Luo Jia, Yao Wenqin, Zhang Tianhao, Ge Honghan, Zhang Dongfeng
Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Public Health College, Qingdao, University, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China.
Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Public Health College, Qingdao, University, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China.
J Psychosom Res. 2021 Nov 16;152:110678. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110678.
Current evidence on the relationship between decreased handgrip strength and depression risk is controversial, and there is limited study focus on the potential bidirectional associations between them. We aim to explore their bidirectional relationships.
This study used panel data from the Health and Retirement Study involving 17,713 aging Americans (≥50 years old) who participated in at least 2 waves. Smedley spring-type hand-held dynamometer was used to assess the handgrip strength. Depression was evaluated by the 8-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression (CESD) scale. Time-lagged general estimating equations (GEE) were used to assess the bidirectional association between handgrip strength and the depression risk.
In the fully adjusted model, every 5 kg decreased handgrip strength was associated with a 6% (95%CI: 3%-9%) increased risk of depression. Compared with non-weakness participants, those with weakness had a higher depression risk (OR = 1.22, 95%CI: 1.09-1.36). Conversely, depression might associate with a 0.33 kg (95% CI: 0.09-0.56) decrease in handgrip strength and increased the risk of weakness by 18% (95% CI: 6%-33%). In addition, the results remained stable in the stratified analyses by gender and sex. Interestingly, the above-mentioned associations were also observed in overweight and obese participants.
The present study found bidirectional associations between handgrip strength and depression risk. Our results indicated early interventions for depression and handgrip strength might achieve reciprocal benefits over time.
目前关于握力下降与抑郁风险之间关系的证据存在争议,且针对二者潜在双向关联的研究有限。我们旨在探究它们的双向关系。
本研究使用了健康与退休研究的面板数据,该数据涉及17713名年龄≥50岁的美国老年人,他们至少参与了两轮调查。使用斯梅德利弹簧式手持测力计评估握力。通过8项流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CESD)评估抑郁情况。采用时间滞后广义估计方程(GEE)评估握力与抑郁风险之间的双向关联。
在完全调整模型中,握力每下降5千克,抑郁风险增加6%(95%置信区间:3%-9%)。与非虚弱参与者相比,虚弱参与者的抑郁风险更高(比值比=1.22,95%置信区间:1.09-1.36)。相反,抑郁可能与握力下降0.33千克(95%置信区间:0.09-0.56)相关,并使虚弱风险增加18%(95%置信区间:6%-33%)。此外,在按性别分层分析中结果保持稳定。有趣的是,在超重和肥胖参与者中也观察到了上述关联。
本研究发现握力与抑郁风险之间存在双向关联。我们的结果表明,对抑郁和握力进行早期干预可能会随着时间推移实现相互受益。