Rowe P H, Starlinger M J, Kasdon E, Marrone G, Silen W
Gastroenterology. 1986 Mar;90(3):559-69. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(86)91109-1.
The effects of 20 mM aspirin (ASA), 20 mM sodium salicylate (SA), or 10(-4) M indomethacin placed in the nutrient solution (N) to stimulate systemic administration were investigated at pHN 7.3 in Ussing-chambered amphibian gastric mucosae. In histamine-stimulated tissues, the initial rise and subsequent rapid fall in potential difference, rise in resistance, and inhibition of hydrogen ion (H+) secretion induced by SAN did not occur with ASAN unless hydrolysis of ASAN produced a SAN of greater than 3 mM. In metiamide-treated tissues, 20 mM SAN caused an immediate fall in potential difference and an increase in resistance; 2 mM SAN and 20 mM ASA produced similar qualitative electrical changes, but only those induced by ASA were reversible. IndomethacinN caused no significant changes in potential difference, resistance, or H+ secretion in histamine- or metiamide-treated tissues. Despite producing highly significant reductions in generation of prostaglandin E2, and prostaglanndin F2 alpha and 6-keto prostaglandin F1 alpha, ASAN and indomethacin caused no surface ulceration. Sodium salicylate placed in the nutrient solution caused only a small reduction in prostaglandin F2 alpha, without change in the other prostaglandins, and produced extensive edema in the lamina propria, histologically. We conclude the following: (a) The inhibition of H+ secretion and electrical changes caused by SAN in histamine-treated gastric fundus are not observed with ASAN unless there is hydrolysis to [SAN] greater than 3 mM. (b) Our data strongly implicate the SAN in ASAN-containing solutions as being responsible for the electrical effects and inhibition of H+ secretion. (c) There is no correlation in vitro between inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis and the electrical or morphologic changes produced by nutrient exposure to ASA, SA, or indomethacin.
在乌斯琴氏槽两栖类动物胃黏膜中,于pH值为7.3的营养液(N)中加入20 mM阿司匹林(ASA)、20 mM水杨酸钠(SA)或10⁻⁴ M吲哚美辛以模拟全身给药,研究其效果。在组胺刺激的组织中,除非ASA水解产生的水杨酸盐(SAN)浓度大于3 mM,否则ASA不会引起由组胺引起的电位差初始上升及随后的快速下降、电阻增加以及氢离子(H⁺)分泌抑制。在甲硫米特处理的组织中,20 mM的SAN会导致电位差立即下降和电阻增加;2 mM的SAN和20 mM的ASA产生相似的定性电变化,但只有ASA引起的变化是可逆的。在组胺或甲硫米特处理的组织中,吲哚美辛不会引起电位差、电阻或H⁺分泌的显著变化。尽管ASA和吲哚美辛使前列腺素E2、前列腺素F2α和6-酮前列腺素F1α的生成大幅减少,但并未导致表面溃疡。置于营养液中的水杨酸钠仅使前列腺素F2α略有减少,其他前列腺素无变化,且在组织学上导致固有层广泛水肿。我们得出以下结论:(a)除非水解产生的[SAN]大于3 mM,否则在组胺处理的胃底中,ASA不会引起由组胺引起的H⁺分泌抑制和电变化。(b)我们的数据强烈表明,含ASA溶液中的SAN是电效应和H⁺分泌抑制的原因。(c)在体外,前列腺素合成的抑制与营养液中加入ASA、SA或吲哚美辛所产生的电或形态学变化之间没有相关性。