无标准心血管危险因素的冠状动脉疾病

Coronary Artery Disease Without Standard Cardiovascular Risk Factors.

作者信息

Yamamoto Ko, Natsuaki Masahiro, Morimoto Takeshi, Shiomi Hiroki, Takeji Yasuaki, Yamaji Kyohei, Matsumura-Nakano Yukiko, Yoshikawa Yusuke, Yamamoto Erika, Fuki Masayuki, Kato Eri, Yamashita Yugo, Yaku Hidenori, Nakatsuma Kenji, Watanabe Hiroki, Matsuda Mitsuo, Tamura Toshihiro, Inoko Moriaki, Mabuchi Hiroshi, Shirotani Manabu, Eizawa Hiroshi, Ishii Katsuhisa, Inada Tsukasa, Onodera Tomoya, Shinoda Eiji, Yamamoto Takashi, Toyofuku Mamoru, Takahashi Mamoru, Sakamoto Hiroki, Miki Shinji, Aoyama Takeshi, Suwa Satoru, Sato Yukihito, Furukawa Yutaka, Ando Kenji, Kadota Kazushige, Nakagawa Yoshihisa, Kimura Takeshi

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2022 Feb 1;164:34-43. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.10.032. Epub 2021 Nov 28.

Abstract

Recently, one observational study showed that patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) without standard cardiovascular risk factors were associated with increased mortality compared with patients with risk factors. This unexpected result should be evaluated in other populations including those with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) and chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). Among 30,098 consecutive patients undergoing first coronary revascularization in the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG (Coronary Revascularization Demonstrating Outcome Study in Kyoto Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting) registry cohort-2 and 3, we compared clinical characteristics and outcomes between patients with and without risk factors stratified by their presentation (STEMI n = 8,312, NSTE-ACS n = 3,386, and CCS n = 18,400). Patients with risk factors were defined as having at least one of the following risk factors: hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, and current smoking. The proportion of patients without risk factors was low (STEMI: 369 patients [4.4%], NSTE-ACS: 110 patients [3.2%], and CCS: 462 patients [2.5%]). Patients without risk factors compared with those with risk factors more often had advanced age, low body weight, and malignancy and less often had history of atherosclerotic disease and prescription of optimal medical therapy. In patients with STEMI, patients without risk factors compared with those with risk factors were more often women and more often had atrial fibrillation, long door-to-balloon time, and severe hemodynamic compromise. During a median of 5.6 years follow-up, patients without risk factors compared with those with risk factors had higher crude incidence of all-cause death. After adjusting confounders, the mortality risk was significant in patients with CCS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01 to 1.49, p = 0.04) but not in patients with STEMI (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.27, p = 0.52) and NSTE-ACS (HR 1.07, 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.54, p = 0.73). In conclusion, among patients undergoing coronary revascularization, patients without standard cardiovascular risk factors had higher crude incidence of all-cause death compared with those with at least one risk factor. After adjusting confounders, the mortality risk was significant in patients with CCS but not in patients with STEMI and NSTE-ACS.

摘要

最近,一项观察性研究表明,与有标准心血管危险因素的患者相比,无标准心血管危险因素的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者死亡率更高。这一意外结果应在其他人群中进行评估,包括非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)和慢性冠状动脉综合征(CCS)患者。在CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG(京都经皮冠状动脉介入治疗/冠状动脉旁路移植术冠状动脉血运重建结局研究)登记队列2和队列3中连续接受首次冠状动脉血运重建的30098例患者中,我们比较了根据表现分层的有危险因素和无危险因素患者的临床特征及结局(STEMI患者8312例,NSTE-ACS患者3386例,CCS患者18400例)。有危险因素的患者被定义为至少具有以下危险因素之一:高血压、血脂异常、糖尿病和当前吸烟。无危险因素患者的比例较低(STEMI:369例患者[4.4%],NSTE-ACS:110例患者[3.2%],CCS:462例患者[2.5%])。与有危险因素的患者相比,无危险因素的患者更常为高龄、体重低且患有恶性肿瘤,而较少有动脉粥样硬化疾病史和接受最佳药物治疗。在STEMI患者中,与有危险因素的患者相比,无危险因素的患者更常为女性,且更常发生心房颤动、门球时间长和严重血流动力学障碍。在中位5.6年的随访期间,与有危险因素的患者相比,无危险因素的患者全因死亡的粗发病率更高。在调整混杂因素后,CCS患者的死亡风险显著(风险比[HR]1.22,95%置信区间[CI]1.01至1.49,p = 0.04),但STEMI患者(HR 1.06,95%CI 0.89至1.27,p = 0.52)和NSTE-ACS患者(HR 1.07,95%CI 0.74至1.54,p = 0.73)的死亡风险不显著。总之,在接受冠状动脉血运重建的患者中,与至少有一个危险因素的患者相比,无标准心血管危险因素的患者全因死亡的粗发病率更高。调整混杂因素后,CCS患者的死亡风险显著,但STEMI患者和NSTE-ACS患者的死亡风险不显著。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索