• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用修正的脆弱性指数对肿瘤学剂量探索试验进行稳健性评估。

Robustness Assessment of Oncology Dose-Finding Trials Using the Modified Fragility Index.

作者信息

Shi Amy X, Zhou Heng, Nie Lei, Lin Lifeng, Li Hongjian, Chu Haitao

机构信息

Cardiovascular, Renal and Metabolism (CVRM), Biopharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Durham, NC 27703, USA.

Biostatistics and Research Decision Sciences, Merck & Co. Inc., Rahway, NJ 07065, USA.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2024 Oct 17;16(20):3504. doi: 10.3390/cancers16203504.

DOI:10.3390/cancers16203504
PMID:39456598
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11506443/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The sample sizes of phase I trials are typically small; some designs may lead to inaccurate estimation of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The objective of this study was to propose a metric assessing whether the MTD decision is sensitive to enrolling a few additional subjects in a phase I dose-finding trial.

METHODS

Numerous model-based and model-assisted designs have been proposed to improve the efficiency and accuracy of finding the MTD. The Fragility Index (FI) is a widely used metric quantifying the statistical robustness of randomized controlled trials by estimating the number of events needed to change a statistically significant result to non-significant (or vice versa). We propose a modified Fragility Index (mFI), defined as the minimum number of additional participants required to potentially change the estimated MTD, to supplement existing designs identifying fragile phase I trial results.

FINDINGS

Three oncology trials were used to illustrate how to evaluate the fragility of phase I trials using mFI. The results showed that two of the trials were not sensitive to additional subjects' participation while the third trial was quite fragile to one or two additional subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

The mFI can be a useful metric assessing the fragility of phase I trials and facilitating robust identification of MTD.

摘要

目的

I期试验的样本量通常较小;某些设计可能会导致对最大耐受剂量(MTD)的估计不准确。本研究的目的是提出一种指标,用于评估在I期剂量探索试验中纳入少数额外受试者时,MTD决策是否敏感。

方法

已经提出了许多基于模型和模型辅助的设计,以提高寻找MTD的效率和准确性。脆弱性指数(FI)是一种广泛使用的指标,通过估计将具有统计学意义的结果变为无统计学意义(或反之亦然)所需的事件数量,来量化随机对照试验的统计稳健性。我们提出了一种修正的脆弱性指数(mFI),定义为潜在改变估计的MTD所需的最少额外参与者数量,以补充现有的用于识别脆弱的I期试验结果的设计。

结果

三项肿瘤学试验被用于说明如何使用mFI评估I期试验的脆弱性。结果表明,其中两项试验对额外受试者的参与不敏感,而第三项试验对一两名额外受试者相当脆弱。

结论

mFI可以作为一种有用的指标,用于评估I期试验的脆弱性,并有助于稳健地识别MTD。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c605/11506443/d51f8a8aa664/cancers-16-03504-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c605/11506443/d51f8a8aa664/cancers-16-03504-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c605/11506443/d51f8a8aa664/cancers-16-03504-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Robustness Assessment of Oncology Dose-Finding Trials Using the Modified Fragility Index.使用修正的脆弱性指数对肿瘤学剂量探索试验进行稳健性评估。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Oct 17;16(20):3504. doi: 10.3390/cancers16203504.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Fragility of results from randomized controlled trials supporting the guidelines for the treatment of osteoporosis: a retrospective analysis.随机对照试验结果的脆弱性支持骨质疏松症治疗指南:回顾性分析。
Osteoporos Int. 2021 Sep;32(9):1713-1723. doi: 10.1007/s00198-021-05865-y. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
4
The 3 + 3 design in dose-finding studies with small sample sizes: Pitfalls and possible remedies.在样本量较小的剂量发现研究中使用 3+3 设计:陷阱及可能的补救措施。
Clin Trials. 2024 Jun;21(3):350-357. doi: 10.1177/17407745241240401. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
5
Systematic comparison of the statistical operating characteristics of various Phase I oncology designs.多种I期肿瘤学设计的统计操作特征的系统比较。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2016 Nov 24;5:34-48. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2016.11.006. eCollection 2017 Mar.
6
Fragility index of positive phase II and III randomised clinical trials of treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (2002-2022).肝细胞癌治疗的II期和III期阳性随机临床试验的脆弱性指数(2002 - 2022年)
JHEP Rep. 2023 Apr 7;5(7):100755. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100755. eCollection 2023 Jul.
7
Adaptive design for identifying maximum tolerated dose early to accelerate dose-finding trial.用于早期识别最大耐受剂量以加速剂量发现试验的适应性设计。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Apr 6;22(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01584-y.
8
Small-sample behavior of novel phase I cancer trial designs.新型 I 期癌症试验设计的小样本行为。
Clin Trials. 2013 Feb;10(1):63-80. doi: 10.1177/1740774512469311.
9
Assessing fragility of statistically significant findings from randomized controlled trials assessing pharmacological therapies for opioid use disorders: a systematic review.评估评估阿片类药物使用障碍药物治疗的随机对照试验中统计学显著发现的脆弱性:系统评价。
Trials. 2024 Apr 27;25(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08104-x.
10
The fragility of statistically significant findings from randomized trials in spine surgery: a systematic survey.脊柱手术随机试验中具有统计学意义的研究结果的脆弱性:一项系统调查。
Spine J. 2015 Oct 1;15(10):2188-97. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.06.004. Epub 2015 Jun 11.

本文引用的文献

1
The Robustness Index: Going Beyond Statistical Significance by Quantifying Fragility.稳健性指数:通过量化脆弱性超越统计显著性
Cureus. 2023 Aug 30;15(8):e44397. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44397. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
Assessing the robustness of results from clinical trials and meta-analyses with the fragility index.评估临床试验和荟萃分析结果的稳健性:脆弱指数方法。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Mar;228(3):276-282. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.08.053. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
3
Assessing and visualizing fragility of clinical results with binary outcomes in R using the fragility package.
使用 fragility 包在 R 中评估和可视化二项结果临床结果的脆弱性。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 1;17(6):e0268754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268754. eCollection 2022.
4
Cerclage placement in twin pregnancies with short or dilated cervix does not prevent preterm birth: a fragility index assessment.宫颈短或扩张的双胎妊娠中进行宫颈环扎术并不能预防早产:一项脆弱性指数评估。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Aug;227(2):338-339. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.025. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
5
Stopping rules for phase I clinical trials with dose expansion cohorts.具有剂量扩展队列的 I 期临床试验的停止规则。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2022 Feb;31(2):334-347. doi: 10.1177/09622802211064996. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
6
Fragility indices for only sufficiently likely modifications.仅针对极有可能发生的修饰的脆性指数。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Dec 7;118(49). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2105254118.
7
On clinical trial fragility due to patients lost to follow up.由于患者失访导致的临床试验脆弱性。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Nov 20;21(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01446-z.
8
A method for calculating the fragility index of continuous outcomes.一种计算连续结局脆弱指数的方法。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Aug;136:20-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.023. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
9
Survival-Inferred Fragility Index of Phase 3 Clinical Trials Evaluating Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.评估免疫检查点抑制剂的 3 期临床试验的生存推断脆弱指数。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2017675. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.17675.
10
Model-Assisted Designs for Early-Phase Clinical Trials: Simplicity Meets Superiority.早期临床试验的模型辅助设计:简单与卓越并存
JCO Precis Oncol. 2019 Oct 24;3. doi: 10.1200/PO.19.00032. eCollection 2019.