• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于评估团队汇报沟通与互动模式的语音识别技术:面向医疗模拟教育工作者的算法工具包。

Speech recognition technology for assessing team debriefing communication and interaction patterns: An algorithmic toolkit for healthcare simulation educators.

作者信息

Brutschi Robin, Wang Rui, Kolbe Michaela, Weiss Kerrin, Lohmeyer Quentin, Meboldt Mirko

机构信息

D-MAVT, ETH Zurich, Leonhardstrasse, Zurich, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland.

Simulation Center USZ, Universitätsspital Zürich, Huttenstrasse 46, Zurich, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Adv Simul (Lond). 2024 Oct 9;9(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s41077-024-00315-1.

DOI:10.1186/s41077-024-00315-1
PMID:39385298
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11465542/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Debriefings are central to effective learning in simulation-based medical education. However, educators often face challenges when conducting debriefings, which are further compounded by the lack of empirically derived knowledge on optimal debriefing processes. The goal of this study was to explore the technical feasibility of audio-based speaker diarization for automatically, objectively, and reliably measuring debriefing interaction patterns among debriefers and participants. Additionally, it aimed to investigate the ability to automatically create statistical analyses and visualizations, such as sociograms, solely from the audio recordings of debriefings among debriefers and participants.

METHODS

We used a microphone to record the audio of debriefings conducted during simulation-based team training with third-year medical students. The debriefings were led by two healthcare simulation instructors. We processed the recorded audio file using speaker diarization machine learning algorithms and validated the results manually to showcase its accuracy. We selected two debriefings to compare the speaker diarization results between different sessions, aiming to demonstrate similarities and differences in interaction patterns.

RESULTS

Ten debriefings were analyzed, each lasting about 30 min. After data processing, the recorded data enabled speaker diarization, which in turn facilitated the automatic creation of visualized interaction patterns, such as sociograms. The findings and data visualizations demonstrated the technical feasibility of implementing audio-based visualizations of interaction patterns, with an average accuracy of 97.78%.We further analyzed two different debriefing cases to uncover similarities and differences between the sessions. By quantifying the response rate from participants, we were able to determine and quantify the level of interaction patterns triggered by instructors in each debriefing session. In one session, the debriefers triggered 28% of the feedback from students, while in the other session, this percentage increased to 36%.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that speaker diarization technology can be applied accurately and automatically to provide visualizations of debriefing interactions. This application can be beneficial for the development of simulation educator faculty. These visualizations can support instructors in facilitating and assessing debriefing sessions, ultimately enhancing learning outcomes in simulation-based healthcare education.

摘要

背景

总结汇报是基于模拟的医学教育中有效学习的核心。然而,教育工作者在进行总结汇报时常常面临挑战,而关于最佳总结汇报流程的实证性知识的缺乏又进一步加剧了这些挑战。本研究的目的是探索基于音频的说话人识别技术在自动、客观且可靠地测量总结汇报者与参与者之间的互动模式方面的技术可行性。此外,其旨在研究仅从总结汇报者与参与者之间的总结汇报音频记录自动创建统计分析和可视化图表(如社会关系图)的能力。

方法

我们使用麦克风记录了在与三年级医学生进行的基于模拟的团队培训期间进行的总结汇报的音频。总结汇报由两名医疗模拟教员主持。我们使用说话人识别机器学习算法处理录制的音频文件,并手动验证结果以展示其准确性。我们选择了两次总结汇报来比较不同场次之间的说话人识别结果,旨在展示互动模式的异同。

结果

分析了10次总结汇报,每次持续约30分钟。经过数据处理,录制的数据实现了说话人识别,进而有助于自动创建可视化的互动模式,如社会关系图。研究结果和数据可视化展示了实现基于音频的互动模式可视化的技术可行性,平均准确率为97.78%。我们进一步分析了两个不同的总结汇报案例,以发现场次之间的异同。通过量化参与者的回应率,我们能够确定并量化每次总结汇报中教员引发的互动模式水平。在一场次中,总结汇报者引发了学生28%的反馈,而在另一场次中,这一比例增至36%。

结论

我们的结果表明,说话人识别技术可以准确且自动地应用于提供总结汇报互动的可视化。这种应用对模拟教育师资的发展可能有益。这些可视化可以支持教员促进和评估总结汇报环节,最终提高基于模拟的医疗保健教育中的学习成果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f79/11465542/83344ed0b978/41077_2024_315_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f79/11465542/280cb325e9e8/41077_2024_315_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f79/11465542/dd299370fb2e/41077_2024_315_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f79/11465542/7720a4ff3dd5/41077_2024_315_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f79/11465542/210d648b7688/41077_2024_315_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f79/11465542/83344ed0b978/41077_2024_315_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f79/11465542/280cb325e9e8/41077_2024_315_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f79/11465542/dd299370fb2e/41077_2024_315_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f79/11465542/7720a4ff3dd5/41077_2024_315_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f79/11465542/210d648b7688/41077_2024_315_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f79/11465542/83344ed0b978/41077_2024_315_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Speech recognition technology for assessing team debriefing communication and interaction patterns: An algorithmic toolkit for healthcare simulation educators.用于评估团队汇报沟通与互动模式的语音识别技术:面向医疗模拟教育工作者的算法工具包。
Adv Simul (Lond). 2024 Oct 9;9(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s41077-024-00315-1.
2
Helping healthcare teams to debrief effectively: associations of debriefers' actions and participants' reflections during team debriefings.帮助医疗团队进行有效的反思:团队反思过程中反思者的行为与参与者的思考之间的关联。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2023 Mar;32(3):160-172. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014393. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
3
Guiding, Intermediating, Facilitating, and Teaching (GIFT): A Conceptual Framework for Simulation Educator Roles in Healthcare Debriefing.指导、中介、促进和教学(GIFT):医疗保健反思中模拟教育者角色的概念框架。
Simul Healthc. 2022 Oct 1;17(5):283-292. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000619. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
4
Debriefing interaction patterns and learning outcomes in simulation: an observational mixed-methods network study.模拟中的汇报互动模式与学习成果:一项观察性混合方法网络研究
Adv Simul (Lond). 2022 Sep 6;7(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s41077-022-00222-3.
5
Immediate faculty feedback using debriefing timing data and conversational diagrams.使用汇报时间数据和对话图进行即时教师反馈。
Adv Simul (Lond). 2022 Mar 7;7(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s41077-022-00203-6.
6
DE-CODE: a coding scheme for assessing debriefing interactions.DE-CODE:一种用于评估汇报互动的编码方案。
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2018 Mar 23;4(2):51-58. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2017-000233. eCollection 2018.
7
Quality with quantity? Evaluating interprofessional faculty prebriefs and debriefs for simulation training using video.质量与数量?使用视频评估模拟培训中的跨专业教员预讲和讲评。
Surgery. 2019 Jun;165(6):1069-1074. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.01.014. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
8
DebriefLive: A Pilot Study of a Virtual Faculty Development Tool for Debriefing.简报直播:一个用于简报反思的虚拟师资发展工具的试点研究。
Simul Healthc. 2020 Oct;15(5):363-369. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000436.
9
Debriefing the Interprofessional Team in Medical Simulation医学模拟中的跨专业团队汇报
10
Quality of interdisciplinary postsimulation debriefing: 360° evaluation.跨学科模拟后汇报的质量:360°评估
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2017 Jan 1;3(1):9-16. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2016-000125. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
Debriefing Methods for Simulation in Healthcare: A Systematic Review.医疗保健模拟中的汇报方法:系统评价。
Simul Healthc. 2024 Jan 1;19(1S):S112-S121. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000765.
2
"Asking for help is a strength"-how to promote undergraduate medical students' teamwork through simulation training and interprofessional faculty.“寻求帮助是一种力量”——如何通过模拟训练和跨专业教师促进本科医学生的团队合作。
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 28;14:1214091. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1214091. eCollection 2023.
3
Transforming Professional Identity in Simulation Debriefing: A Systematic Metaethnographic Synthesis of the Simulation Literature.
模拟讲评中专业身份的转变:模拟文献的系统元分析综合
Simul Healthc. 2024 Apr 1;19(2):90-104. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000734. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
4
Measuring teamwork for training in healthcare using eye tracking and pose estimation.利用眼动追踪和姿势估计来衡量医疗保健培训中的团队协作。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 31;14:1169940. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1169940. eCollection 2023.
5
Measuring the impact of simulation debriefing on the practices of interprofessional trauma teams using natural language processing.使用自然语言处理测量模拟讲评对跨专业创伤团队实践的影响。
Am J Surg. 2023 Feb;225(2):394-399. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.09.018. Epub 2022 Oct 1.
6
Debriefing interaction patterns and learning outcomes in simulation: an observational mixed-methods network study.模拟中的汇报互动模式与学习成果:一项观察性混合方法网络研究
Adv Simul (Lond). 2022 Sep 6;7(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s41077-022-00222-3.
7
Helping healthcare teams to debrief effectively: associations of debriefers' actions and participants' reflections during team debriefings.帮助医疗团队进行有效的反思:团队反思过程中反思者的行为与参与者的思考之间的关联。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2023 Mar;32(3):160-172. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014393. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
8
Managing psychological safety in debriefings: a dynamic balancing act.在汇报情况时管理心理安全感:一项动态的平衡行为。
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2020 Apr 20;6(3):164-171. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2019-000470. eCollection 2020.
9
DE-CODE: a coding scheme for assessing debriefing interactions.DE-CODE:一种用于评估汇报互动的编码方案。
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2018 Mar 23;4(2):51-58. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2017-000233. eCollection 2018.
10
Immediate faculty feedback using debriefing timing data and conversational diagrams.使用汇报时间数据和对话图进行即时教师反馈。
Adv Simul (Lond). 2022 Mar 7;7(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s41077-022-00203-6.