• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国学前儿童基于第一占有启发式的所有权推理。

Chinese preschoolers' ownership reasoning based on first possession heuristic.

机构信息

Institute of Social Psychology, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.

CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Dec 2;16(12):e0260335. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260335. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0260335
PMID:34855784
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8638959/
Abstract

First possession is a common heuristic people use to solve property conflicts. Previous studies examined whether young children judged ownership based on the first possession heuristic and its stability when conflicting with other cues such as labor, but few focused on the effects in the discovery context. In this study, we used two discovery stories which indicate the discovered object was not owned by anyone beforehand and investigated ownership reasoning with the first possession heuristic in Chinese 3- to 6-year-old preschoolers. By pitting the first possession cue against the labor cue, we investigated the stability of the first possession heuristic in young children's ownership reasoning. The results showed that in the condition where there was only the first possession cue, both the younger and older groups used the first possession heuristic to reason about ownership. However, in the labor condition, 5- and 6-year-olds ceased to support the first possessor and turned to assign objects to the laborer, whereas 3-year-old children still insisted on the first possession heuristic (Study 1 and Study 2). Children across four age groups did not assign ownership to the person who just played with the object but did not modify it (Study 2). The results demonstrate that Chinese preschoolers understand the role of first possession in ownership assignment at an early age in the discovery context but the elderly preschoolers do not rely on the first possession cue when there are conflicting cues such as labor.

摘要

第一占有是人们解决财产冲突常用的启发式策略。先前的研究检验了幼儿是否根据第一占有启发式来判断所有权,以及当与其他线索(如劳动)冲突时,该启发式的稳定性如何,但很少有研究关注发现情境中的影响。在这项研究中,我们使用了两个发现故事,这些故事表明之前没有人拥有被发现的物体,并调查了 3 至 6 岁学龄前儿童在发现情境中使用第一占有启发式进行所有权推理的情况。通过将第一占有线索与劳动线索进行对比,我们研究了幼儿所有权推理中第一占有启发式的稳定性。结果表明,在只有第一占有线索的情况下,年幼组和年长组都使用第一占有启发式来推理所有权。然而,在劳动条件下,5 岁和 6 岁的儿童不再支持第一占有者,而是将物体分配给劳动者,而 3 岁的儿童仍然坚持第一占有启发式(研究 1 和研究 2)。四个年龄组的儿童都不会将所有权分配给刚刚玩过但未修改过物体的人(研究 2)。研究结果表明,中国学龄前儿童在发现情境中很早就理解了第一占有在所有权分配中的作用,但年长的学龄前儿童在存在冲突线索(如劳动)时不会依赖第一占有线索。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e291/8638959/03c0c4e48ed9/pone.0260335.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e291/8638959/eced15c048a7/pone.0260335.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e291/8638959/ba5ee1f94e29/pone.0260335.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e291/8638959/5405f96f841c/pone.0260335.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e291/8638959/03c0c4e48ed9/pone.0260335.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e291/8638959/eced15c048a7/pone.0260335.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e291/8638959/ba5ee1f94e29/pone.0260335.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e291/8638959/5405f96f841c/pone.0260335.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e291/8638959/03c0c4e48ed9/pone.0260335.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Chinese preschoolers' ownership reasoning based on first possession heuristic.中国学前儿童基于第一占有启发式的所有权推理。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 2;16(12):e0260335. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260335. eCollection 2021.
2
Determining who owns what: do children infer ownership from first possession?确定谁拥有什么:儿童会从首次占有推断所有权吗?
Cognition. 2008 Jun;107(3):829-49. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.002. Epub 2008 Feb 20.
3
Possession is not always the law: with age, preschoolers increasingly use verbal information to identify who owns what.拥有并不总是合法的:随着年龄的增长,学龄前儿童越来越多地使用口头信息来识别谁拥有什么。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2012 Oct;113(2):259-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.06.008. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
4
Effect of transfer type on labor's role in ownership judgments.转移类型对劳动者在所有权判断中所扮演角色的影响。
Psych J. 2020 Aug;9(4):553-561. doi: 10.1002/pchj.340. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
5
First possession, history, and young children's ownership judgments.首次占有、历史和幼儿的所有权判断。
Child Dev. 2013 Sep-Oct;84(5):1519-25. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12080. Epub 2013 Mar 8.
6
Who Is the Rightful Owner? Young Children's Ownership Judgments in Different Transfer Contexts.谁是合法所有者?幼儿在不同转让情境下的所有权判断
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 31;9:1314. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01314. eCollection 2018.
7
"Because It's Hers": When Preschoolers Use Ownership in Their Explanations.“因为这是她的”:当学龄前儿童在解释中使用所有权概念时。
Cogn Sci. 2017 Apr;41(3):827-843. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12358. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
8
Late Emergence of the First Possession Heuristic: Evidence From a Small-Scale Culture.首获启发式的后期出现:来自小规模文化的证据。
Child Dev. 2015 Jul;86(4):1282-1289. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12365. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
9
Who knows what? Preschoolers appreciate the link between ownership and knowledge.谁知道呢?学龄前儿童就已经懂得了所有权和知识之间的联系。
Dev Psychol. 2020 May;56(5):880-887. doi: 10.1037/dev0000918. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
10
Determining social power: Do Chinese preschoolers integrate verbal and nonverbal cues?判断社会权力:中国学龄前儿童整合言语和非言语线索吗?
J Exp Child Psychol. 2021 Apr;204:104943. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104943. Epub 2020 Dec 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of transfer type on labor's role in ownership judgments.转移类型对劳动者在所有权判断中所扮演角色的影响。
Psych J. 2020 Aug;9(4):553-561. doi: 10.1002/pchj.340. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
2
Exploring the first possessor bias in children.探究儿童的首位拥有者偏见。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 17;14(1):e0209422. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209422. eCollection 2019.
3
Who Is the Rightful Owner? Young Children's Ownership Judgments in Different Transfer Contexts.谁是合法所有者?幼儿在不同转让情境下的所有权判断
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 31;9:1314. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01314. eCollection 2018.
4
Developing Digital Privacy: Children's Moral Judgments Concerning Mobile GPS Devices.发展数字隐私:儿童对移动 GPS 设备的道德判断。
Child Dev. 2018 Jan;89(1):17-26. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12826. Epub 2017 May 7.
5
Ownership Dilemmas: The Case of Finders Versus Landowners.
Cogn Sci. 2017 Apr;41 Suppl 3:502-522. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12486. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
6
People's Judgments About Classic Property Law Cases.人们对经典物权法案例的判断。
Hum Nat. 2015 Jun;26(2):184-209. doi: 10.1007/s12110-015-9230-y.
7
Late Emergence of the First Possession Heuristic: Evidence From a Small-Scale Culture.首获启发式的后期出现:来自小规模文化的证据。
Child Dev. 2015 Jul;86(4):1282-1289. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12365. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
8
Ownership reasoning in children across cultures.不同文化背景下儿童的所有权推理。
Cognition. 2014 Sep;132(3):471-84. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.04.014. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
9
The effect of labour on ownership decisions in two cultures: developmental evidence from Japan and the United Kingdom.劳动对两种文化中所有权决策的影响:来自日本和英国的发展证据。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2014 Sep;32(3):320-9. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12043. Epub 2014 Apr 26.
10
No one likes a copycat: a cross-cultural investigation of children's response to plagiarism.没有人喜欢抄袭者:一项跨文化的儿童对抄袭行为反应的研究。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2014 May;121:111-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.11.008. Epub 2014 Jan 29.