Suppr超能文献

经导管栓塞术与血管加压素输注用于控制胃肠道动静脉出血的比较。

Transcatheter embolization versus vasopressin infusion for the control of arteriocapillary gastrointestinal bleeding.

作者信息

Waltman A C

出版信息

Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1980;3(4):289-95. doi: 10.1007/BF02552746.

Abstract

The transcatheter method appropriate for use in the control of arteriocapillary gastrointestinal bleeding is a point of controversy. Intraarterial vasopressin infusion, which has been performed in more than 500 patients at the Massachusetts General Hospital, has achieved control in 90% of patients actively bleeding from the stomach and colon. In view of the severity of hemorrhage and associated illnesses in these patients, the complication rate associated with this method was low. Intraarterial vasopressin infusions were ineffective in pyloroduodenal and postoperative bleeding sites and hemorrhage from abscesses. While embolization can control bleeding in these areas, complications have been shown despite precise selective catheter placement. Because of catheterization difficulties and the permanency of the vascular occlusion, embolization is reserved for patients in whom surgical intervention would be associated with extreme risks.

摘要

适用于控制胃肠道动静脉出血的经导管方法存在争议。在麻省总医院,已有500多名患者接受了动脉内血管加压素输注,90% 胃和结肠活动性出血的患者出血得到了控制。鉴于这些患者出血的严重程度和相关疾病,该方法的并发症发生率较低。动脉内血管加压素输注对幽门十二指肠和术后出血部位以及脓肿出血无效。虽然栓塞可以控制这些部位的出血,但即使精确选择性置管仍有并发症发生。由于插管困难和血管闭塞的永久性,栓塞仅适用于手术干预风险极高的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验