Nair Shalini, Chen Xinguang
Department of Epidemiology, University of Florida, 2004 Mowry Road, Gainesville, Florida, 32610, USA.
Glob Health J. 2022 Mar;6(1):38-43. doi: 10.1016/j.glohj.2021.11.005. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
Both population-level epidemiological data and individual-level biological data are needed to control the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Population-level data are widely available and efforts to combat COVID-19 have generated proliferate data on the biology and immunoresponse to the causative pathogen, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). However, there remains a paucity of systemized data on this subject.
In this review, we attempt to extract systemized data on the biology and immuno-response to SARS-CoV-2 from the most up-to-date peer-reviewed studies. We will focus on the biology of the virus and immunological variations that are key for determining long-term immunity, transmission potential, and prognosis.
Peer-reviewed articles were sourced from the PubMed database and by snowballing search of selected publications. Search terms included: "Novel Coronavirus" OR "COVID-19" OR "SARS-CoV-2" OR "2019-nCoV" AND "Immunity" OR "Immune Response" OR "Antibody Response" OR "Immunologic Response". Studies published from December 31, 2019 to December 31, 2020 were included. To ensure validity, papers in pre-print were excluded.
Of 2 889 identified papers, 36 were included. Evidence from these studies suggests early seroconversion in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. Antibody titers appear to markedly increase two weeks after infection, followed by a plateau. A more robust immune response is seen in patients with severe COVID-19 as opposed to mild or asymptomatic presentations. This trend persists with regard to the length of antibody maintenance. However, overall immunity appears to wane within two to three months post-infection.
Findings of this study indicate that immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 follow the general pattern of viral infection. Immunity generated through natural infection appears to be short, suggesting a need for long-term efforts to control the pandemic. Antibody testing will be essential to gauge the epidemic and inform decision-making on effective strategies for treatment and prevention. Further research is needed to illustrate immunoglobulin-specific roles and neutralizing antibody activity.
控制2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行既需要人群层面的流行病学数据,也需要个体层面的生物学数据。人群层面的数据广泛可得,抗击COVID-19的努力已产生了大量关于致病病原体严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的生物学和免疫反应的数据。然而,关于这一主题的系统化数据仍然匮乏。
在本综述中,我们试图从最新的同行评议研究中提取关于SARS-CoV-2的生物学和免疫反应的系统化数据。我们将关注病毒的生物学特性以及对于确定长期免疫力、传播潜力和预后至关重要的免疫变异。
同行评议文章来源于PubMed数据库,并通过对选定出版物的滚雪球式搜索获取。搜索词包括:“新型冠状病毒”或“COVID-19”或“SARS-CoV-2”或“2019-nCoV”以及“免疫”或“免疫反应”或“抗体反应”或“免疫应答”。纳入2019年12月31日至2020年12月31日发表的研究。为确保有效性,排除预印本论文。
在2889篇已识别的论文中,纳入了36篇。这些研究的证据表明,感染SARS-CoV-2的患者会出现早期血清转化。抗体滴度在感染后两周似乎会显著升高,随后趋于平稳。与轻症或无症状表现的患者相比,重症COVID-19患者的免疫反应更强。在抗体维持时间方面,这一趋势依然存在。然而,总体免疫力在感染后两到三个月内似乎会减弱。
本研究结果表明,对SARS-CoV-2的免疫反应遵循病毒感染的一般模式。通过自然感染产生的免疫力似乎较短,这表明需要长期努力来控制大流行。抗体检测对于评估疫情以及为治疗和预防的有效策略提供决策依据至关重要。需要进一步研究以阐明免疫球蛋白的具体作用和中和抗体活性。