Corduff Niamh, Chen Jeng Feng, Chen Ya Hui, Choi Ho Sung, Goldie Kate, Lam Yui, Lesthari Nyoman Indra, Lim Ting Song, Luo Suzanna, Quiambao Arnelle, Siew Tuck Wah, Tseng Fang Wen, Chao Yates Y Y
Dr. Corduff is with the Cosmetic Refinement Clinic in Geelong, Australia.
Dr. J. F. Chen is with Tri-Service General Hospital in Taipei, Taiwan.
J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2021 Aug;14(8):E76-E85. Epub 2021 Aug 1.
Several usage guidelines for calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA), a dermal filler material, exist for non-Asian patients, making it necessary to determine whether their findings and consensuses are applicable to Asian patients who have distinct anatomies, cultural preferences, and aesthetic requests.
We sought to develop a Pan-Asian consensus on CaHA use in skin biostimulation, contouring, and combination treatments for face and body indications.
A survey on CaHA usage for contouring and biostimulation indications in Asian patients was conducted, followed by discussions to establish consensus statements and topics for examination.
Several aspects of facial shaping and contouring or skin biostimulation with CaHA were agreed on, including that dilution is not a key consideration, that microfocused ultrasound with visualisation precedes CaHA in same day or session treatments, and that cannulas should be used. Among the many agreements on interventions in specific facial and body areas, there were also disagreements due to the diverse Asian patient presentations, requests, and access to tools or products; for example, CaHA should be placed in the interfascial layer for temple contouring, CaHA should not be injected directly into the infraorbital area for safety, and diluted CaHA should be injected subdermally for nonfacial or whole-face biostimulation and contouring.
Our disagreements highlight the diversity of Asian facial morphotypes and desired aesthetic outcomes and underscore the need for customized aesthetic strategies to accommodate the heterogeneity of Asian anatomies, cultural preferences, and aesthetic ideals. Establishing consensus statements on critical aspects of Asian patient considerations, efficacy and safety, is crucial. This document provides strategic guidance on the use of classic, diluted CaHA for biostimulation or undiluted Radiesse(+) (Merz Pharma GmbH & Co. KGaA, Frankfurt, Germany) for lifting and contouring to ensure consistent CaHA delivery for successful patient outcomes.
对于非亚洲患者,存在几种关于真皮填充材料羟基磷灰石钙(CaHA)的使用指南,因此有必要确定这些研究结果和共识是否适用于具有不同解剖结构、文化偏好和美学需求的亚洲患者。
我们试图就CaHA在面部和身体适应症的皮肤生物刺激、轮廓塑造及联合治疗中的应用达成泛亚共识。
针对亚洲患者中CaHA用于轮廓塑造和生物刺激适应症进行了一项调查,随后进行讨论以确定共识声明和审查主题。
就使用CaHA进行面部塑形、轮廓塑造或皮肤生物刺激的几个方面达成了共识,包括稀释不是关键考虑因素、在同一天或同一疗程治疗中,可视化微聚焦超声先于CaHA使用,以及应使用套管针。在针对特定面部和身体区域干预措施的众多共识中,由于亚洲患者表现、需求以及工具或产品获取情况的多样性,也存在分歧;例如,进行颞部轮廓塑造时,CaHA应置于筋膜间层;出于安全考虑,CaHA不应直接注射到眶下区域;对于非面部或全脸生物刺激及轮廓塑造,稀释后的CaHA应皮下注射。
我们的分歧凸显了亚洲面部形态类型和期望美学效果的多样性,并强调需要定制美学策略以适应亚洲人解剖结构、文化偏好和美学理想的异质性。就亚洲患者考虑因素、疗效和安全性的关键方面达成共识声明至关重要。本文档为使用经典的、稀释的CaHA进行生物刺激或未稀释的瑞蓝唯瑅(德国默克雪兰诺公司)进行提升和轮廓塑造提供了战略指导,以确保一致地输送CaHA从而实现成功治疗效果。