文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

辩证行为疗法移动应用程序的内容与可用性系统评价。

A systematic review of dialectical behavior therapy mobile apps for content and usability.

作者信息

Wilks Chelsey R, Gurtovenko Kyrill, Rebmann Kevin, Williamson James, Lovell Josh, Wasil Akash R

机构信息

Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri-St. Louis, 1 University Way, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Washington, USA.

出版信息

Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2021 Dec 3;8(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s40479-021-00167-5.


DOI:10.1186/s40479-021-00167-5
PMID:34857035
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8639404/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The gap between treatment need and treatment availability is particularly wide for individuals seeking Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT), and mobile apps based on DBT may be useful in increasing access to care and augmenting in-person DBT. This review examines DBT based apps, with a specific focus on content quality and usability. METHODS: All apps referring to DBT were identified in Google Play and iOS app stores and were systematically reviewed for app content and quality. The Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) was used to evaluate app usability and engagement. RESULTS: A total of 21 free to download apps were identified. The majority of apps (71%) included a component of skills training, five apps included a diary card feature. Most (76.19%) apps were designed to function without help from a therapist. The average user "star" rating was 4.39 out of 5. The mean overall MARS score was 3.41, with a range of 2.15 to 4.59, and 71.43% were considered minimally 'acceptable,' as defined by a score of 3 or higher. The average star rating was correlated with the total MARS score (r = .51, p = .02). Estimates of app usage differed substantially between popular and unpopular apps, with the three most popular apps accounting for 89.3% of monthly active users. CONCLUSIONS: While the present study identified many usable and engaging apps in app stores designed based on DBT, there are limited apps for clinicians. DBT based mobile apps should be carefully developed and clinically evaluated.

摘要

背景:对于寻求辩证行为疗法(DBT)的个体而言,治疗需求与可获得的治疗之间的差距尤为巨大,基于DBT的移动应用程序可能有助于增加获得治疗的机会并增强面对面DBT治疗的效果。本综述考察了基于DBT的应用程序,特别关注其内容质量和可用性。 方法:在谷歌应用商店和iOS应用商店中识别出所有提及DBT的应用程序,并对其应用内容和质量进行系统评价。使用移动应用程序评分量表(MARS)来评估应用程序的可用性和参与度。 结果:共识别出21款可免费下载的应用程序。大多数应用程序(71%)包含技能培训组件,5款应用程序具有日记卡功能。大多数(76.19%)应用程序设计为无需治疗师帮助即可运行。用户平均“星级”评分为4.39(满分5分)。MARS总体平均得分为3.41,范围为2.15至4.59,71.43%被认为至少达到“可接受”水平(定义为得分3分或更高)。平均星级评分与MARS总分相关(r = 0.51,p = 0.02)。受欢迎和不受欢迎的应用程序在应用程序使用估计方面存在很大差异,最受欢迎的三款应用程序占月活跃用户的89.3%。 结论:虽然本研究在基于DBT设计的应用商店中识别出许多可用且引人入胜的应用程序,但面向临床医生的应用程序有限。基于DBT的移动应用程序应谨慎开发并进行临床评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4524/8641165/ccbb2a439a84/40479_2021_167_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4524/8641165/cbdc9bfc0da8/40479_2021_167_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4524/8641165/ccbb2a439a84/40479_2021_167_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4524/8641165/cbdc9bfc0da8/40479_2021_167_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4524/8641165/ccbb2a439a84/40479_2021_167_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

[1]
A systematic review of dialectical behavior therapy mobile apps for content and usability.

Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2021-12-3

[2]
User Engagement and Usability of Suicide Prevention Apps: Systematic Search in App Stores and Content Analysis.

JMIR Form Res. 2021-7-14

[3]
Popular Evidence-Based Commercial Mental Health Apps: Analysis of Engagement, Functionality, Aesthetics, and Information Quality.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021-7-14

[4]
Mobile Phone Apps for Food Allergies or Intolerances in App Stores: Systematic Search and Quality Assessment Using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS).

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020-9-16

[5]
Mobile Apps for Drug-Drug Interaction Checks in Chinese App Stores: Systematic Review and Content Analysis.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021-6-15

[6]
Quality of Mobile Apps for Care Partners of People With Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias: Mobile App Rating Scale Evaluation.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022-3-29

[7]
Review and Analysis of German Mobile Apps for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Management Using the Mobile Application Rating Scale: Systematic Search in App Stores and Content Analysis.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022-5-3

[8]
German Mobile Apps in Rheumatology: Review and Analysis Using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS).

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019-8-5

[9]
Quality of Physical Activity Apps: Systematic Search in App Stores and Content Analysis.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021-6-9

[10]
Characterisation and assessment of the most popular mobile apps designed for neck pain self-management: A systematic search in app stores.

Musculoskeletal Care. 2022-3

引用本文的文献

[1]
Non-suicidal self-injury behaviours among adolescents in Beijing: protocol for an epidemiological and qualitative exploration.

BMJ Open. 2025-8-21

[2]
A Narrative Review to Identify Promising Approaches for Digital Health Interventions to Support Emotion Regulation for Adolescents With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

JMIR Ment Health. 2025-2-27

[3]
Enhancing Distress Tolerance Skills in Adolescents With Anorexia Nervosa Through the BALANCE Mobile App: Feasibility and Acceptability Study.

JMIR Form Res. 2025-2-28

[4]
The Goldilocks Zone: Finding the right balance of user and institutional risk for suicide-related generative AI queries.

PLOS Digit Health. 2025-1-8

[5]
Long-term effects of dialectical behaviour therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder and cognitive processing therapy 9 months after treatment termination.

Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024

[6]
AI-Led Mental Health Support (Wysa) for Health Care Workers During COVID-19: Service Evaluation.

JMIR Form Res. 2024-4-19

[7]
Features, Design, and Adherence to Evidence-Based Behavioral Parenting Principles in Commercial mHealth Parenting Apps: Systematic Review.

JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2023-6-1

本文引用的文献

[1]
College student interest in teletherapy and self-guided mental health supports during the COVID-19 pandemic.

J Am Coll Health. 2024-4

[2]
Dialectical behaviour therapy skills training groups for common mental health disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Affect Disord. 2022-3-1

[3]
Lessons Learned Conducting Dialectical Behavior Therapy via Telehealth in the Age of COVID-19.

Cogn Behav Pract. 2021-11

[4]
User Engagement and Usability of Suicide Prevention Apps: Systematic Search in App Stores and Content Analysis.

JMIR Form Res. 2021-7-14

[5]
Spanish-Speaking Therapists Increasingly Switch to Telepsychology During COVID-19: Networked Virtual Reality May Be Next.

Telemed J E Health. 2021-8

[6]
Data-Driven Implications for Translating Evidence-Based Psychotherapies into Technology-Delivered Interventions.

Int Conf Pervasive Comput Technol Healthc. 2020-5

[7]
Efficacy of dialectical behavior therapy for adolescent self-harm and suicidal ideation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Psychol Med. 2021-5

[8]
Mental Health Care Providers' Attitudes Toward Telepsychiatry: A Systemwide, Multisite Survey During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Psychiatr Serv. 2021-6

[9]
Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Suicidal Self-Harming Youth: Emotion Regulation, Mechanisms, and Mediators.

J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2021-9

[10]
Smartphone apps for eating disorders: A systematic review of evidence-based content and application of user-adjusted analyses.

Int J Eat Disord. 2021-5

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索