• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

发展干预措施对肯尼亚图尔卡纳县牧民生计的影响。

Effects of development interventions on pastoral livelihoods in Turkana County, Kenya.

作者信息

Akall Gregory

机构信息

Africa Office, United Nations Environment Programme, UN Avenue, New Office Block 2, Level 1, P.O. Box 30552-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.

出版信息

Pastoralism. 2021;11(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13570-021-00197-2. Epub 2021 Nov 24.

DOI:10.1186/s13570-021-00197-2
PMID:34840712
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8610612/
Abstract

Turkana County has a long history of drought and development interventions and remains one of the poorest counties in Kenya. In Turkana, livelihoods are increasingly under threat because of climate change, conflict, and the changing land use and management. There are complex interactions between the multiple drivers of change in landscapes and livelihoods in the region. The question addressed here is: How have external development interventions contributed to the changing pastoralist livelihoods in Turkana? This study is specific to the lower part of the Turkwel River basin, particularly the Nanyee irrigated area in Turkwel, Loima sub-County of Turkana County. This article examines the external development interventions during the colonial, post-independence, and contemporary periods to reveal the ways that land use practices and livelihoods have changed across these periods. Land use practices are changing due to the growing human population, droughts, urbanization, and dispossession of grazing areas through state and donor-supported interventions. It is suggested in this article that the change from a system of customary, unrestricted grazing to one of enclosed pastures has threatened pastoral territories, as well as cultures and livelihoods over the past six decades. The new set of development interventions introduced by international and national actors have failed to support local livelihoods, instead joining the list of existing problems that undermine pastoralism, including drought, livestock diseases, and cattle rustling.

摘要

图尔卡纳县长期遭受干旱,且经历了诸多发展干预措施,如今仍是肯尼亚最贫困的县之一。在图尔卡纳,由于气候变化、冲突以及土地利用和管理方式的转变,人们的生计正日益受到威胁。该地区景观和生计变化的多种驱动因素之间存在复杂的相互作用。这里要探讨的问题是:外部发展干预措施如何影响了图尔卡纳游牧民不断变化的生计?本研究聚焦于图尔韦尔河流域下游地区,特别是图尔卡纳县洛伊马分区图尔韦尔的纳耶灌溉区。本文审视了殖民时期、独立后时期和当代的外部发展干预措施,以揭示这些时期土地利用方式和生计的变化情况。由于人口增长、干旱、城市化以及通过国家和捐助方支持的干预措施导致牧区被剥夺,土地利用方式正在发生变化。本文认为,在过去六十年里,从传统的无限制放牧系统转变为围栏牧场系统,这对游牧领地以及文化和生计构成了威胁。国际和国家行为体引入的一系列新的发展干预措施未能支持当地生计,反而成为破坏游牧业的现有问题之一,这些问题还包括干旱、牲畜疾病和偷牛。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90ae/8610612/1989ecea9e43/13570_2021_197_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90ae/8610612/5f1136f68032/13570_2021_197_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90ae/8610612/9483a11cc0d5/13570_2021_197_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90ae/8610612/b22125856eee/13570_2021_197_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90ae/8610612/1989ecea9e43/13570_2021_197_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90ae/8610612/5f1136f68032/13570_2021_197_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90ae/8610612/9483a11cc0d5/13570_2021_197_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90ae/8610612/b22125856eee/13570_2021_197_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90ae/8610612/1989ecea9e43/13570_2021_197_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of development interventions on pastoral livelihoods in Turkana County, Kenya.发展干预措施对肯尼亚图尔卡纳县牧民生计的影响。
Pastoralism. 2021;11(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13570-021-00197-2. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
2
East Africa's pastoralist emergency: is climate change the straw that breaks the camel's back?东非牧民紧急情况:气候变化是否成为压垮骆驼的最后一根稻草?
Third World Q. 2010;31(8):1321-338. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2010.541085.
3
Trade-offs for climate-resilient pastoral livelihoods in wildlife conservancies in the Mara ecosystem, Kenya.肯尼亚马拉生态系统野生动物保护区中气候适应型畜牧生计的权衡取舍。
Pastoralism. 2017;7(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13570-017-0085-1. Epub 2017 May 23.
4
The futures of pastoralism in the Horn of Africa: pathways of growth and change.东非之角畜牧业的未来:增长与变化之路径
Rev Sci Tech. 2016 Nov;35(2):389-403. doi: 10.20506/rst.35.2.2524.
5
Community engagement in pastoralist areas: Lessons from the public dialogue process for a new refugee settlement in Turkana, Kenya.牧民地区的社区参与:肯尼亚图尔卡纳新难民营公共对话进程的经验教训。
Pastoralism. 2021;11(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13570-021-00192-7. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
6
Challenges of pastoral cattle production in a sub-humid zone of Nigeria.尼日利亚半湿润地区牧区养牛业面临的挑战。
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2015 Aug;47(6):1177-85. doi: 10.1007/s11250-015-0845-0. Epub 2015 May 17.
7
Using participatory epidemiological techniques to estimate the relative incidence and impact on livelihoods of livestock diseases amongst nomadic pastoralists in Turkana South District, Kenya.运用参与式流行病学技术,估算肯尼亚图尔卡纳南区游牧牧民中牲畜疾病的相对发病率及其对生计的影响。
Prev Vet Med. 2009 Aug 1;90(3-4):194-203. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.05.001. Epub 2009 May 31.
8
Dynamics of Land Management and Implications on Pastoral Livelihoods in Northern Tanzania.坦桑尼亚北部土地管理动态及其对牧民生计的影响
Environ Manage. 2023 Jan;71(1):29-39. doi: 10.1007/s00267-021-01568-6. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
9
The changing nature of conflict and famine vulnerability: the case of livestock raiding in Turkana District, Kenya.冲突与饥荒脆弱性的变化本质:以肯尼亚图尔卡纳地区的牲畜劫掠为例。
Disasters. 1998 Sep;22(3):185-99. doi: 10.1111/1467-7717.00086.
10
The role of food aid in drought and recovery: Oxfam's North Turkana (Kenya) drought relief programme, 1992-94.粮食援助在干旱及恢复过程中的作用:乐施会1992 - 1994年肯尼亚北图尔卡纳干旱救援项目
Disasters. 1995 Sep;19(3):247-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.1995.tb00343.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Urbanization exacerbates age-associated declines in cardiometabolic health in Turkana and Orang Asli.城市化加剧了图尔卡纳人和原住民中与年龄相关的心脏代谢健康衰退。
medRxiv. 2025 Jun 7:2025.06.06.25329160. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.06.25329160.
2
Assessing veterinary professionals' perspectives on community knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding dog rabies in Turkana, Kenya.评估肯尼亚图尔卡纳地区兽医专业人员对社区关于犬类狂犬病的知识、态度和做法的看法。
Front Vet Sci. 2025 Mar 13;12:1526551. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1526551. eCollection 2025.
3
The built environment is more predictive of cardiometabolic health than other aspects of lifestyle in two rapidly transitioning Indigenous populations.

本文引用的文献

1
Adaptation as a political process: adjusting to drought and conflict in Kenya's drylands.作为政治进程的适应:肯尼亚干旱地区应对干旱与冲突
Environ Manage. 2009 May;43(5):817-35. doi: 10.1007/s00267-008-9189-0. Epub 2008 Aug 23.
2
Differential mortality in Turkana agriculturalists and pastoralists.图尔卡纳族农业人口和牧民的死亡率差异
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1986 Aug;70(4):525-36. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330700411.
在两个快速变迁的原住民群体中,与生活方式的其他方面相比,建筑环境对心脏代谢健康的预测性更强。
medRxiv. 2024 Aug 26:2024.08.26.24312234. doi: 10.1101/2024.08.26.24312234.
4
Indigenous communities' perceptions reveal threats and management options of wild edible plants in semiarid lands of northwestern Kenya.土著社区的认知揭示了肯尼亚西北部半干旱地区野生食用植物所面临的威胁和管理选择。
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2023 May 4;19(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13002-023-00584-6.