• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

由于患者失访导致的临床试验脆弱性。

On clinical trial fragility due to patients lost to follow up.

机构信息

Department of Statistics and Data Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, US.

Schulich Heart Centre, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Nov 20;21(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01446-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12874-021-01446-z
PMID:34800976
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8606097/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials routinely have patients lost to follow up. We propose a methodology to understand their possible effect on the results of statistical tests by altering the concept of the fragility index to treat the outcomes of observed patients as fixed but incorporate the potential outcomes of patients lost to follow up as random and subject to modification.

METHODS

We reanalyse the statistical results of three clinical trials on coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) to study the possible effect of patients lost to follow up on the treatment effect statistical significance. To do so, we introduce the LTFU-aware fragility indices as a measure of the robustness of a clinical trial's statistical results with respect to patients lost to follow up.

RESULTS

The analyses illustrate that clinical trials can either be completely robust to the outcomes of patients lost to follow up, extremely sensitive to the outcomes of patients lost to follow up, or in an intermediate state. When a clinical trial is in an intermediate state, the LTFU-aware fragility indices provide an interpretable measure to quantify the degree of fragility or robustness.

CONCLUSIONS

The LTFU-aware fragility indices allow researchers to rigorously explore the outcomes of patients who are lost to follow up, when their data is the appropriate kind. The LTFU-aware fragility indices are sensitivity measures in a way that the original fragility index is not.

摘要

背景

临床试验通常会有患者失访。我们提出了一种方法,通过改变脆弱指数的概念,将观察到的患者的结果视为固定,同时将失访患者的潜在结果视为随机,并可进行修改,从而了解其对统计检验结果的可能影响。

方法

我们重新分析了 3 项关于冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的临床试验的统计结果,以研究失访患者对治疗效果统计显著性的可能影响。为此,我们引入了 LTFU 意识脆弱指数,作为衡量临床试验统计结果对失访患者结果的稳健性的指标。

结果

分析表明,临床试验可以完全不受失访患者结果的影响,也可以非常敏感于失访患者的结果,或者处于中间状态。当临床试验处于中间状态时,LTFU 意识脆弱指数提供了一个可解释的衡量标准,以量化脆弱性或稳健性的程度。

结论

LTFU 意识脆弱指数允许研究人员在适当的情况下,严格地研究失访患者的结果。LTFU 意识脆弱指数是一种敏感性指标,而原始脆弱指数不是。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8690/8606097/ff3a187991d5/12874_2021_1446_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8690/8606097/ba109c307aba/12874_2021_1446_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8690/8606097/cc56758606f3/12874_2021_1446_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8690/8606097/ae5e4a2ad926/12874_2021_1446_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8690/8606097/ff3a187991d5/12874_2021_1446_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8690/8606097/ba109c307aba/12874_2021_1446_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8690/8606097/cc56758606f3/12874_2021_1446_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8690/8606097/ae5e4a2ad926/12874_2021_1446_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8690/8606097/ff3a187991d5/12874_2021_1446_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
On clinical trial fragility due to patients lost to follow up.由于患者失访导致的临床试验脆弱性。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Nov 20;21(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01446-z.
2
The fragility of statistically significant findings from randomized trials in spine surgery: a systematic survey.脊柱手术随机试验中具有统计学意义的研究结果的脆弱性:一项系统调查。
Spine J. 2015 Oct 1;15(10):2188-97. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.06.004. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
3
When the p Value Doesn't Cut It: The Fragility Index Applied to Randomized Controlled Trials in Colorectal Surgery.当 P 值不成立时:脆弱指数在结直肠外科随机对照试验中的应用。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2022 Feb 1;65(2):276-283. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002146.
4
Bias and Loss to Follow-Up in Cardiovascular Randomized Trials: A Systematic Review.心血管随机临床试验中的偏倚和随访丢失:系统评价。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Jul 21;9(14):e015361. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.015361. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
5
The Fragility Index in Hand Surgery Randomized Controlled Trials.手外科随机对照试验中的脆弱性指数
J Hand Surg Am. 2019 Aug;44(8):698.e1-698.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.10.005. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
6
The Fragility of Statistically Significant Results in Pediatric Orthopaedic Randomized Controlled Trials as Quantified by the Fragility Index: A Systematic Review.通过脆弱性指数量化的儿科骨科随机对照试验中具有统计学意义结果的脆弱性:一项系统评价
J Pediatr Orthop. 2018 Sep;38(8):e418-e423. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001201.
7
The statistical significance of randomized controlled trial results is frequently fragile: a case for a Fragility Index.随机对照试验结果的统计学显著性往往很脆弱:关于脆弱性指数的一个案例。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Jun;67(6):622-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.10.019. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
Fragility indices for only sufficiently likely modifications.仅针对极有可能发生的修饰的脆性指数。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Dec 7;118(49). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2105254118.
10
The Statistical Fragility of Management Options for Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures - A Systematic Review of Randomized Control Trial with Fragility Analysis.管理急性跟腱断裂的治疗方案的统计学脆弱性:基于脆弱性分析的随机对照试验的系统综述。
J ISAKOS. 2022 Aug;7(4):72-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jisako.2022.04.003. Epub 2022 Apr 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Fragility in cardiovascular randomized controlled trials with primary continuous outcomes (2018-2022) from multi-perspectives assessment: a cross-sectional survey.多视角评估2018 - 2022年主要连续性结局的心血管随机对照试验中的脆弱性:一项横断面调查
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2427909. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2427909. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
2
Beyond the Fragility Index.超越脆弱性指数。
Pharm Stat. 2025 Mar-Apr;24(2):e2452. doi: 10.1002/pst.2452. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
3
Robustness Assessment of Oncology Dose-Finding Trials Using the Modified Fragility Index.

本文引用的文献

1
Fragility indices for only sufficiently likely modifications.仅针对极有可能发生的修饰的脆性指数。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Dec 7;118(49). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2105254118.
2
The fragility index can be used for sample size calculations in clinical trials.脆性指数可用于临床试验的样本量计算。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Nov;139:199-209. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.08.010. Epub 2021 Aug 15.
3
Hypothetical case replacement can be used to quantify the robustness of trial results.假设病例替换可用于量化试验结果的稳健性。
使用修正的脆弱性指数对肿瘤学剂量探索试验进行稳健性评估。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Oct 17;16(20):3504. doi: 10.3390/cancers16203504.
4
Assessing robustness of results of randomised clinical trials using Fragility Index.使用脆弱性指数评估随机临床试验结果的稳健性。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2024 Oct;25(5):777-778. doi: 10.1007/s40368-024-00930-6. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
5
The Statistical Fragility of Marrow Stimulation for Cartilage Defects of the Knee: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.骨髓刺激治疗膝关节软骨缺损的统计学脆弱性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价。
Cartilage. 2024 Dec;15(4):389-398. doi: 10.1177/19476035241233441. Epub 2024 Feb 25.
6
Effects of closed loop ventilation on ventilator settings, patient outcomes and ICU staff workloads - a systematic review.闭环通气对呼吸机设置、患者结局和 ICU 工作人员工作量的影响——系统评价。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2024 Jun 1;41(6):438-446. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001972. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
7
Empirical assessment of fragility index based on a large database of clinical studies in the Cochrane Library.基于 Cochrane 图书馆中大量临床研究数据库的脆性指数的实证评估。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2023 Mar;29(2):359-370. doi: 10.1111/jep.13787. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
8
Assessing the robustness of results from clinical trials and meta-analyses with the fragility index.评估临床试验和荟萃分析结果的稳健性:脆弱指数方法。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Mar;228(3):276-282. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.08.053. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jun;134:150-159. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.01.025. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
4
Fragility of results from randomized controlled trials supporting the guidelines for the treatment of osteoporosis: a retrospective analysis.随机对照试验结果的脆弱性支持骨质疏松症治疗指南:回顾性分析。
Osteoporos Int. 2021 Sep;32(9):1713-1723. doi: 10.1007/s00198-021-05865-y. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
5
Fragility of clinical trials across research fields: A synthesis of methodological reviews.各研究领域临床试验的脆弱性:方法学综述的综合分析。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Oct;97:106151. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106151. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
6
Dismantling the Fragility Index: A demonstration of statistical reasoning.拆解脆弱指数:统计推理的演示。
Stat Med. 2020 Nov 20;39(26):3720-3731. doi: 10.1002/sim.8689. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
7
Application of the Reverse Fragility Index to Statistically Nonsignificant Randomized Clinical Trial Results.反向脆弱指数在统计学上无显著意义的随机临床试验结果中的应用。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e2012469. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.12469.
8
The fragility of trial results involves more than statistical significance alone.试验结果的脆弱性不仅仅涉及统计学意义。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Aug;124:34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.02.011. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
9
Systematic Evaluation of the Robustness of the Evidence Supporting Current Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization Using the Fragility Index.使用脆弱性指数对支持当前心肌血运重建指南的证据稳健性进行系统评价。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Dec;12(12):e006017. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006017. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
10
Five-Year Outcomes after PCI or CABG for Left Main Coronary Disease.左主干冠状动脉疾病经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术后 5 年的结果。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Nov 7;381(19):1820-1830. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1909406. Epub 2019 Sep 28.