Suppr超能文献

通过网络分析揭示的微生物相互作用驱动的群落差异

Microbial interaction-driven community differences as revealed by network analysis.

作者信息

Pan Zhe, Chen Yanhong, Zhou Mi, McAllister Tim A, Guan Le Luo

机构信息

Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research Centre, Lethbridge, AB, Canada.

出版信息

Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2021 Nov 1;19:6000-6008. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.10.035. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Diversity and compositional analysis are the most common approaches in deciphering microbial community differences. However, these approaches neglect microbial structural differences driven by microbial interactions. In this study, the microbiota data were generated from 12 rectal digesta samples collected from steers in which the Shiga toxin 2 gene () was not expressed (defined as Stx2- group) in the bacteria, and those with expressed (defined as Stx2+ group) and used to explore whether microbial networks affect gut microbiota and foodborne pathogen virulence in cattle. Although the Shannon and Chao1 indices of rectal digesta microbial communities did not differ between the two groups (P > 0.05), 24 and 13 taxa were identified to be group-specific genera for Stx2- and Stx2+ microbial communities, respectively. The network analysis indicated 12 and 14 generalists (microbes that were densely connected with other taxa) in microbial communities for Stx2- and Stx2+ groups, and 8 out of 12 generalists and 6 out of 14 generalists were designated to Stx2- and Stx2+ group-specific genera, respectively. However, the 66 core genera were not classified as network generalists. Natural connectivity measurements revealed that the higher stability of the Stx2- microbial network in comparison to the Stx2+ network, suggesting that the structure of each microbial community was inherently different even when their diversity and composition were comparable. Group-specific genera intensely interacted with other taxa in the co-occurrence network, indicating that characterizing microbial networks together with group-specific genera could be an alternative approach to identify variation in microbial communities.

摘要

多样性和组成分析是解读微生物群落差异最常用的方法。然而,这些方法忽略了由微生物相互作用驱动的微生物结构差异。在本研究中,微生物群数据来自于从牛身上采集的12份直肠食糜样本,其中细菌中未表达志贺毒素2基因()的样本(定义为Stx2 -组)和表达该基因的样本(定义为Stx2 +组),并用于探究微生物网络是否影响牛的肠道微生物群和食源性病原体毒力。尽管两组直肠食糜微生物群落的香农指数和Chao1指数没有差异(P > 0.05),但分别鉴定出24个和13个分类单元为Stx2 -和Stx2 +微生物群落的组特异性属。网络分析表明,Stx2 -组和Stx2 +组微生物群落中分别有12个和14个多面手(与其他分类单元紧密相连的微生物),12个多面手中的8个和14个多面手中的6个分别被指定为Stx2 -和Stx2 +组特异性属。然而,66个核心属未被归类为网络多面手。自然连通性测量显示,与Stx2 +网络相比,Stx2 -微生物网络具有更高的稳定性,这表明即使每个微生物群落的多样性和组成相当,其结构本质上也是不同的。组特异性属在共现网络中与其他分类单元强烈相互作用,这表明将微生物网络与组特异性属一起表征可能是识别微生物群落变异的另一种方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验