Department of Psychology, Neuroscience and Behaviour.
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Psychological Crisis Intervention.
Psychol Assess. 2022 Mar;34(3):271-280. doi: 10.1037/pas0001086. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
Temperament/personality research has been largely based on an imposed-etic strategy: Self-report temperament/personality inventories created in and reflecting American culture were tacitly assumed to apply in other countries and cultures. Correspondingly, invariance tests on the underlying phenomena and their associated constructs have been rarely applied in cross-cultural studies and in those instances unsuccessfully. To explore this oversight, we investigated whether a western-based anxious shyness measure was equivalent across eastern-western cultures (Chinese, = 816, 47.2% male; Canadian, = 995, 30.8% male). In the first instance, we used the well-established multigroup confirmatory factor analysis (MGCFA) to show that there was measurement noninvariance in the one factor shyness scale across the two countries and the two countries by sex. We further examined the issue of noninvariance using the newer alignment method, an approach providing detailed information on noninvariance for each country model by parameter (across intercepts and loadings) as an alternative to the MGCFA restrictive assessment of whole scale construct validation. The findings suggested acceptable approximate invariance in the shyness scale to support an unbiased comparison of mean levels between the two countries and the two countries by sex. Chinese young adults had significantly higher mean levels of shyness than Canadian young adults. Despite some limited noninvariance, we were able to conclude that the underlying construct of shyness as measured in this study was equivalent across Chinese and Canadian cultures. Findings illustrated the difficulties and importance of first establishing fundamental measurement properties and equivalence in personality constructs before inferring cross-cultural universality in complex traits and characteristics. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
气质/人格研究在很大程度上基于一种强加的策略:在和反映美国文化的自我报告气质/人格量表被默认为适用于其他国家和文化。相应地,跨文化研究中很少应用潜在现象及其相关结构的不变性检验,而且在这些情况下也没有成功。为了探讨这一疏忽,我们调查了一个基于西方的焦虑害羞量表是否在东西方文化中具有等效性(中国,n=816,47.2%为男性;加拿大,n=995,30.8%为男性)。首先,我们使用成熟的多群组验证性因素分析(MGCFA)表明,在两个国家和两个国家的两个性别中,单一因素害羞量表存在测量不变性问题。我们进一步使用新的对齐方法来检查非不变性问题,这种方法提供了每个国家模型中参数(跨越截距和负荷)的非不变性的详细信息,作为对整个量表结构验证的 MGCFA 限制性评估的替代方法。研究结果表明,害羞量表具有可接受的近似不变性,支持对两个国家和两个国家的两个性别之间的平均水平进行无偏比较。中国年轻人的害羞程度显著高于加拿大年轻人。尽管存在一些有限的非不变性,但我们能够得出结论,本研究中测量的害羞的潜在结构在中加文化中是等效的。研究结果说明了在推断复杂特征和特征的跨文化普遍性之前,首先确定人格结构的基本测量特性和等效性的重要性和困难。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。