Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Maulana Azad Institute of Dental Sciences, New Delhi, 110002, India.
Lasers Med Sci. 2022 Apr;37(3):2063-2070. doi: 10.1007/s10103-021-03480-1. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
This randomized clinical trial aimed to compare the efficacy of topical aloe vera with low-level laser therapy in patients with oral lichen planus (OLP). A randomized, parallel arm, single-blind study comprising of 60 patients with OLP was randomly divided into two groups. Group A was given topical aloe vera extract gel applied thrice daily for 2 months, and group B was given low-level laser therapy (LLLT) at 980 nm twice weekly for 2 months. Both groups were followed up for 9 months. Patients were assessed for various parameters according to the Escudier scale at baseline, after treatment at 9 months. Results were assessed using the McNemar-Bowker test and the Mann-Whitney U test. Both individual groups showed significant (p < 0.05) results at the end of the treatment period (0-2 months) and the follow-up period (2-7 months). Intergroup comparison showed significant results in the laser group (reduction of VAS by 44.1%, site score by 24.6%, and activity score by 50%) as compared with the aloe vera group (reduction of VAS by 26.7%, site score by 9.2%, and the activity score by 26%) in the treatment period. In the follow-up period, both groups showed insignificant differences in comparison to each other. Within the limitations of the study, LLLT was more effective as compared with topical aloe vera in managing oral lichen planus during the active treatment time, while both were equally effective during the follow-up period. The clinical study was registered under the Clinical Trials Registry India with the registration number CTRI/2018/04/013147.
这项随机临床试验旨在比较局部芦荟与低水平激光疗法在口腔扁平苔藓(OLP)患者中的疗效。一项随机、平行臂、单盲研究纳入了 60 名 OLP 患者,将其随机分为两组。A 组给予局部芦荟提取物凝胶,每日 3 次,持续 2 个月;B 组给予 980nm 低水平激光治疗,每周 2 次,持续 2 个月。两组均随访 9 个月。根据 Escudier 量表,在基线时、治疗 9 个月后评估患者的各项参数。采用 McNemar-Bowker 检验和 Mann-Whitney U 检验评估结果。两组在治疗期(0-2 个月)和随访期(2-7 个月)结束时均显示出显著(p<0.05)结果。组间比较显示,激光组在治疗期间(VAS 降低 44.1%,部位评分降低 24.6%,活动评分降低 50%)与芦荟组(VAS 降低 26.7%,部位评分降低 9.2%,活动评分降低 26%)相比,结果有显著差异。在随访期间,两组之间无显著差异。在研究的限制范围内,与局部应用芦荟相比,低水平激光治疗在治疗期间更有效地治疗口腔扁平苔藓,而在随访期间两者同样有效。该临床研究已在印度临床试验注册中心注册,注册号为 CTRI/2018/04/013147。