• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于 COVID-19 检测的监督机器学习方法和数据分析概述。

An Overview of Supervised Machine Learning Methods and Data Analysis for COVID-19 Detection.

机构信息

Department of Computer Engineering, College of Technology, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon.

Department of Training, Research Development and Innovation, InchTech's Solutions, Yaoundé, Cameroon.

出版信息

J Healthc Eng. 2021 Nov 22;2021:4733167. doi: 10.1155/2021/4733167. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1155/2021/4733167
PMID:34853669
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8629644/
Abstract

METHODS

Our analysis and machine learning algorithm is based on most cited two clinical datasets from the literature: one from San Raffaele Hospital Milan Italia and the other from Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein São Paulo Brasilia. The datasets were processed to select the best features that most influence the target, and it turned out that almost all of them are blood parameters. EDA (Exploratory Data Analysis) methods were applied to the datasets, and a comparative study of supervised machine learning models was done, after which the support vector machine (SVM) was selected as the one with the best performance.

RESULTS

SVM being the best performant is used as our proposed supervised machine learning algorithm. An accuracy of 99.29%, sensitivity of 92.79%, and specificity of 100% were obtained with the dataset from Kaggle (https://www.kaggle.com/einsteindata4u/covid19) after applying optimization to SVM. The same procedure and work were performed with the dataset taken from San Raffaele Hospital (https://zenodo.org/record/3886927#.YIluB5AzbMV). Once more, the SVM presented the best performance among other machine learning algorithms, and 92.86%, 93.55%, and 90.91% for accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, respectively, were obtained.

CONCLUSION

The obtained results, when compared with others from the literature based on these same datasets, are superior, leading us to conclude that our proposed solution is reliable for the COVID-19 diagnosis.

摘要

方法

我们的分析和机器学习算法基于文献中最常引用的两个临床数据集:一个来自意大利米兰的圣拉斐尔医院,另一个来自巴西圣保罗的以色列爱因斯坦医院。对这些数据集进行了处理,以选择对目标影响最大的最佳特征,结果发现几乎所有特征都是血液参数。应用探索性数据分析(EDA)方法对数据集进行了分析,并对监督机器学习模型进行了比较研究,之后选择支持向量机(SVM)作为性能最佳的模型。

结果

SVM 是表现最佳的模型,被用作我们提出的监督机器学习算法。在对 Kaggle 数据集(https://www.kaggle.com/einsteindata4u/covid19)应用优化后,获得了 99.29%的准确率、92.79%的灵敏度和 100%的特异性。对来自圣拉斐尔医院的数据集(https://zenodo.org/record/3886927#.YIluB5AzbMV)也进行了相同的处理和工作。同样,SVM 在其他机器学习算法中表现最佳,分别获得了 92.86%、93.55%和 90.91%的准确率、灵敏度和特异性。

结论

与基于这些相同数据集的文献中的其他结果相比,我们的方法得到的结果更为出色,这使我们得出结论,我们提出的解决方案可靠适用于 COVID-19 的诊断。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e867/8629644/58092eea72fb/JHE2021-4733167.014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e867/8629644/6c9cb052013d/JHE2021-4733167.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e867/8629644/2d3432547e4c/JHE2021-4733167.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e867/8629644/fc6d44f8fa2f/JHE2021-4733167.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e867/8629644/4373175ba166/JHE2021-4733167.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e867/8629644/822a082f4e20/JHE2021-4733167.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e867/8629644/0195a5a88f5c/JHE2021-4733167.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e867/8629644/a791a2469568/JHE2021-4733167.007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e867/8629644/5ffccee32d8b/JHE2021-4733167.008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e867/8629644/7412a5910d78/JHE2021-4733167.009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e867/8629644/8b459258da80/JHE2021-4733167.010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e867/8629644/01dcd13476f5/JHE2021-4733167.011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e867/8629644/74ae5276bca5/JHE2021-4733167.012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e867/8629644/58b347999755/JHE2021-4733167.013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e867/8629644/58092eea72fb/JHE2021-4733167.014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e867/8629644/6c9cb052013d/JHE2021-4733167.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e867/8629644/2d3432547e4c/JHE2021-4733167.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e867/8629644/fc6d44f8fa2f/JHE2021-4733167.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e867/8629644/4373175ba166/JHE2021-4733167.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e867/8629644/822a082f4e20/JHE2021-4733167.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e867/8629644/0195a5a88f5c/JHE2021-4733167.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e867/8629644/a791a2469568/JHE2021-4733167.007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e867/8629644/5ffccee32d8b/JHE2021-4733167.008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e867/8629644/7412a5910d78/JHE2021-4733167.009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e867/8629644/8b459258da80/JHE2021-4733167.010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e867/8629644/01dcd13476f5/JHE2021-4733167.011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e867/8629644/74ae5276bca5/JHE2021-4733167.012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e867/8629644/58b347999755/JHE2021-4733167.013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e867/8629644/58092eea72fb/JHE2021-4733167.014.jpg

相似文献

1
An Overview of Supervised Machine Learning Methods and Data Analysis for COVID-19 Detection.用于 COVID-19 检测的监督机器学习方法和数据分析概述。
J Healthc Eng. 2021 Nov 22;2021:4733167. doi: 10.1155/2021/4733167. eCollection 2021.
2
Classification Models for COVID-19 Test Prioritization in Brazil: Machine Learning Approach.巴西 COVID-19 检测优先级分类模型:机器学习方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 8;23(4):e27293. doi: 10.2196/27293.
3
Comparison of supervised machine learning classification techniques in prediction of locoregional recurrences in early oral tongue cancer.比较早期口腔舌癌局部区域复发预测中监督机器学习分类技术。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Apr;136:104068. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.104068. Epub 2019 Dec 28.
4
Comparison of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Classifying of Home Discharge Possibility in Convalescent Stroke Patients: A Secondary Analysis.基于机器学习的监督算法在恢复期脑卒中患者居家康复可能性分类中的比较:二次分析。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 Oct;30(10):106011. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.106011. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
5
Benchmarking of Machine Learning classifiers on plasma proteomic for COVID-19 severity prediction through interpretable artificial intelligence.基于机器学习的分类器在 COVID-19 严重程度预测血浆蛋白质组学中的基准测试:通过可解释的人工智能。
Artif Intell Med. 2023 Mar;137:102490. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2023.102490. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
6
Comparing different supervised machine learning algorithms for disease prediction.比较不同的监督机器学习算法在疾病预测中的应用。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Dec 21;19(1):281. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-1004-8.
7
SARS-CoV-2 Prediction Strategy Based on Classification Algorithms from a Full Blood Examination.基于全血检查分类算法的 SARS-CoV-2 预测策略。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2023 Aug 22;2023:3248192. doi: 10.1155/2023/3248192. eCollection 2023.
8
Data-driven diagnosis of spinal abnormalities using feature selection and machine learning algorithms.基于特征选择和机器学习算法的脊柱异常数据驱动诊断。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 6;15(2):e0228422. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228422. eCollection 2020.
9
Sequential Learning on sEMGs in Short- and Long-term Situations via Self-training Semi-supervised Support Vector Machine.基于自训练半监督支持向量机的短时间和长时间内 sEMG 序列学习。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2022 Jul;2022:3183-3186. doi: 10.1109/EMBC48229.2022.9871311.
10
Soft Clustering for Enhancing the Diagnosis of Chronic Diseases over Machine Learning Algorithms.基于机器学习算法的软聚类在慢性病诊断中的应用。
J Healthc Eng. 2020 Mar 9;2020:4984967. doi: 10.1155/2020/4984967. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Deep learning-based characterization of neutrophil activation phenotypes in human blood infections.基于深度学习的人类血液感染中中性粒细胞激活表型的特征分析
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2024 Mar 18;23:1260-1273. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.03.006. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
A Novel Image Processing Method for Obtaining an Accurate Three-Dimensional Profile of Red Blood Cells in Digital Holographic Microscopy.一种用于在数字全息显微镜中获取红细胞精确三维轮廓的新型图像处理方法。
Biomimetics (Basel). 2023 Nov 22;8(8):563. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics8080563.
3
A Survey of COVID-19 Diagnosis Using Routine Blood Tests with the Aid of Artificial Intelligence Techniques.

本文引用的文献

1
Biomedical Image Classification in a Big Data Architecture Using Machine Learning Algorithms.基于机器学习算法的大数据架构中的生物医学图像分类。
J Healthc Eng. 2021 May 30;2021:9998819. doi: 10.1155/2021/9998819. eCollection 2021.
2
COVID-19 diagnosis by routine blood tests using machine learning.利用机器学习通过常规血液检测诊断 COVID-19。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 24;11(1):10738. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90265-9.
3
Explaining machine learning based diagnosis of COVID-19 from routine blood tests with decision trees and criteria graphs.
借助人工智能技术利用常规血液检测进行新冠病毒诊断的调查
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 May 16;13(10):1749. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13101749.
4
A Social Network Analysis Approach to Evaluate the Relationship Between the Mobility Network Metrics and the COVID-19 Outbreak.一种用于评估移动网络指标与新冠疫情之间关系的社会网络分析方法。
Health Serv Insights. 2023 May 17;16:11786329231173816. doi: 10.1177/11786329231173816. eCollection 2023.
用决策树和准则图解释基于常规血液检测的 COVID-19 机器学习诊断。
Comput Biol Med. 2021 May;132:104335. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104335. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
4
Ensemble learning model for diagnosing COVID-19 from routine blood tests.基于常规血液检测诊断新冠肺炎的集成学习模型
Inform Med Unlocked. 2020;21:100449. doi: 10.1016/j.imu.2020.100449. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
5
Consultation length and no-show prediction for improving appointment scheduling efficiency at a cardiology clinic: A data analytics approach.咨询时长和失约预测,以提高心脏病学诊所的预约安排效率:一种数据分析方法。
Int J Med Inform. 2021 Jan;145:104290. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104290. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
6
Using machine learning of clinical data to diagnose COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.使用临床数据的机器学习诊断 COVID-19:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Sep 29;20(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01266-z.
7
Routine Laboratory Blood Tests Predict SARS-CoV-2 Infection Using Machine Learning.常规实验室血液检测可通过机器学习预测 SARS-CoV-2 感染。
Clin Chem. 2020 Nov 1;66(11):1396-1404. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvaa200.
8
Use of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence to predict SARS-CoV-2 infection from Full Blood Counts in a population.利用机器学习和人工智能从人群的全血细胞计数中预测 SARS-CoV-2 感染。
Int Immunopharmacol. 2020 Sep;86:106705. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106705. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
9
Pathophysiology, Transmission, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Review.新型冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)的病理生理学、传播、诊断和治疗:综述。
JAMA. 2020 Aug 25;324(8):782-793. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.12839.
10
Detection of COVID-19 Infection from Routine Blood Exams with Machine Learning: A Feasibility Study.利用机器学习从常规血液检查中检测 COVID-19 感染:一项可行性研究。
J Med Syst. 2020 Jul 1;44(8):135. doi: 10.1007/s10916-020-01597-4.