Guo Weihong, Wang Yunfeng, Tian Aoxi, Yi Jiayi, Liu Jiamin, Zhang Haibo, Li Jing, Hu Shengshou, Li Xi, Zheng Xin
National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 100037 Beijing, China.
Central China Sub-center of the National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, 450000 Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Sep 5;24(9):249. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2409249. eCollection 2023 Sep.
Little is known of the characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) but without standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRFs, including smoking, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, and hypertension) in developing countries like China. Moreover, contributors to the excess mortality of such SMuRF-less patients remain unclear.
This study was based on a nationally representative sample of patients presenting with STEMI and admitted to 162 hospitals in 31 provinces across mainland China between 2001 and 2015. We compared clinical characteristics, treatments, and mortality during hospitalization between patients with and without SMuRFs. We also investigated the possible causes of differences in mortality and quantified the contributors to excess mortality.
Among 16,541 patients (aged 65 13 years; 30.0% women), 19.9% were SMuRF-less. These patients were older (69 vs. 65 years), experienced more cardiogenic shock and lower blood pressure at admission, and were less likely to be admitted to the cardiac ward compared to patients with SMuRFs. Moreover, SMuRF-less patients received treatment less often, including primary percutaneous coronary intervention (17.3% vs. 28.8%, 0.001), dual antiplatelet therapy (59.4% vs. 77.0%, 0.001), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (49.9% vs. 68.1%, 0.001), and statins (69.9% vs. 85.1%, 0.001). They had higher in-hospital mortality (18.5% vs. 10.5%, 0.001), with 56.1% of deaths occurring within 24 hours of admission. Although the difference in mortality decreased after adjusting for patient characteristics, it remained significant and concerning (odds ratio (OR) 1.41; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25-1.59). Mediation analysis found that, in patients without SMuRFs, underutilization of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers and statins contributed to an excess mortality risk of 22.4% and 32.5%, respectively.
Attention and action are urgently needed for STEMI patients without SMuRFs, given their high incidence and excess in-hospital mortality. The use of timely and adequate evidence-based treatments should be strengthened.
在中国等发展中国家,对于无标准可改变心血管危险因素(SMuRFs,包括吸烟、高胆固醇血症、糖尿病和高血压)的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者的特征、治疗及预后了解甚少。此外,此类无SMuRFs患者额外死亡的影响因素仍不明确。
本研究基于2001年至2015年期间中国大陆31个省份162家医院收治的具有全国代表性的STEMI患者样本。我们比较了有无SMuRFs患者的临床特征、治疗情况及住院期间的死亡率。我们还调查了死亡率差异的可能原因,并对额外死亡的影响因素进行了量化。
在16541例患者(年龄65±13岁;30.0%为女性)中。19.9%无SMuRFs。与有SMuRFs的患者相比,这些患者年龄更大(69岁对65岁),入院时发生心源性休克更多且血压更低,入住心脏病房的可能性更小。此外,无SMuRFs的患者接受治疗的频率更低,包括直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(17.3%对28.8%,P<0.001)、双联抗血小板治疗(59.4%对77.0%,P<0.001)、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(49.9%对68.1%,P<0.001)以及他汀类药物(69.9%对85.1%,P<0.001)。他们的住院死亡率更高(18.5%对10.5%,P<0.001),56.1%的死亡发生在入院后24小时内。尽管在调整患者特征后死亡率差异有所减小,但仍具有显著统计学意义且令人担忧(优势比(OR)1.41;95%置信区间(CI)1.25 - 1.59)。中介分析发现,在无SMuRFs的患者中,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂和他汀类药物使用不足分别导致额外死亡风险增加22.4%和32.5%。
鉴于无SMuRFs的STEMI患者发病率高且住院死亡率高,迫切需要对其予以关注并采取行动。应加强及时、充分的循证治疗的应用。