• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孟加拉国低成本小学洗手干预措施的试点:可接受性、可行性和可持续性潜力。

Pilot of a Low-Cost Elementary School Handwashing Intervention in Bangladesh: Acceptability, Feasibility, and Potential for Sustainability.

机构信息

International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021 Nov 29;106(1):239-249. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-1335.

DOI:10.4269/ajtmh.20-1335
PMID:34844216
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8733513/
Abstract

Schoolchildren frequently transmit respiratory and gastrointestinal infections because of dense person-to-person contact in schools. We piloted a low-cost handwashing intervention among elementary schoolchildren in Bangladesh. We trained teachers to lead behavior change communication sessions using flipcharts to encourage students' handwashing before eating, after defecating, and after cleaning school toilets; provided handwashing stations (reservoirs with taps and stool + basin + soapy water solution [mix of 30 gm detergent with 1.5 L water] + pump top bottle with steel holder); and formed hygiene committees for maintenance and covering the recurrent cost of detergent. We evaluated intervention acceptability, feasibility, and potential for sustainability at 1 and 14 months after the intervention. At baseline, of 300 before eating events, no one washed hands with soap, and 99.7% (299) did not wash hands at all as soap was unavailable. Out of 269 after toileting events, 0.7% (2) washed hands with soap, and 88% (237) did not wash hands. After 4 weeks of the intervention, 45% (87/195 before eating events), 83% (155/186 after toileting events), and 100% (15/15 after cleaning toilet events) washed both hands with soapy water as children found it accessible, low cost, and child friendly. After 14 months, 9.4% (55/586 before eating events) and 37% (172/465 after toileting events) washed both hands with soapy water for health benefits. The intervention was acceptable and feasible; it overcame limited access to soap and water and was affordable as schools covered the recurrent costs of detergent. Further research should explore long-term habit adoption and impact on health and attendance.

摘要

在校学生之间存在密切的人际接触,因此经常传播呼吸道和胃肠道感染。我们在孟加拉国的小学开展了一项低成本的洗手干预措施试点。我们培训教师使用翻页挂图进行行为改变沟通课程,鼓励学生在进食前、便后和清洁学校厕所后洗手;提供洗手站(带水龙头和马桶的蓄水池+盆+肥皂水溶液[每 1.5 升水混合 30 克清洁剂] +带钢支架的顶部泵瓶);并成立卫生委员会负责维护和承担清洁剂的经常性费用。我们在干预后 1 个月和 14 个月评估了干预措施的可接受性、可行性和可持续性潜力。在基线时,在 300 次进食前事件中,没有人用肥皂洗手,由于没有肥皂,99.7%(299 次)根本没有洗手。在 269 次便后事件中,只有 0.7%(2 次)用肥皂洗手,88%(237 次)没有洗手。在干预的第 4 周,45%(195 次进食前事件中的 87 次)、83%(186 次便后事件中的 155 次)和 100%(15 次清洁厕所事件中的 15 次)都用肥皂水洗了双手,因为孩子们发现这种方法容易获得、成本低且适合儿童。在 14 个月后,9.4%(55 次进食前事件中的 55 次)和 37%(172 次便后事件中的 172 次)为了健康益处而用肥皂水洗了双手。该干预措施是可以接受且可行的;它克服了肥皂和水供应有限的问题,并且由于学校承担了清洁剂的经常性费用,因此负担得起。还需要进一步研究以探索长期习惯的养成以及对健康和出勤率的影响。

相似文献

1
Pilot of a Low-Cost Elementary School Handwashing Intervention in Bangladesh: Acceptability, Feasibility, and Potential for Sustainability.孟加拉国低成本小学洗手干预措施的试点:可接受性、可行性和可持续性潜力。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021 Nov 29;106(1):239-249. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-1335.
2
Acceptability and Feasibility of Sharing a Soapy Water System for Handwashing in a Low-Income Urban Community in Dhaka, Bangladesh: A Qualitative Study.孟加拉国达卡的一个低收入城市社区共享肥皂水处理洗手系统的可接受性和可行性:一项定性研究。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018 Aug;99(2):502-512. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.17-0672. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
3
Effect of an equipment-behavior change intervention on handwashing behavior among primary school children in Kenya: the Povu Poa school pilot study.肯尼亚一项设备-行为改变干预对小学生洗手行为的影响:Povu Poa 学校试点研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 28;19(1):647. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6902-2.
4
Pilot of an Elementary School Cough Etiquette Intervention: Acceptability, Feasibility, and Potential for Sustainability.一项小学咳嗽礼仪干预措施的试点研究:可接受性、可行性及可持续性潜力
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017 Dec;97(6):1876-1885. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0914. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
5
The effect of handwashing at recommended times with water alone and with soap on child diarrhea in rural Bangladesh: an observational study.仅用水和用肥皂在推荐时间洗手对孟加拉国农村儿童腹泻的影响:一项观察性研究。
PLoS Med. 2011 Jun;8(6):e1001052. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001052. Epub 2011 Jun 28.
6
Designing a handwashing station for infrastructure-restricted communities in Bangladesh using the integrated behavioural model for water, sanitation and hygiene interventions (IBM-WASH).利用水、环境卫生与个人卫生干预综合行为模型(IBM-WASH)为孟加拉国基础设施受限社区设计一个洗手站。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Sep 23;13:877. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-877.
7
Effect of a water, sanitation and hygiene program on handwashing with soap among household members of diarrhoea patients in healthcare facilities in Bangladesh: a cluster-randomised controlled trial of the CHoBI7 mobile health program.孟加拉国医疗机构中腹泻患者家庭成员用肥皂洗手的水、环境卫生和个人卫生方案效果:CHoBI7 移动医疗方案的一项群组随机对照试验。
Trop Med Int Health. 2020 Aug;25(8):1008-1015. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13416. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
8
Provision versus promotion to develop a handwashing station: the effect on desired handwashing behavior.设置洗手设施与宣传推广以建立洗手站:对期望的洗手行为的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 5;17(1):390. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4316-6.
9
Factors perceived to facilitate or hinder handwashing among primary students: a qualitative assessment of the Mikono Safi intervention schools in NW Tanzania.坦桑尼亚西北部 Mikono Safi 干预学校小学生感知到的促进或阻碍洗手的因素:定性评估。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 28;9(11):e030947. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030947.
10
Can Social Motivators Improve Handwashing Behavior among Children? Evidence from a Cluster Randomized Trial of a School Hygiene Intervention in the Philippines.社会激励因素能否改善儿童的洗手行为?菲律宾学校卫生干预措施的一项整群随机试验的证据。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Nov 23;104(2):756-765. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0174.

本文引用的文献

1
Sustained adoption of water, sanitation and hygiene interventions: systematic review.持续采用水、环境卫生和个人卫生干预措施:系统评价。
Trop Med Int Health. 2018 Feb;23(2):122-135. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13011. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
2
Pilot of an Elementary School Cough Etiquette Intervention: Acceptability, Feasibility, and Potential for Sustainability.一项小学咳嗽礼仪干预措施的试点研究:可接受性、可行性及可持续性潜力
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017 Dec;97(6):1876-1885. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0914. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
3
Understanding Internal Accountability in Nigeria's Routine Immunization System: Perspectives From Government Officials at the National, State, and Local Levels.理解尼日利亚常规免疫体系中的内部问责制:来自国家、州和地方各级政府官员的观点。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Jul 1;6(7):403-412. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.150.
4
Effects of a social accountability approach, CARE's Community Score Card, on reproductive health-related outcomes in Malawi: A cluster-randomized controlled evaluation.社会问责制方法(美国援外社的社区计分卡)对马拉维生殖健康相关成果的影响:一项整群随机对照评估。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 10;12(2):e0171316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171316. eCollection 2017.
5
Drivers of sustained hygiene behaviour change: A case study from mid-western Nepal.持续卫生行为改变的驱动因素:来自尼泊尔中西部的一个案例研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Aug;163:28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.06.051. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
6
Theoretical explanations for maintenance of behaviour change: a systematic review of behaviour theories.行为改变维持的理论解释:行为理论的系统综述
Health Psychol Rev. 2016 Sep;10(3):277-96. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2016.1151372. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
7
Behavior Change without Behavior Change Communication: Nudging Handwashing among Primary School Students in Bangladesh.无需行为改变沟通的行为改变:推动孟加拉国小学生洗手
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Jan 14;13(1):129. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13010129.
8
Promoting Handwashing Behavior: The Effects of Large-scale Community and School-level Interventions.促进洗手行为:大规模社区和学校层面干预措施的效果
Health Econ. 2016 Dec;25(12):1545-1559. doi: 10.1002/hec.3273. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
9
Community-linked maternal death review (CLMDR) to measure and prevent maternal mortality: a pilot study in rural Malawi.社区关联孕产妇死亡评审(CLMDR)用于衡量和预防孕产妇死亡:马拉维农村地区的一项试点研究。
BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 20;5(4):e007753. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007753.
10
Microbiological evaluation of the efficacy of soapy water to clean hands: a randomized, non-inferiority field trial.皂水清洁手部效果的微生物学评价:一项随机、非劣效现场试验。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014 Aug;91(2):415-23. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.13-0475. Epub 2014 Jun 9.