Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Morelos, México.
Escuela de Negocios, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Peñalolén, Chile.
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 2;16(12):e0260693. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260693. eCollection 2021.
In June 2016, Chile implemented the Law of Food Labelling and Advertising, which included a mandatory front-of-pack warning labels on food and beverages high in added sugar, saturated fat, sodium or energy density, restrictions on child-directed marketing and on the promotion and sales of these products in schools. The regulation does not include taxes although Chile had implemented a tiered tax on SSBs two years before this law was implemented. Therefore, the objective of the study was to simulate the impact of taxing food and beverages based on the cutoff's points for warning labels on purchases and revenues.
We derived price elasticities using the linear approximation of the almost ideal demand system for six groups of labeled food and beverages (with a warning label based on the regulation) and unlabeled (with no warning label): 1) unlabeled beverages, 2) labeled beverages, 3) unlabeled cereal based products, 4) labeled cereal based products, 5) labeled meat and fish and 6) labeled sweet snacks and desserts. The study used data on household food beverage purchases from the Kantar WorldPanel Chile and Euromonitor sales to adjust the Kantar elasticity results to the national average. We estimated revenues under three tax scenarios for all labeled food and beverages: 10%, 20%, 30% of the final price excluding taxes.
Except for labeled fish and meat, all food and beverage groups were price elastic. After accounting for a reduction in consumption after the taxes, economic and population growth, revenues for all groups could reach between 457 million USD to 1.3 billion USD. These results based on the much larger tax base of these labeled "high in added sugar, salt or saturated fat or energy density" foods and beverages is much larger.
This fiscal package could be implemented in countries with warning labels to enhance health and welfare. The Chilean warning label front-of-the-package system provides an important guide for countries considering policies to reduce diet-related non communicable diseases, including obesity. The fiscal policy impact alone, as shown here for Chile, will be highly impactful in reducing ultra-processed food intake and generating revenues.
2016 年 6 月,智利实施了《食品标签和广告法》,其中包括对高添加糖、饱和脂肪、钠或能量密度的食品和饮料实施强制性的前置警告标签,限制针对儿童的营销以及在学校推广和销售这些产品。该法规不包括税收,尽管智利在实施这项法律之前两年已经对 SSB 征收了分级税。因此,本研究的目的是根据警告标签法规的截止点模拟对食品和饮料征税对购买和收入的影响。
我们使用近似理想需求系统的线性近似值为六组标记食品和饮料(基于法规的警告标签)和未标记食品和饮料(无警告标签)得出价格弹性:1)未标记饮料,2)标记饮料,3)未标记谷物基产品,4)标记谷物基产品,5)标记肉类和鱼类,6)标记甜零食和甜点。本研究使用 Kantar WorldPanel Chile 和 Euromonitor 销售的家庭食品和饮料购买数据来调整 Kantar 弹性结果,以适应全国平均水平。我们为所有标记食品和饮料估计了三种税收情景下的收入:10%、20%、30%的不含税最终价格。
除了标记的鱼和肉外,所有食品和饮料组均具有价格弹性。在考虑税收后消费减少、经济和人口增长的情况下,所有组别的收入都可能达到 4.57 亿美元至 13 亿美元。这些结果基于这些标记的“高添加糖、盐或饱和脂肪或能量密度”食品和饮料的更大税收基础,因此要大得多。
在有警告标签的国家实施这种财政一揽子计划可以增进健康和福利。智利的前置警告标签包装系统为考虑采取政策减少与饮食有关的非传染性疾病(包括肥胖)的国家提供了重要指导。仅从财政政策的影响来看,如智利所示,将对减少超加工食品的摄入和产生收入产生重大影响。