报告仅显示了DNA甲基化和组蛋白修饰的水平或/和分布。
各种表观遗传机制参与了对非生物胁迫因素的反应,其中一些机制仍然未知。通过组学方法对基因组变化进行综合分析,应有助于识别与植物对环境胁迫因素反应相关的DNA甲基化和组蛋白修饰所涉及机制的新成分。