Caro Juan Carlos, Smith-Taillie Lindsey, Ng Shu Wen, Popkin Barry
National Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology (INTA),University of Chile, Santiago.
Carolina Population Center and Dept of Nutrition, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina.
Food Policy. 2017 Aug;71:86-100. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
The global shift towards diets high in sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) and energy dense ultra-processed foods is linked to higher prevalence of obesity, diabetes and most other noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), causing significant health costs. Chile has the highest SSB consumption in the world, very high junk food intake and very rapid increases in these poor components of the diet plus obesity prevalence. This study's purpose is to compare the effect of different tax schemes for SSBs and ultra-processed foods on nutrient availability, utilizing price-elasticities, which are estimated from a Quadratic Almost Ideal Demand System model, using the 2011-2012 Income and Expenditure survey. We take into account the high proportion of households not purchasing various food and beverage groups (censored nature of data). The food groups considered were: sweets and desserts; salty snacks and chips; meat products and fats; fruits, vegetables and seafood; cereals and cereal products; SSB ready-to-drink; SSB from concentrate; plain water, coffee and tea; and milk, which together represent 90% of food expenditures. The simulated taxes were: (1) 40% price tax on SSBs(22% above the current tax level); (2) a 5 cents per gram of sugar tax on products with added sugar; and (3) 30% price tax on all foods(27% above current tax levels) and beverages (12% above the current tax level) exceeding thresholds on sodium, saturated fat, and added sugar and for which marketing is restricted (based on a Chilean law, effective June 16 2016). Unhealthy foods are price-elastic (-1.99 for salty snacks and chips, -1.06 for SSBs ready-to-drink, and -1.27 for SSBs from concentrate), meaning that the change in consumption is proportionally larger with respect to a change in price. Results are robust to different model specification, and consistent among different socioeconomic sub-populations. Overall, the tax on marketing controlled foods and beverages is associated with the largest reduction in household purchases of sodium, added sugar, saturated fat and calorie purchases. Chile is unique in currently having instituted a small current SSB tax as well as marketing controls and front-of-package labeling of unhealthy foods and beverages. The design of a larger, more comprehensive tax to enhance the overall effect of these policies on healthier diets is a next critical step. This study shows that a large tax on the same foods and beverages already delineated as unhealthy by the marketing controls and front-of-pack labeling should prove to be more effective for promoting a healthier diet.
全球饮食向高糖饮料(SSB)和能量密集型超加工食品转变,这与肥胖、糖尿病及大多数其他非传染性疾病(NCD)的更高患病率相关,导致了巨大的健康成本。智利是世界上SSB消费量最高的国家,垃圾食品摄入量极高,且这些不良饮食成分以及肥胖患病率增长非常迅速。本研究的目的是利用价格弹性比较不同的SSB和超加工食品税收方案对营养物质可获得性的影响,价格弹性是根据二次几乎理想需求系统模型,使用2011 - 2012年收入和支出调查估算得出的。我们考虑了未购买各类食品和饮料的家庭所占的高比例(数据的删失性质)。所考虑的食品类别包括:糖果和甜点;咸味小吃和薯片;肉类产品和脂肪;水果、蔬菜和海鲜;谷物及谷物制品;即饮型SSB;浓缩型SSB;白开水、咖啡和茶;以及牛奶,这些类别合计占食品支出的90%。模拟的税收方案为:(1)对SSB征收40%的价格税(比当前税率高22%);(2)对添加糖的产品每克征收5美分的糖税;(3)对所有超过钠、饱和脂肪和添加糖阈值且营销受限的食品(根据智利法律,2016年6月16日生效)和饮料分别征收30%的价格税(食品比当前税率高27%,饮料比当前税率高12%)。不健康食品具有价格弹性(咸味小吃和薯片为-1.99,即饮型SSB为-1.06,浓缩型SSB为-1.27),这意味着消费变化相对于价格变化成比例地更大。结果对于不同的模型设定具有稳健性,并且在不同社会经济亚群体中保持一致。总体而言,对营销受限的食品和饮料征税与家庭购买的钠、添加糖、饱和脂肪和卡路里购买量的最大降幅相关。智利目前已对SSB征收小额现行税,并对不健康食品和饮料实施营销控制及包装正面标签,这一点很独特。设计一项更大、更全面的税收以增强这些政策对更健康饮食的总体影响是下一个关键步骤。本研究表明,对已被营销控制和包装正面标签划定为不健康的相同食品和饮料征收高额税对于促进更健康的饮食应会更有效。