Matsumori Yasuhiko, Ueda Kaname, Komori Mika, Zagar Anthony J, Kim Yongin, Jaffe Dena H, Takeshima Takao, Hirata Koichi
Sendai Headache and Neurology Clinic, Sendai, Japan.
Japan Drug Development and Medical Affairs, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., 5-1-28, Isogamidori, Chuo-ku, Kobe-shi, 651-0086, Japan.
Neurol Ther. 2022 Mar;11(1):205-222. doi: 10.1007/s40120-021-00305-9. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
The ObserVational survey of the Epidemiology, tReatment, and Care Of MigrainE study in Japan (OVERCOME [Japan]) assessed the impact and burden of migraine in Japan.
OVERCOME (Japan) was a cross-sectional, observational, population-based web survey of Japanese people with migraine conducted between July and September 2020. The burden and impact of migraine were assessed using the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS), Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (MSQ), Migraine Interictal Burden Scale (MIBS-4), and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment-Migraine scale. Results were stratified by average number of monthly headache days (0-3, 4-7, 8-14, ≥ 15).
In total, 17,071 Japanese people with migraine completed the survey. Of these, 14,033 (82.2%) met International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition criteria for migraine and 9667 (56.6%) reported a physician diagnosis of migraine. Overall, 20.7% of respondents experienced moderate-to-severe disability (MIDAS). Moderate-to-severe interictal burden (MIBS-4) was experienced by 41.5% of respondents. MSQ scores in all domains were lowest in respondents with the most frequent headaches (≥ 15 monthly headache days) and highest in those with the lowest frequency headaches (≤ 3 monthly headache days), indicating poorer quality of life in those with more frequent headaches. Work time missed due to migraine (absenteeism) increased with increasing headache frequency, from 3.8 to 6.2%; presenteeism affected 29.8-49.9% of work time. Although migraine burden was greatest in people with the most frequent headaches, those with the lowest headache frequency still experienced substantial disability, interictal burden, and impacts on productivity and quality of life. There was also substantial unmet need for migraine care: 36.5% of respondents had ever hesitated to seek medical care for their headaches, and 89.8% had never used preventive medication.
In Japan, the burden of migraine and barriers to migraine care are substantial. Improving patient awareness and healthcare provider vigilance may help improve patient outcomes.
日本偏头痛的流行病学、治疗及护理观察性调查(OVERCOME [日本])评估了偏头痛在日本的影响及负担。
OVERCOME(日本)是一项于2020年7月至9月间开展的基于网络的横断面、观察性、针对日本偏头痛患者的人群调查。使用偏头痛残疾评估量表(MIDAS)、偏头痛特异性生活质量问卷(MSQ)、偏头痛发作间期负担量表(MIBS - 4)以及工作效率和活动障碍 - 偏头痛量表评估偏头痛的负担及影响。结果按每月头痛天数的平均数(0 - 3天、4 - 7天、8 - 14天、≥15天)进行分层。
共有17,071名日本偏头痛患者完成了调查。其中,14,033名(82.2%)符合《国际头痛疾病分类》第三版偏头痛标准,9667名(56.6%)报告有医生诊断的偏头痛。总体而言,20.7%的受访者经历了中度至重度残疾(MIDAS)。41.5%的受访者经历了中度至重度发作间期负担(MIBS - 4)。所有领域的MSQ得分在头痛最频繁的受访者(每月头痛天数≥15天)中最低,在头痛频率最低的受访者(每月头痛天数≤3天)中最高,这表明头痛更频繁的人群生活质量较差。因偏头痛而错过的工作时间(旷工)随头痛频率增加而上升,从3.8%升至6.2%;出勤但工作效率低下影响了29.8% - 49.9%的工作时间。尽管偏头痛负担在头痛最频繁的人群中最大,但头痛频率最低的人群仍经历了严重的残疾、发作间期负担以及对工作效率和生活质量的影响。偏头痛护理方面也存在大量未满足的需求:36.5%的受访者曾因头痛而犹豫是否寻求医疗护理,89.8%的人从未使用过预防性药物。
在日本,偏头痛负担及偏头痛护理障碍相当大。提高患者意识和医疗服务提供者的警惕性可能有助于改善患者结局。