• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Q 波是与原发性预防植入式心脏除颤器获益最相关的最强心电图变量:一项前瞻性多中心研究。

Q waves are the strongest electrocardiographic variable associated with primary prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator benefit: a prospective multicentre study.

机构信息

Research Unit of Internal Medicine, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, PO Box 5000, FIN-90014 Oulu, Finland.

Biocenter Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.

出版信息

Europace. 2022 May 3;24(5):774-783. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab260.

DOI:10.1093/europace/euab260
PMID:34849744
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9071070/
Abstract

AIM

The association of standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) markers with benefits of the primary prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) has not been determined in the contemporary era. We analysed traditional and novel ECG variables in a large prospective, controlled primary prophylactic ICD population to assess the predictive value of ECG in terms of ICD benefit.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Electrocardiograms from 1477 ICD patients and 700 control patients (EU-CERT-ICD; non-randomized, controlled, prospective multicentre study; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02064192), who met ICD implantation criteria but did not receive the device, were analysed. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. In ICD patients, the co-primary outcome of first appropriate shock was used. Mean follow-up time was 2.4 ± 1.1 years to death and 2.3 ± 1.2 years to the first appropriate shock. Pathological Q waves were associated with decreased mortality in ICD patients [hazard ratio (HR) 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35-0.84; P < 0.01] and patients with pathological Q waves had significantly more benefit from ICD (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.21-0.93; P = 0.03). QTc interval increase taken as a continuous variable was associated with both mortality and appropriate shock incidence, but commonly used cut-off values, were not statistically significantly associated with either of the outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Pathological Q waves were a strong ECG predictor of ICD benefit in primary prophylactic ICD patients. Excess mortality among Q wave patients seems to be due to arrhythmic death which can be prevented by ICD.

摘要

目的

在当代,标准 12 导联心电图(ECG)标志物与初级预防性植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)益处的关联尚未确定。我们分析了大型前瞻性、对照性初级预防性 ICD 人群中的传统和新型 ECG 变量,以评估 ECG 在 ICD 获益方面的预测价值。

方法和结果

对 1477 例 ICD 患者和 700 例对照患者(EU-CERT-ICD;非随机、对照、前瞻性多中心研究;ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02064192)的 ECG 进行了分析。这些患者符合 ICD 植入标准,但未植入该设备。主要终点是全因死亡率。在 ICD 患者中,使用了首次适当电击的联合主要终点。死亡的平均随访时间为 2.4±1.1 年,首次适当电击的平均随访时间为 2.3±1.2 年。病理性 Q 波与 ICD 患者死亡率降低相关[风险比(HR)0.54,95%置信区间(CI)0.35-0.84;P<0.01],且病理性 Q 波患者从 ICD 中获益更多(HR 0.44,95% CI 0.21-0.93;P=0.03)。将 QTc 间期增加视为连续变量与死亡率和适当电击发生率均相关,但常用的截断值与任何一种结果均无统计学显著相关性。

结论

病理性 Q 波是初级预防性 ICD 患者 ICD 获益的有力 ECG 预测指标。Q 波患者的超额死亡率似乎归因于心律失常性死亡,ICD 可预防这种死亡。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa95/9071070/5f903814a3a7/euab260f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa95/9071070/bad83963127c/euab260f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa95/9071070/5f903814a3a7/euab260f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa95/9071070/bad83963127c/euab260f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa95/9071070/5f903814a3a7/euab260f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Q waves are the strongest electrocardiographic variable associated with primary prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator benefit: a prospective multicentre study.Q 波是与原发性预防植入式心脏除颤器获益最相关的最强心电图变量:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
Europace. 2022 May 3;24(5):774-783. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab260.
2
Lack of Prognostic Value of T-Wave Alternans for Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Benefit in Primary Prevention.T 波电交替对植入式心脏复律除颤器一级预防获益无预后价值。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Jun 4;13(11):e032465. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032465. Epub 2024 May 28.
3
Rationale and design of the EU-CERT-ICD prospective study: comparative effectiveness of prophylactic ICD implantation.EU-CERT-ICD 前瞻性研究的原理和设计:预防性 ICD 植入的比较效果。
ESC Heart Fail. 2019 Feb;6(1):182-193. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12367. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
4
Present criteria for prophylactic ICD implantation: Insights from the EU-CERT-ICD (Comparative Effectiveness Research to Assess the Use of Primary ProphylacTic Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators in EUrope) project.目前预防性 ICD 植入的标准:来自 EU-CERT-ICD(评估在欧盟使用初级预防性植入式心脏除颤器的比较有效性研究)项目的见解。
J Electrocardiol. 2019 Nov-Dec;57S:S34-S39. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2019.09.001. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
5
Electrocardiographic Markers of Appropriate Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy in Young People with Congenital Heart Diseases.先天性心脏病青年患者合适的植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗的心电图标志物
Pediatr Cardiol. 2017 Dec;38(8):1663-1671. doi: 10.1007/s00246-017-1711-9. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
6
Outcomes in African Americans undergoing cardioverter-defibrillator implantation for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death: findings from the Prospective Observational Study of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators (PROSE-ICD).非裔美国人植入心脏复律除颤器以一级预防心源性猝死的结局:植入式心脏复律除颤器前瞻性观察研究(PROSE-ICD)的结果
Heart Rhythm. 2014 Aug;11(8):1377-83. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.04.039. Epub 2014 May 2.
7
Contemporary benefit-harm profile over two decades in primary prophylactic ICD-therapy.二十余年来,初级预防 ICD 治疗的当代获益-危害特征。
Clin Cardiol. 2019 Oct;42(10):866-872. doi: 10.1002/clc.23234. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
8
Clinical effectiveness of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: results of the EU-CERT-ICD controlled multicentre cohort study.一级预防植入式心脏复律除颤器的临床疗效:欧盟CERT-ICD对照多中心队列研究结果
Eur Heart J. 2020 Sep 21;41(36):3437-3447. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa226.
9
Microvolt T-wave alternans and other noninvasive predictors of serious arrhythmic events in patients with an implanted cardioverter-defibrillator.植入式心脏复律除颤器患者的微伏 T 波电交替和其他非侵入性严重心律失常事件预测因子。
Kardiol Pol. 2012;70(5):447-55.
10
Protein biomarkers identify patients unlikely to benefit from primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillators: findings from the Prospective Observational Study of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (PROSE-ICD).蛋白质生物标志物可识别出不太可能从一级预防植入式心脏复律除颤器中获益的患者:植入式心脏复律除颤器前瞻性观察研究(PROSE-ICD)的结果。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014 Dec;7(6):1084-91. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.001705. Epub 2014 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
The diagnostic value of electrocardiogram in the left variants of desmosomal arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy.心电图在桥粒性致心律失常性心肌病左心变异型中的诊断价值
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2025 Feb 19;27(Suppl 1):i83-i87. doi: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suae110. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Optimizing patient selection for primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: utilizing multimodal machine learning to assess risk of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator non-benefit.优化植入式心律转复除颤器一级预防的患者选择:利用多模态机器学习评估植入式心律转复除颤器无益风险。
Europace. 2023 Aug 2;25(9). doi: 10.1093/europace/euad271.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical effectiveness of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: results of the EU-CERT-ICD controlled multicentre cohort study.一级预防植入式心脏复律除颤器的临床疗效:欧盟CERT-ICD对照多中心队列研究结果
Eur Heart J. 2020 Sep 21;41(36):3437-3447. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa226.
2
Electrocardiogram as a predictor of survival without appropriate shocks in primary prophylactic ICD patients: A retrospective multi-center study.心电图作为一级预防性植入式心律转复除颤器患者无不适当电击生存的预测指标:一项回顾性多中心研究。
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Jun 15;309:78-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.03.024. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
3
The value of the 12-lead electrocardiogram in the prediction of sudden cardiac death.
12导联心电图在预测心源性猝死中的价值。
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2023 Apr 26;25(Suppl C):C218-C226. doi: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suad023. eCollection 2023 May.
4
ECG and Biomarker Profile in Patients with Acute Heart Failure: A Pilot Study.急性心力衰竭患者的心电图和生物标志物特征:一项初步研究。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Dec 3;12(12):3037. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12123037.
Prediction of mortality benefit based on periodic repolarisation dynamics in patients undergoing prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator: a prospective, controlled, multicentre cohort study.
基于周期性复极动力学预测接受预防性植入除颤器患者的死亡率获益:前瞻性、对照、多中心队列研究。
Lancet. 2019 Oct 12;394(10206):1344-1351. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31996-8. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
4
QT Prolongation and Malignant Arrhythmia: How Serious a Problem?QT间期延长与恶性心律失常:问题有多严重?
Eur Cardiol. 2017 Dec;12(2):112-120. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2017:16:1.
5
Differential multivariable risk prediction of appropriate shock versus competing mortality - A prospective cohort study to estimate benefits from ICD therapy.合适的电击与竞争死亡率的差异化多变量风险预测 - 一项前瞻性队列研究,以评估 ICD 治疗的获益。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Dec 1;272:102-107. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.06.103. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
6
Experiences in digitizing and digitally measuring a paper-based ECG archive.纸质心电图档案数字化及数字化测量的经验。
J Electrocardiol. 2018 Jan-Feb;51(1):74-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2017.09.007. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
7
A Decade of Information on the Use of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices and Interventional Electrophysiological Procedures in the European Society of Cardiology Countries: 2017 Report from the European Heart Rhythm Association.欧洲心脏病学会国家中心使用心脏植入式电子设备和介入性电生理程序的十年信息:欧洲心律协会 2017 年报告。
Europace. 2017 Aug 1;19(suppl_2):ii1-ii90. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux258.
8
Declining Risk of Sudden Death in Heart Failure.心力衰竭患者猝死风险降低。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 6;377(1):41-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1609758.
9
Devices for management of sudden cardiac death: Successes, challenges and perspectives.心脏性猝死管理设备:成就、挑战与展望
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Jun 15;237:34-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.03.053. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
10
QRS Fragmentation Patterns Representing Myocardial Scar Need to Be Separated from Benign Normal Variants: Hypotheses and Proposal for Morphology based Classification.代表心肌瘢痕的QRS碎裂模式需要与良性正常变异相区分:基于形态学分类的假设与建议
Front Physiol. 2016 Dec 26;7:653. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00653. eCollection 2016.