State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & Dept. of Pediatric Dentistry, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Institute of Hospital Management, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Dec 1;39(6):703-708. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2021.06.012.
To evaluate the efficacy and health economics of the comprehensive therapy for the children with severe early child caries (S-ECC) under dental general anesthesia (DGA) and conventional outpatient treatment to provide references for dentists and parents in the choice of clinical treatment.
A retrospective cohort study was conducted on S-ECC children aged 36-71 months and who received dental treatment under general anesthesia or routine outpatient situation. The filled tooth survival rate, treatment cost, and cost-filled tooth survival time of the two groups were compared, and the curative effect and health economics was evaluated.
The filled tooth survival rate of the DGA group was higher than that of the routine outpatient group (<0.05). The average direct medical cost per filled tooth was significantly higher in the DGA group than in the routine outpatient group (<0.05). The direct medical cost-filled tooth survival time ratio in the DGA group was higher than that in the routine outpatient group (<0.05), but no significant difference was observed in the total medical cost-filled tooth survival time ratio (>0.05).
Compared with the conventional outpatient treatment group, the treatment outcomes of S-ECC under general anesthesia were better, and the costs were higher. However, no significant difference was observed in the total medical cost-filled tooth survival time between these two groups, and the conventional outpatient treatment did not have evident economic advantages.
评价儿童重度早期龋(S-ECC)在全身麻醉下(DGA)和常规门诊治疗的综合疗效和卫生经济学,为临床治疗中医生和家长的选择提供参考。
对 36-71 月龄接受全麻或常规门诊治疗的 S-ECC 儿童进行回顾性队列研究。比较两组的充填牙存活率、治疗费用和成本-充填牙生存时间,评价疗效和卫生经济学。
DGA 组的充填牙存活率高于常规门诊组(<0.05)。DGA 组每颗充填牙的平均直接医疗费用明显高于常规门诊组(<0.05)。DGA 组的直接医疗成本-充填牙生存时间比高于常规门诊组(<0.05),但总医疗成本-充填牙生存时间比两组无显著差异(>0.05)。
与常规门诊治疗组相比,全麻下治疗 S-ECC 的疗效较好,但成本较高。然而,两组的总医疗成本-充填牙生存时间无显著差异,常规门诊治疗并没有明显的经济优势。