From the Division of Palliative Medicine, Departments of Critical Care Medicine, Oncology, and Anesthesiology (A.L.R.), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Royal College of Surgeons of Ireland (RCSI) SIM Centre for Simulation Education and Research (W.E.), RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland; and Departments of Community Health Sciences (J.L.), Emergency Medicine (R.D.W., V.G., A.C.), and Pediatrics (V.G.), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Simul Healthc. 2022 Oct 1;17(5):283-292. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000619. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
Use of frameworks for simulation debriefing represents best practice, although available frameworks provide only general guidance. Debriefers may experience difficulties implementing broad recommendations, especially in challenging debriefing situations that require more specific strategies. This study describes how debriefers approach challenges in postsimulation debriefing.
Ten experienced simulation educators participated in 3 simulated debriefings. Think-aloud interviews before and after the simulations were used to explore roles that debriefers adopted and the associated strategies they used to achieve specific goals. All data were audio recorded and transcribed, and a constructivist grounded theory approach was used for analysis.
4 roles in debriefing were identified: guiding, (inter)mediating, facilitating integration, and teaching. Each role was associated with specific goals and strategies that were adopted to achieve these goals. The goal of creating and maintaining a psychologically safe learning environment was common across all roles. These findings were conceptualized as the GIFT debriefing framework.
Our findings highlight the multiple roles debriefers play and how these roles are enacted in postsimulation debriefing. These results may inform future professional development and mentorship programs for debriefing in both simulation-based education and healthcare settings.
使用模拟讲评框架代表最佳实践,尽管现有的框架仅提供一般性指导。讲评者在实施广泛建议时可能会遇到困难,特别是在需要更具体策略的具有挑战性的讲评情境中。本研究描述了讲评者在模拟讲评后如何应对挑战。
10 名经验丰富的模拟教育者参与了 3 次模拟讲评。在模拟前后使用出声思维访谈来探讨讲评者所采用的角色以及他们用于实现特定目标的相关策略。所有数据均进行了录音和转录,并采用建构主义扎根理论方法进行分析。
确定了 4 种讲评角色:引导者、(中介者)、促进整合者和教学者。每个角色都与特定的目标相关联,并且采用了特定的策略来实现这些目标。创建和维持心理安全学习环境的目标在所有角色中都是共同的。这些发现被概念化为 GIFT 讲评框架。
我们的研究结果强调了讲评者所扮演的多个角色以及这些角色在模拟讲评后是如何实施的。这些结果可能为模拟教育和医疗保健环境中的讲评的未来专业发展和指导计划提供信息。