Suppr超能文献

无标准可调节风险因素(SMuRFless)与≥1 个 SMuRF ACS 病例之间的临床特征、管理和 5 年生存率比较:来自巴基斯坦的 15051 例分析。

Clinical characteristics, management, and 5-year survival compared between no standard modifiable risk factor (SMuRFless) and ≥ 1 SMuRF ACS cases: an analysis of 15,051 cases from Pakistan.

机构信息

Department of clinical research cardiology, Tabba Heart Institute, ST-1, Federal 'B' area, block 2, Karachi, 75950, Pakistan.

Department of clinical cardiology, Tabba Heart Institute, Karachi, Pakistan.

出版信息

BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023 Jun 24;23(1):320. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03355-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There has been an increase in Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) patients without standard modifiable risk factors i.e. hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and tobacco use (SMuRFless) compared to the patients with ≥ 1 SMuRF but this has not been studied in South Asia despite them being a high-risk population. We conducted a comparative analysis of first episodes of ACS cases admitted to a tertiary cardiac center in Pakistan between SMuRFless and ≥ 1 SMuRF patients for clinical presentation, management, in-hospital, and 5-year mortality.

METHODS

We undertook a retrospective study and data of 15,051 patients admitted at Tabba Heart Institute (THI) with the first episode of ACS was extracted from Chest Pain-MI™, and the CathPCI Registry® registry affiliated with the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR®), USA. Logistic regression and Cox proportional algorithm yielded odds ratio (OR) and hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for associated factors of in-patient and 5-year mortality.

RESULTS

There were 15% SMuRFless cases and in-hospital mortality was 4.1% in SMuRFless vs. 3.9% in the ≥ 1 SMuRF group (p-0.59), the difference remained insignificant after adjusting for age, gender, Killip class, multivessel disease, type of ACS, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (Adjusted OR:1.1 [0.8, 1.3]. Unadjusted 5-year mortality was 40% lower in the SMuRFless group but the difference was insignificant after adjusting for age, gender, disease at presentation, its severity, and management (Adjusted HR 0.7 95% CI[0.5, 1.0]). STEMI, NSTEMI, Killip class, and multivessel disease increased the risk of overall 5-year mortality.

CONCLUSION

In-hospital and 5-year mortality was not different between the SMuRFless and ≥ 1 SMuRF group, there is a need to understand mediators of immediate and long-term mortality risk in SMuRFless patients.

摘要

背景

与至少有一种 SMuRF 的 ACS 患者相比,患有急性冠状动脉综合征 (ACS) 但无标准可改变危险因素(即高血压、糖尿病、血脂异常和吸烟)的患者有所增加(SMuRFless),但南亚地区尚未对此进行研究,尽管他们是高危人群。我们对巴基斯坦一家三级心脏中心收治的 SMuRFless 和 ≥1SMuRF 患者的首次 ACS 发作病例进行了临床特征、治疗、住院期间和 5 年死亡率的比较分析。

方法

我们进行了一项回顾性研究,从美国国家心血管数据注册中心 (NCDR®) 附属的 ChestPain-MI™ 和 CathPCI Registry® 注册表中提取了在 Tabba 心脏研究所 (THI) 首次发作 ACS 的 15051 名患者的数据。逻辑回归和 Cox 比例风险算法得出了住院和 5 年死亡率相关因素的优势比 (OR) 和风险比 (HR),置信区间为 95%。

结果

SMuRFless 病例占 15%,住院死亡率为 4.1%SMuRFless 与≥1SMuRF 组的 3.9%(p-0.59),调整年龄、性别、Killip 分级、多血管疾病、ACS 类型、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)和冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)后差异无统计学意义(调整 OR:1.1 [0.8, 1.3]。SMuRFless 组未经调整的 5 年死亡率降低了 40%,但调整年龄、性别、发病时的疾病及其严重程度和治疗后差异无统计学意义(调整 HR 0.7 95%CI[0.5, 1.0])。STEMI、NSTEMI、Killip 分级和多血管疾病增加了全因 5 年死亡率的风险。

结论

SMuRFless 组和≥1SMuRF 组的住院和 5 年死亡率无差异,需要了解 SMuRFless 患者即刻和长期死亡风险的中介因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71fd/10290799/d49050e93616/12872_2023_3355_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验