• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

仅针对极有可能发生的修饰的脆性指数。

Fragility indices for only sufficiently likely modifications.

机构信息

Department of Statistics and Data Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853;

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10021.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Dec 7;118(49). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2105254118.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.2105254118
PMID:34848537
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8670515/
Abstract

The fragility index is a clinically meaningful metric based on modifying patient outcomes that is increasingly used to interpret the robustness of clinical trial results. The fragility index relies on a concept that explores alternative realizations of the same clinical trial by modifying patient measurements. In this article, we propose to generalize the fragility index to a family of fragility indices called the incidence fragility indices that permit only outcome modifications that are sufficiently likely and provide an exact algorithm to calculate the incidence fragility indices. Additionally, we introduce a far-reaching generalization of the fragility index to any data type and explain how to permit only sufficiently likely modifications for nondichotomous outcomes. All of the proposed methodologies follow the fragility index concept.

摘要

脆弱指数是一种基于修正患者结局的有临床意义的指标,越来越多地被用于解释临床试验结果的稳健性。脆弱指数依赖于一个概念,即通过修改患者测量值来探索同一临床试验的替代实现。在本文中,我们提出将脆弱指数推广到一类称为发生率脆弱指数的脆弱指数家族,这些指数只允许进行足够可能的结局修正,并提供了一种精确的算法来计算发生率脆弱指数。此外,我们还将脆弱指数推广到任何数据类型,并解释了如何仅允许对非二分类结局进行足够可能的修正。所有提出的方法都遵循脆弱指数的概念。

相似文献

1
Fragility indices for only sufficiently likely modifications.仅针对极有可能发生的修饰的脆性指数。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Dec 7;118(49). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2105254118.
2
The fragility index can be used for sample size calculations in clinical trials.脆性指数可用于临床试验的样本量计算。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Nov;139:199-209. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.08.010. Epub 2021 Aug 15.
3
The Fragility Index in Hand Surgery Randomized Controlled Trials.手外科随机对照试验中的脆弱性指数
J Hand Surg Am. 2019 Aug;44(8):698.e1-698.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.10.005. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
4
The Fragility of Statistically Significant Results in Pediatric Orthopaedic Randomized Controlled Trials as Quantified by the Fragility Index: A Systematic Review.通过脆弱性指数量化的儿科骨科随机对照试验中具有统计学意义结果的脆弱性:一项系统评价
J Pediatr Orthop. 2018 Sep;38(8):e418-e423. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001201.
5
A method for calculating the fragility index of continuous outcomes.一种计算连续结局脆弱指数的方法。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Aug;136:20-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.023. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
6
The Fragility of Statistically Significant Randomized Controlled Trials in Plastic Surgery.整形外科中统计学显著的随机对照试验的脆弱性。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Nov;144(5):1238-1245. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006102.
7
On clinical trial fragility due to patients lost to follow up.由于患者失访导致的临床试验脆弱性。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Nov 20;21(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01446-z.
8
When the p Value Doesn't Cut It: The Fragility Index Applied to Randomized Controlled Trials in Colorectal Surgery.当 P 值不成立时:脆弱指数在结直肠外科随机对照试验中的应用。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2022 Feb 1;65(2):276-283. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002146.
9
Statistical Significance Versus Clinical Relevance: A Head-to-Head Comparison of the Fragility Index and Relative Risk Index.统计学显著性与临床相关性:脆弱性指数和相对风险指数的直接比较
Cureus. 2023 Oct 26;15(10):e47741. doi: 10.7759/cureus.47741. eCollection 2023 Oct.
10
The Robustness Index: Going Beyond Statistical Significance by Quantifying Fragility.稳健性指数:通过量化脆弱性超越统计显著性
Cureus. 2023 Aug 30;15(8):e44397. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44397. eCollection 2023 Aug.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Double-Zero-Event Studies in Evidence Synthesis: Evaluating Robustness Using the Fragility Index.双零事件研究在证据综合中的作用:使用脆弱性指数评估稳健性。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Feb;31(1):e14301. doi: 10.1111/jep.14301.
2
Beyond the Fragility Index.超越脆弱性指数。
Pharm Stat. 2025 Mar-Apr;24(2):e2452. doi: 10.1002/pst.2452. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
3
Robustness Assessment of Oncology Dose-Finding Trials Using the Modified Fragility Index.使用修正的脆弱性指数对肿瘤学剂量探索试验进行稳健性评估。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Oct 17;16(20):3504. doi: 10.3390/cancers16203504.
4
Assessing the fragility index of randomized controlled trials supporting perioperative care guidelines: A methodological survey protocol.评估支持围手术期护理指南的随机对照试验的脆弱指数:方法学调查方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 12;19(9):e0310092. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310092. eCollection 2024.
5
Is biomedical research self-correcting? Modelling insights on the persistence of spurious science.生物医学研究能自我纠错吗?关于虚假科学持续存在的建模见解。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Jan 31;11(1):231056. doi: 10.1098/rsos.231056. eCollection 2024 Jan.
6
Region of Attainable Redaction, an extension of Ellipse of Insignificance analysis for gauging impacts of data redaction in dichotomous outcome trials.可删减区域,椭圆不显著分析的扩展,用于评估二分类结局试验中数据删减的影响。
Elife. 2024 Jan 29;13:e93050. doi: 10.7554/eLife.93050.
7
Online haemodiafiltration and all-cause mortality: how fragile are the results of the studies published so far?在线血液透析滤过与全因死亡率:迄今为止发表的研究结果有多不可靠?
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2024 May 31;39(6):1034-1036. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfae003.
8
Assessing the robustness of COVID-19 vaccine efficacy trials: systematic review and meta-analysis, January 2023.评估 COVID-19 疫苗疗效试验的稳健性:系统评价和荟萃分析,2023 年 1 月。
Euro Surveill. 2023 Jun;28(22). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.22.2200706.
9
Empirical assessment of fragility index based on a large database of clinical studies in the Cochrane Library.基于 Cochrane 图书馆中大量临床研究数据库的脆性指数的实证评估。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2023 Mar;29(2):359-370. doi: 10.1111/jep.13787. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
10
The ellipse of insignificance, a refined fragility index for ascertaining robustness of results in dichotomous outcome trials.无显著性椭圆:一种确定二项结局试验结果稳健性的精细脆弱性指数。
Elife. 2022 Sep 20;11:e79573. doi: 10.7554/eLife.79573.

本文引用的文献

1
The fragility index can be used for sample size calculations in clinical trials.脆性指数可用于临床试验的样本量计算。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Nov;139:199-209. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.08.010. Epub 2021 Aug 15.
2
A method for calculating the fragility index of continuous outcomes.一种计算连续结局脆弱指数的方法。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Aug;136:20-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.023. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
3
Fragility index of trials supporting approval of anti-cancer drugs in common solid tumours.支持批准常见实体瘤抗癌药物的试验的脆弱指数。
Cancer Treat Rev. 2021 Mar;94:102167. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102167. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
4
Survival-Inferred Fragility Index of Phase 3 Clinical Trials Evaluating Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.评估免疫检查点抑制剂的 3 期临床试验的生存推断脆弱指数。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2017675. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.17675.
5
The Fragility Index and Trial Significance.脆弱性指数与试验意义。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Nov 1;180(11):1554. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.4787.
6
Fragility of clinical trials across research fields: A synthesis of methodological reviews.各研究领域临床试验的脆弱性:方法学综述的综合分析。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Oct;97:106151. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106151. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
7
The weakness of fragility index exposed in an analysis of the traumatic brain injury management guidelines: A meta-epidemiological and simulation study.脆弱指数的弱点在创伤性脑损伤管理指南分析中暴露无遗:一项荟萃流行病学和模拟研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 18;15(8):e0237879. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237879. eCollection 2020.
8
Dismantling the Fragility Index: A demonstration of statistical reasoning.拆解脆弱指数:统计推理的演示。
Stat Med. 2020 Nov 20;39(26):3720-3731. doi: 10.1002/sim.8689. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
9
Application of the Reverse Fragility Index to Statistically Nonsignificant Randomized Clinical Trial Results.反向脆弱指数在统计学上无显著意义的随机临床试验结果中的应用。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e2012469. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.12469.
10
When possible, report a Fisher-exact value and display its underlying null randomization distribution.当可能时,报告 Fisher 精确检验值并展示其潜在的零分布。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Aug 11;117(32):19151-19158. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1915454117. Epub 2020 Jul 23.