Gottlieb Michael, Heinrich Scott, Gore Katarzyna
Emergency Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, USA.
Cureus. 2021 Oct 25;13(10):e19022. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19022. eCollection 2021 Oct.
Introduction The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requires annual reporting of resident scholarly activities. However, this can be time-consuming for both residents and residency leadership and may not contain the most accurate or up-to-date information. This study sought to determine whether Google Scholar could adequately identify resident publications when compared with their ACGME self-report. Methods This was a cross-sectional study comparing resident Google Scholar publications with their ACGME self-reported data from 2018 to 2020. Manuscripts were only included if they were published prior to June 30, 2020, and while the participant was a resident at Rush University Medical Center. We did not count articles published prior to beginning residency. We independently collected data from the residents' self-report and Google Scholar profiles and compared the results. We assessed the overall concordance between data. When a discordant publication was identified, it was reviewed in full and discussed with the resident to ensure that it was correctly attributed to the resident. Data were presented primarily as descriptive statistics including percentages. Results Of 24 (96%) residents, 23 created Google Scholar profiles. There were 22 total publications. Google Scholar was concordant with self-report in 18 (78.3%) instances and discordant in five (21.7%) cases. In all five residents (n = 9 publications), the discordant publication was correctly identified by Google Scholar despite not being reported by the resident in their ACGME self-report. Conclusion We found that resident Google Scholar accounts resulted in the identification of publications that had not been previously reported on their ACGME self-report without missing any relevant publications.
引言 研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)要求每年报告住院医师的学术活动。然而,这对住院医师和住院医师培训项目负责人来说都可能很耗时,而且可能不包含最准确或最新的信息。本研究旨在确定与ACGME自我报告相比,谷歌学术能否充分识别住院医师的出版物。方法 这是一项横断面研究,比较了住院医师在谷歌学术上的出版物与他们2018年至2020年ACGME自我报告的数据。仅纳入在2020年6月30日之前发表且参与者为拉什大学医学中心住院医师期间发表的手稿。我们不计算住院医师培训开始前发表的文章。我们独立收集了住院医师自我报告和谷歌学术个人资料中的数据,并比较了结果。我们评估了数据之间的总体一致性。当发现不一致的出版物时,会对其进行全面审查并与住院医师进行讨论,以确保正确地将其归属于该住院医师。数据主要以包括百分比在内的描述性统计数据呈现。结果 在24名(96%)住院医师中,23人创建了谷歌学术个人资料。总共有22篇出版物。谷歌学术与自我报告在18例(78.3%)中一致,在5例(21.7%)中不一致。在所有5名住院医师(共9篇出版物)中,尽管住院医师在ACGME自我报告中未报告,但谷歌学术正确识别了不一致的出版物。结论 我们发现,住院医师的谷歌学术账户能够识别出之前在ACGME自我报告中未报告的出版物,且没有遗漏任何相关出版物。