Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, 718 S. Euclid Ave. Apt. 112, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jul;36(7):5104-5109. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08876-2. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
Up to 89% of physicians who routinely perform endoscopy experience some type of musculoskeletal pain. In this study, we sought to quantitatively analyze provider factors that influence ergonomic strain during live endoscopic procedures.
Surface electromyography (sEMG) was used to measure ergonomic strain on physicians while performing upper and lower endoscopies. EMG data were normalized to a maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) recording for each muscle group, yielding a %MVC value. Subgroup analyses were performed based on glove size, physician training level, specialty, and handedness.
A total of 165 upper (n = 68) and lower (n = 97) endoscopies were recorded. Endoscopists with small hand sizes had significantly higher ergonomic strain in the left anterior and posterior forearm muscle compartments as compared to endoscopists with medium or large hands (%MVC L-anterior: small: 9.1 ± 1.1; medium: 6.4 ± 1.2; large: 5.9 ± 1.6; p < 0.001); (%MVC L-posterior: small: 12.0 ± 0.8; medium: 9.4 ± 1.3; large: 8.8 ± 1.4; p < 0.001). Additionally, upper body muscle groups had significantly higher ergonomic strain in endoscopists with less lifetime endoscopic experience (%MVC R-trapezius: expert: 8.4 ± 1.2; novice: 9.3 ± 1.2; p < 0.05); (%MVC R-deltoid: expert: 6.1 ± 1.4; novice: 8.5 ± 1.3; p < 0.001). There were no significant ergonomic differences between surgeons or gastroenterologists and no differences between right- and left-handed dominant individuals.
Endoscopists with small hands experienced great ergonomic strain in their left forearm. Our data support the widely held belief that "one size does not fit all" and will hopefully spark change in the design of future endoscopes by device manufacturers. Our data also support that the experience level of the endoscopist contributed significantly to ergonomic performance, likely due to postural differences leading to decreased upper body strain. Therefore, it remains critically important to educate young proceduralists on strategies for ergonomic relief early in his or her endoscopic training program that can ameliorate ergonomic strain that accrues over the lifetime of a physician's career.
在经常进行内镜检查的医生中,有 89%的人会出现某种类型的肌肉骨骼疼痛。在这项研究中,我们试图定量分析在进行活体内镜检查过程中影响医生工作相关肌肉骨骼劳损的因素。
使用表面肌电图(sEMG)测量医生在进行上消化道和下消化道内镜检查时的工作相关肌肉骨骼劳损。EMG 数据被归一化为每个肌肉群的最大自主收缩(MVC)记录,得出%MVC 值。根据手套尺寸、医生培训水平、专业和惯用手进行亚组分析。
共记录了 165 例上消化道(n=68)和下消化道(n=97)内镜检查。与中号或大号手的内镜医生相比,手较小的内镜医生在前臂左侧和后侧的工作相关肌肉骨骼劳损明显更高(%MVC L-前侧:小号:9.1±1.1;中号:6.4±1.2;大号:5.9±1.6;p<0.001);(%MVC L-后侧:小号:12.0±0.8;中号:9.4±1.3;大号:8.8±1.4;p<0.001)。此外,在上消化道内镜检查中,具有较少内镜检查经验的医生的上半身肌肉群的工作相关肌肉骨骼劳损明显更高(%MVC R-斜方肌:专家:8.4±1.2;新手:9.3±1.2;p<0.05);(%MVC R-三角肌:专家:6.1±1.4;新手:8.5±1.3;p<0.001)。外科医生或胃肠病医生之间没有明显的工作相关肌肉骨骼差异,惯用右手或左手的人之间也没有差异。
手小的内镜医生左前臂的工作相关肌肉骨骼劳损较大。我们的数据支持这样一种广泛的观点,即“一种尺寸并不适合所有人”,并有望激发设备制造商对手未来内镜设计的改变。我们的数据还表明,内镜医生的经验水平对工作相关肌肉骨骼劳损的表现有显著影响,这可能是由于姿势的差异导致上半身劳损减少。因此,在年轻的内镜医生的内镜培训计划早期,教育他们关于缓解工作相关肌肉骨骼劳损的策略仍然至关重要,这些策略可以减轻医生职业生涯中积累的工作相关肌肉骨骼劳损。