• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

编码集体知识,指导数据复用者:数字科学数据集的协作固化

Encoding Collective Knowledge, Instructing Data Reusers: The Collaborative Fixation of a Digital Scientific Data Set.

作者信息

Hoeppe Götz

机构信息

Departments of Anthropology and Sociology & Legal Studies, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1 Canada.

出版信息

Comput Support Coop Work. 2021;30(4):463-505. doi: 10.1007/s10606-021-09407-2. Epub 2021 Oct 25.

DOI:10.1007/s10606-021-09407-2
PMID:34840429
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8608782/
Abstract

This article provides a novel perspective on the use and reuse of scientific data by providing a chronological ethnographic account and analysis of how a team of researchers prepared an astronomical catalogue (a table of measured properties of galaxies) for public release. Whereas much existing work on data reuse has focused on information about data (such as metadata), whose form or lack has been described as a hurdle for reusing data successfully, I describe how data makers tried to instruct users through the processed data themselves. The fixation of this catalogue was a negotiation, resulting in what was acceptable to team members and coherent with the diverse data uses pertinent to their completed work. It was through preparing their catalogue as an 'instructing data object' that this team seeked to encode its members' knowledge of how the data were processed and to make it consequential for users by devising methodical ways to structure anticipated uses. These methods included introducing redundancies that would help users to self-correct mistaken uses, selectively deleting data, and deflecting accountability through making notational choices. They dwell on an understanding of knowledge not as exclusively propositional (such as the belief in propositions), but as embedded in witnessable activities and the products of these activities. I discuss the implications of this account for philosophical notions of collective knowledge and for theorizing coordinative artifacts in CSCW. Eventually, I identify a tension between 'using algorithms' and 'doing science' in preparing data sets and show how it was resolved in this case.

摘要

本文通过按时间顺序对一组研究人员如何准备一份天文星表(星系测量属性表)以供公开发布进行民族志描述和分析,为科学数据的使用和再利用提供了一个全新视角。尽管现有的许多关于数据再利用的工作都集中在数据相关信息(如元数据)上,其形式或缺失被描述为成功再利用数据的障碍,但我描述了数据制作者如何试图通过处理后的数据本身来指导用户。这份星表的确定是一个协商过程,结果是团队成员可接受的,并且与他们已完成工作相关的各种数据用途相一致。正是通过将他们的星表准备成一个“指导性数据对象”,这个团队试图对其成员关于数据如何处理的知识进行编码,并通过设计系统的方法来构建预期用途,使其对用户产生影响。这些方法包括引入冗余信息以帮助用户自我纠正错误用途、有选择地删除数据,以及通过符号选择转移责任。他们强调对知识的理解并非仅仅是命题性的(比如对命题的信念),而是嵌入在可见证的活动以及这些活动的产物之中。我讨论了这一描述对于集体知识的哲学概念以及对计算机支持的协同工作(CSCW)中协调工件进行理论化的意义。最终,我指出在准备数据集时“使用算法”和“做科学”之间的一种张力,并展示了在这种情况下它是如何得到解决的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/986a/8608782/178302abea80/10606_2021_9407_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/986a/8608782/b8e78a0b5935/10606_2021_9407_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/986a/8608782/178302abea80/10606_2021_9407_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/986a/8608782/b8e78a0b5935/10606_2021_9407_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/986a/8608782/178302abea80/10606_2021_9407_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Encoding Collective Knowledge, Instructing Data Reusers: The Collaborative Fixation of a Digital Scientific Data Set.编码集体知识,指导数据复用者:数字科学数据集的协作固化
Comput Support Coop Work. 2021;30(4):463-505. doi: 10.1007/s10606-021-09407-2. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
2
Biomedical Data Sharing and Reuse: Attitudes and Practices of Clinical and Scientific Research Staff.生物医学数据共享与再利用:临床与科研人员的态度及实践
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 24;10(6):e0129506. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129506. eCollection 2015.
3
Working data together: the accountability and reflexivity of digital astronomical practice.共同工作数据:数字天文学实践的责任和反思性。
Soc Stud Sci. 2014 Apr;44(2):243-70. doi: 10.1177/0306312713509705.
4
Rules to be adopted for publishing a scientific paper.发表科学论文应采用的规则。
Ann Ital Chir. 2016;87:1-3.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
EMIF Catalogue: A collaborative platform for sharing and reusing biomedical data.EMIF 目录:一个用于共享和重用生物医学数据的协作平台。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Jun;126:35-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
7
Attitudes and uses of archival materials among science-based anthropologists.以科学为基础的人类学家对档案材料的态度与使用情况。
Arch Sci (Dordr). 2023 Feb 9:1-25. doi: 10.1007/s10502-023-09411-z.
8
Implementing the 2009 Institute of Medicine recommendations on resident physician work hours, supervision, and safety.实施 2009 年美国医学研究所关于住院医师工作时间、监督和安全的建议。
Nat Sci Sleep. 2011 Jun 24;3:47-85. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S19649. Print 2011.
9
[The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].[医生工作分析:宣告体外受精尝试的终结]
Encephale. 2003 Jul-Aug;29(4 Pt 1):293-305.
10
"The Road We Travel": Developing a co-produced narrative for a photovoice project.《我们走过的路》:为摄影展项目制作合作叙事。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Aug;28(4):632-643. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12709. Epub 2020 Nov 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Metadata accounts: Achieving data and evidence in scientific research.元数据管理:实现科学研究中的数据与证据。
Soc Stud Sci. 2019 Oct;49(5):732-757. doi: 10.1177/0306312719863494. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
2
Algorithmic accountability.算法问责制。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2018 Sep 13;376(2128). doi: 10.1098/rsta.2017.0362.
3
Attitudes and norms affecting scientists' data reuse.影响科学家数据复用的态度和规范。
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 27;12(12):e0189288. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189288. eCollection 2017.
4
The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship.科学数据管理和保存的 FAIR 指导原则。
Sci Data. 2016 Mar 15;3:160018. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18.
5
Changes in Data Sharing and Data Reuse Practices and Perceptions among Scientists Worldwide.全球科学家在数据共享、数据重用实践及认知方面的变化。
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 26;10(8):e0134826. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134826. eCollection 2015.
6
Researcher perspectives on publication and peer review of data.研究人员对数据发表和同行评审的看法。
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 23;10(2):e0117619. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117619. eCollection 2015.
7
How do astronomers share data? Reliability and persistence of datasets linked in AAS publications and a qualitative study of data practices among US astronomers.天文学家如何共享数据?美国天文学会出版物中数据集的可靠性和持久性以及对美国天文学家数据实践的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 28;9(8):e104798. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104798. eCollection 2014.
8
Working data together: the accountability and reflexivity of digital astronomical practice.共同工作数据:数字天文学实践的责任和反思性。
Soc Stud Sci. 2014 Apr;44(2):243-70. doi: 10.1177/0306312713509705.
9
Science friction: data, metadata, and collaboration.科学摩擦:数据、元数据和协作。
Soc Stud Sci. 2011 Oct;41(5):667-90. doi: 10.1177/0306312711413314.
10
Data sharing by scientists: practices and perceptions.科学家的数据共享:实践与看法。
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e21101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021101. Epub 2011 Jun 29.