Suppr超能文献

立体光刻手术导板化学-物理灭菌后线性尺寸精度。

Linear dimensional accuracy of stereolithographic surgical guide after chemistry and physics sterilization.

机构信息

Private Practitioner, DDS, MS. University Centre of Araraquara, UNIARA, Araraquara, SP, Brazil.

DDS, MS, PhD, Doctor Assistant Professor, School of Dentistry, University of Ribeirão Preto, UNAERP, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Oct;123(5):510-513. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2021.11.006. Epub 2021 Nov 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dimensional stability of prototyped surgical guides after autoclave and 2% glutaraldehyde sterilization processes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty prototyped surgical guides were prepared and submitted to two sterilization processes (n = 10): Physics - sterilization by autoclave (saturated water vapor under pressure, temperature of 126 to 130 °C, pressure of 1,7 at 1.9 kgf/cm, 16 min); Chemistry - sterilization by 2% glutaraldehyde for 10 h. Six pre-established points were measured in the prototyped surgical guides, before and after sterilization, using a digital caliper rule. The comparisons were made using orthogonal contrasts using the linear model of mixed effects (random and fixed).

RESULTS

there are no significant differences between autoclave and glutaraldehyde 2% (p>0.05) there are significant differences after autoclave sterilization (p<0.05) and there are not significant differences after 2% glutaraldehyde sterilization (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

autoclave promoted dimensional alteration of the prototyped surgical guides, and the chemical sterilization by glutaraldehyde 2% did not cause dimensional alteration of the prototype surgical guides, being a favorable choice for sterilization.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

the sterilization of surgical guides can be performed through the chemical process with 2% glutaraldehyde without changing the linear precision of the prototype surgical guides.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估原型手术导板在高压蒸汽灭菌和 2%戊二醛消毒过程后的尺寸稳定性。

材料与方法

制备 20 个原型手术导板并进行两种消毒处理(n=10):物理法-高压蒸汽灭菌(饱和水蒸气,压力 1.7 千克力/平方厘米,温度 126-130°C,16 分钟);化学法-2%戊二醛消毒 10 小时。使用数字卡尺在原型手术导板消毒前后测量 6 个预先设定的点。使用混合效应(随机和固定)线性模型进行正交对比比较。

结果

高压蒸汽和 2%戊二醛之间没有显著差异(p>0.05);高压蒸汽灭菌后有显著差异(p<0.05);2%戊二醛灭菌后无显著差异(p>0.05)。

结论

高压蒸汽导致原型手术导板的尺寸发生改变,而 2%戊二醛的化学消毒未导致原型手术导板的尺寸发生改变,是一种有利的消毒选择。

临床意义

手术导板的消毒可以通过 2%戊二醛的化学处理进行,而不会改变原型手术导板的线性精度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验