Suppr超能文献

胃肠道出血的血管造影治疗:血管加压素输注与栓塞的比较

Angiographic treatment of gastrointestinal hemorrhage: comparison of vasopressin infusion and embolization.

作者信息

Gomes A S, Lois J F, McCoy R D

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986 May;146(5):1031-7. doi: 10.2214/ajr.146.5.1031.

Abstract

The results of selective intraarterial vasopressin-infusion therapy and embolization therapy were compared in two groups of patients with major gastrointestinal hemorrhage. The site of bleeding, clinical course, complications, and transfusion requirements were evaluated in each group. Intraarterial vasopressin infusion therapy resulted in successful control of hemorrhage in 16 (70%) of 23 patients. Four patients, however, rebled and an operation was necessary, reducing the overall success rate to 52% (12 of 23). In the group treated with embolization therapy, primary success was achieved in 17 (71%) of 24 patients. Four patients in whom initial embolization failed to control bleeding underwent repeat embolization and in all four permanent control of hemorrhage was obtained, producing an overall success rate of 21 (88%) of 24. Analysis of our results according to site of hemorrhage suggests that at certain sites embolization is a preferred method of treatment; embolization allows earlier control of gastrointestinal hemorrhage and a reduction in transfusion requirements.

摘要

对两组严重胃肠道出血患者的选择性动脉内血管加压素输注疗法和栓塞疗法的结果进行了比较。对每组患者的出血部位、临床病程、并发症及输血需求进行了评估。动脉内血管加压素输注疗法使23例患者中的16例(70%)出血得到成功控制。然而,4例患者再次出血,需要进行手术,使总体成功率降至52%(23例中的12例)。在接受栓塞疗法的组中,24例患者中的17例(71%)取得了初步成功。4例初次栓塞未能控制出血的患者接受了重复栓塞,所有4例均实现了出血的永久性控制,使24例患者中的21例(88%)获得了总体成功。根据出血部位对我们的结果进行分析表明,在某些部位,栓塞是一种首选的治疗方法;栓塞能够更早地控制胃肠道出血并减少输血需求。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验